Project Guiding Light

❗️NEW VIDEO❗️ #NEW | THE MADKHALIS IV | The Betrayers of The Believers & Allies of the Disbelievers 📺YouTube Link: youtu.be/DN5w_IlUVys I ask Allah to accept this minuscule effort, and make it a means of Sadaqa Jāriyah for every Muwahhid, as well as a means of guidance for any sincere Madkhali. Please share in the Ajr (Insha’Allah), by sharing with your friends and family, even with your neighborhood Madkhali too! If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out. If you'd like to translate into your own language, SRT file is found on our Telegram channel: t.me/project_guidin… If you haven’t watched the previous parts of the series: PART 01: THE MADKHALIS | Fawzān, Ibn Bāz, Sālih Āl Ash-Shaykh, Ghunaymān vs Faris al-Hammadi & co.:    youtube.com/watch?v=-djCcM… PART 02: THE MADKHALIS II | THE DECEIVERS OF THE UMMAH:    youtube.com/watch?v=oHMM8H… PART 03: #NEW | THE MADKHALIS III | The Zandaqa of Shamsi and co. & The Kufr of Saudi Arabia: youtube.com/watch?v=v19AJr… Original (Shadow Banned) YouTube account, that contains all of our past videos, minus the ones above: @ProjectGuidingLight" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">youtube.com/@ProjectGuidin… والحمدلله رب العالمين

Saudi Government entity calling Judaism and Christianity “monotheistic” is Kufr and Shirk by consensus of everyone who’s smelt the scent of Islam. Of course Madkhalis will burry their head in the sand, and ignore it. What a pitiful state of a people, where their deen is “guided” by the foreign policy of a Taghut government. For those who claim this is not a government entity, see below. Anyone who is honest will not hesitate to see the Kufr and Zandaqa of such an evil government. Let alone ascribe it to Salafiyyah.

@jijgtf Madkhalis:

Was waiting for a Zindīq Madkhali to try and deflect. It’s a non-profit, because it has other Kuffār from outside countries, on its board of directors. It’s still government funded, government founded cesspool of Kufr and Shirk. (See below from various government-linked Saudi outlets, the entity itself, and the UN counter terrorism center). Now the question remains, what’s the Hukm on a government who founds such an entity, funds it, is clearly okay with its mission, and actively promotes it? Don’t be shy.

@OmarJa465199 x.com/projectguiding…

@ProjectGuiding Literally says non governmental org

@cxliphate No problem akhi, wa Iyyakum.

@ProjectGuiding جزاك الله خيرا Thank you for sharing this, I genuinely didn’t know

@cxliphate x.com/projectguiding…

@ProjectGuiding Brother you’re right, but the account explicitly states it’s a non-governmental organization. This doesn’t change anything concerning the Saudi government but in this particular case, this is not something the government said

Fyi.

1) Your reading comprehension is non existent. 2) The Hadith, if Sahih, isn’t shirk to begin with — so your npc conclusion you slandered I made, is entirely made up on your end with no basis in what I said. 3) The only point of dispute is if it’s Sahih, not whether it’s Shirk. 4) The education system in America clearly failed you.

@ProjectGuiding @HarounKanj So Imam Ahmad committed shirk not knowing the hadith promoted quburism? Gotca. Now that we have a Wahhabis who can authenticate the hadith, it becomes shirk. You have no honor for your principles. The khawarij who faught Ali(r.a) were better than you.

The only way to deal with such Zanadiqah, at least online. In person, their prescribed punishment would probably be a bit more colorful.

According to the Hadith — which is weak — Allah created Angels who were tasked with guiding others who are lost along their travels — and you call them “magic specially gps knowing angels?” The action, if truly attributed to Imam Ahmad, is not correct because the Hadith is weak, not because the necessitation of his action is Shirk — you dimwit. So on that basis, no you shouldn’t. Hard to believe you Zanadiqa are aql over naql when you have zero aql yourselves.

The authenticity of the Hadith is not the premise of the response you dimwit. The premise is that it’s not shirk, since these angels are locally present, alive, and able — since they were tasked with this purpose by Allah, as the narration states. You Mushrikeen will try and fit a square into a circle, if it “justifies” making Duā to other than Allah. Truly a cursed people.

@ProjectGuiding @HarounKanj Ok cool, can I act like Imam Ahmad and call upon those magic specially gps knowing angels and ask for the way if I'm lost?

@ProjectGuiding @HarounKanj The authenticity of the hadith makes 0 difference for the fact that Imam Ahmad acted upon it. Takfir him if you have any principles.

@HarounKanj @ProjectGuiding How is your Istigatha to Trump coming along?

Dear Brother, For those who are harsh/slander the Muslims (dead/alive), Mujahideen or otherwise the lay amongst us, or the Scholars, I’m justifiably harsh with them. As for the Laymen, or anyone who is respectful in their disagreement, I have always been gentle in my discussions with them. When you slander the Muslims, I treat it like you’re slandering my own blood brother and will approach you harshly. That’s always been my approach akhi.

@ProjectGuiding @haqqelberry For example your videos may Allah give barakah in them. I feel like when they are directed towards muslims like the murjiah they are too harsh. If you were to switch and have a dawah mentality then potentially they will have more effect.

The filthy Kafir wanna-be cowboy strikes again, not sufficing himself with calling The Prophet a “non-Muslim prior to the Risālah,” والعياذ بالله. He has doubled down by adding “belying The Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم” to his list of heresies, and likewise belying the applied understanding of the Scholars from the Sahabah رضي الله عنهم. The Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم Said in a clear Hadith: “Whoever changes his religion [from Islam], then unalive him.” [Bukhari 6922] The very next Hadith entry by Imām Al-Bukhari رحمه الله تعالى رحمة واسعة, is an incident where the Noble Sahabi Mu’adh Ibn Jabal applies this Hadith, during The Life of The Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم: “…Then Mu’adh ibn Jabal followed him. When he arrived, Abu Musa laid out a cushion for him and said: ‘Dismount.’ And behold — there was a man beside him, bound in fetters. Mu’adh said: ‘What is this?’ He said: ‘He was a Jew, then he embraced Islam, then he returned to Judaism.’ Abu Musa said: ‘Sit down.’ Mu’adh said: ‘I will not sit down until he is unalived. It is the judgment of Allah and His Messenger’ — three times. So he gave the order, and the man was unalived…” [Bukhari 6923] Again, this Zindiq’s logic is so stupid, it’s not even worth directly responding to. Suffice for the Muslim, is the Hadith of The Messenger, and likewise the applied understanding of The Sahabah, in order to understand it.

@ZakHu18111965 @abolore12345 @AhmedSheriffdin The fact they think this is a “gotcha” is so pathetic.

@abolore12345 @AhmedSheriffdin @ProjectGuiding Non-Salafis: "Imam Ahmad was a mushrik (according to your beliefs) because he called upon angels." This question was answered a hundred times. Imam Ahmad was acting upon a hadith which said to call upon angels of the road to guide him to his destination.

@HarounKanj You brain dead Mushrik, how is acting on a weak Hadith, which states that Allah created specific angles that are not All-Hearing, solely for the purpose of guiding travelers, the same as making Duā to dead people? Being a Mushrik is undoubtably tied to being stupid.

@ProjectGuiding Why are you defending Shirk, you Shirk loving Jahmi?

These are the people that @Haqiqatjou is taking guidance from, and recycling centuries old emotional arguements from. May Allah continue to expose this Zindīq. Answer the question, and don’t be a coward: If someone goes to a Buddha statue, and sits next to it and says, “O Buddha, grant me Rizq, or grant me a child (etc),” whilst believing that Allah is The One who facilitates this by giving this Buddha statue the ability to fulfill his request. Is this person labeled a Mushrik, yes or no? If someone were to say yes, is Shaykh Al-Islam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhāb رحمه الله تعالى رحمة واسعة the one who “innovated” this position? Yes or no. Again, don’t be a coward, and try to name drop @FarisHammadi, who if anything, rivals you in Zandaqa and deviance.

🚨ATTENTION MUSHRIKEEN: Where do you stand from the Ayāt of Allah🚨 🧵The Mushrikeen of Quraysh vs The Mushrikeen of Nowadays: What’s the Difference? [if any] 1) The Mushrikeen of Quraysh believed that Allah was the Creator of all things: And if you were to ask them: "Who has created the heavens and the earth and subjected the sun and the moon?" they will surely reply: "Allâh." How then are they deviating (as polytheists and disbelievers)? [29:61]

This Kafir Mushrik said verbatim: “However, Wahhabis act as if Islam exclusively centers on tawhid.” You can’t make this up. Even the Mushrikeen of Quraysh understood Tawheed better than this deluded Mushrik, Allah Says, about the Mushrikeen of Quraysh, of their response, after the Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم told them to say — and by necessity live by — لا إله إلا الله: أَجَعَلَ ٱلۡأٓلِهَةَ إِلَٰهًا وَٰحِدًاۖ إِنَّ هَٰذَا لَشَىۡءٌ عُجَابٌ "Has he made the âlihah (gods) (all) into One Ilâh (God - Allâh). Verily, this is a curious thing!" Yes you feminine Mushrik @Haqiqatjou, Islam exclusively centers around Tawheed.