

Nigel Scott
5.9K posts

@LibSubversive
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.




Cannot recommend this enough. This is an absolutely brilliant podcast series and will tell you what the main stream media didn't



This Panorama clip, of Professor Gregory’s interview with Ms Moritz, is artfully done. It implies a lot more than it says. bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod… (from 41:23) Firstly, it shows Professor Gregory studying something carefully—we presume, evidence from the case—but a screenshot reveals it is, in fact, a medical journal. (After a bit of Poundshop Poiroting I found it: “Autoimmune Forms of Hypoglycemia” by Lupsa, Chong et al from vol 88, issue 3 of the journal Medicine in May 2009: journals.lww.com/md-journal/ful…) Professor Gregory’s first statement to camera is generalised, abstract and non-definitive, and not really in dispute. “When you measure insulin, if you don’t find any C-peptide, that implies that the insulin has come from outside the body, perhaps in the form of an injection, for example.” Ms. Moritz’ follow-up question presents him not with any specifics about Ms. Letby’s case, but a vague hypothetical which invites him to corroborate what he has just said: “What would you conclude where a baby has low blood sugar, where the baby’s insulin level is in the thousands, and where the baby’s C-peptide is low or unmeasurable?” Professor Gregory: “I would conclude that the baby has had insulin administered somehow or other.” Ms. Moritz then, off camera — notably, she does not put it to Professor Gregory— draws an inference to the Ms. Letby’s case: “That’s what was found in two of the babies Letby was convicted of harming.” This is not an endocrinologist specifically validating the evidence presented at trial: it is, rather, an expert expressing an uncontested generality. This doesn’t really tell us anything. Interestingly, there is no other record of Professor Gregory offering any view on the case.

Lucy Letby has been in prison for 2000 days without any direct evidence against her and with the circumstantial case in shreds. Here's my tuppence. open.substack.com/pub/kateclanch…

From accused to advocate for scrutiny, Amanda Knox is revisiting the Lucy Letby case in her new podcast, “Doubt: The Case of Lucy Letby.”

Now on Liberal Voices. Craven politicians. liberalvoices.org/the-silence-th…

I didn’t know this! Revelatory! The actual word derives from the (French) sound of the block of print clicking into place…

Very wise words indeed

Every country or jurisdiction that has actually examined the evidence for paediatric gender medicine, seriously and rigorously, has changed course. Different healthcare systems. Different political landscapes. All reaching the same conclusion: this experiment cannot be allowed to continue. 17 systematic reviews have all concluded that the evidence for this treatment protocol is low to very low quality. And yet Canada’s federal and provincial governments — with the exception of Alberta — still fail to act. The time for looking the other way is over. Indeed, the very fact that Canada has looked away for so long is a national disgrace. My statement at the @May_Day_Canada press conference on Parliament Hill this morning








