South Carolina Red Line

1.3K posts

South Carolina Red Line banner
South Carolina Red Line

South Carolina Red Line

@SC_RedLine

Tracking South Carolina’s radical leftist and globalist infiltration; putting the pieces together.

South Carolina, U.S.A. Joined Ekim 2024
326 Following200 Followers
Pinned Tweet
South Carolina Red Line
South Carolina Red Line@SC_RedLine·
Great news and you will have my vote! But the “climate change” problem in South Carolina goes deeper than climate research. Here’s what I learned. In SC, climate change policies —aka UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) — are being normalized and incorporated directly into state operations via Sustain SC, an organization jump-started by Google (a major UN SDG cheerleader), and dedicated to “improve South Carolina’s SDG ranking and providing opportunities for businesses in our state to actively commit to these sustainability goals at the local level.” Oh, and spread the ESG system which captures the supply chain, forcing businesses up and down the chain to submit to global UN policies. Sustain SC cooperates with the SC Dept of Commerce; is populated by UN SDG-supporting businesses and progressive conservation groups (local and national); and works in close partnership with Gov. McMaster, the man pledging to put 50% of undeveloped state land out of the grasp of biz & property owners (and into eventual state control?). All those parcels of land being purchased across SC and put into conservation land trusts? Yep, that’s part of it. How much state taxpayer money is involved? I’ll leave that to the follow-the-money detectives. SC Office of Resilience (SCOR)’s Resilience and Risk Reduction plan for the state is a important source of embedding climate change policy at the state organization level. Be sure to dig into the footnote references. Sustain SC, in partnership with The Shi Institute for Sustainable Communities at Furman University (furman.edu/shi-institute/), runs the Sustainability Leadership Initiative (sustainsouthcarolina.org/sli) (SLI), bringing business executives, conservation orgs, and state officials into the climate change/UN SDG belief system and social/biz circle. Money, opportunity, and access are their diplomas. These people shape our policies, aligning them with global plans. And there is RISE (Resilience, Innovation, and Sustainability through Education) a United Nations Regional Centre of Expertise (RCE) on Education for Sustainable Development operating in Georgetown County, SC. They “educate communities” in the SDGs. (coastal.edu/rise/about/) These are among the key beneficiaries from climate change policies in our state. This state activity is aided by environmental justice activism grassroots-community building that took place via SC DES & DPH & Energy Office’s EJ trainings before Trump cut the funding. It is spread to many churches as Biblically sound. The losers here are small businesses, taxpayers, and citizens who understand that the UN SDGs represent an agenda to transform South Carolina’s (and the US) economic and political systems to align with European systems for the new era of global governance. The method is through incremental policy change. All of our traditional political systems are targeted for replacement. Our economy will be moved from capitalism based on GDP to a “wellbeing economy” where *everything* is recycled (circular economy) and citizen satisfaction and social relationships are the measure of a nation’s prosperity. 🤪 American liberties, norms, and values will be forced to conform to EU standards, i.e, collectivism over individualism, state secular spirituality instead of religion, government ruling over subjects instead of the one designed by our Founding Fathers, LGBTQ+, “gender identity,” hate speech laws (censorship) open borders, DEI, socialized health care, “tiny homes,” less red meat consumption, ESG, 15-minute cities with “shared vehicles,” etc. Proponents of the SDGs never go into the hardship their drastic energy policies will cause as they tell us that we need to change our consumption and production practices (except for the ruling class). They assure us “you’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy.” If you can put a stop to it, you have my vote and that of every patriotic conservative.
English
1
5
15
1K
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Nick Reynolds
Nick Reynolds@IAmNickReynolds·
Folks are being told there is an agreement in principle but that an issue with the computer system is delaying a printing of the amendment. There should be a vote at some point, we just don't know when right now.
English
1
1
3
1.8K
South Carolina Red Line
South Carolina Red Line@SC_RedLine·
South Carolina, I’ve encountered all these topics on SC ed websites 2-3 clicks from the home pages, plus all the authors that he listed pepper articles by ed faculty and grad students! Our Colleges of Ed are factories for “woke,” injected directly into K-12 and then serving as a finishing school for those “college-ready” students when they come for degrees. Honestly, our medical colleges do even greater damage. Much worse.
NAVI@NAVIvalues

“It [was] easier for me, as an administrator, to teach somebody in the nuts and bolts of teaching than to try and deprogram a graduate from a school of education.” @MrDanielBuck of @AEI talks realities of how far gone from the science of teaching colleges of education are. See our entire webinar on the topic here - youtube.com/watch?v=7H2yxo…

English
1
6
10
1.4K
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Michael Shellenberger
Michael Shellenberger@shellenberger·
Energy prices are spiking and stocks are crashing because Iran bombed a massive liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar. But the underlying problem has been decades of opposition from Democrats to natural gas, which led Biden to ban the construction of new LNG plants.
Michael Shellenberger tweet media
English
63
183
869
100.7K
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Palmetto State Watch
Palmetto State Watch@WatchPalmetto·
From a long term contract with the AG’s office to sitting on a multimillion dollar state settlement, one person has been among the biggest beneficiaries of the South Carolina Attorney General’s office. It appears he’s now spreading his government-derived wealth among the good ole’ boys that hold office in South Carolina.   Since receiving a cut of the $75 million Plutonium Settlement in 2020, his donations total over $388k to Republicans and nearly $65k to Democrats.   That’s over $452,000 dollars in just five years.   Find out about how Randy Lowell (of Burr & Forman, formerly Willoughby & Hoefer), along with his businesses and law firm has been fueling the Uniparty in South Carolina: palmettostatewatchfoundation.com/2026/03/13/ele…
Palmetto State Watch tweet media
English
3
31
38
3.6K
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
America First
America First@KihneSheila·
This happened in SOUTH CAROLINA!👇 Parents reported to the state government by school staff-- for NOT allowing their son to pretend to be a girl at school. But it shouldn't be a surprise In South Carolina, the State Library promotes the radical American Library Association's agenda which advocates "affirming gender" of kids in the library -- even telling them how to hide their "identity" from their parents! The SC State Library TODAY-- links the ALA's "Supporting Trans* teens in the Public Library" presentation (see pictures) This instructs library staff to ask questions like: "If your parent/guardian calls, what name & pronoun should I use?" "Is it still okay to use your old pronoun when I'm talking to your mom?" The ALA also "encourages library workers to serve as allies and advocates for gender and sexual orientation diverse children and adolescents in schools" Why is this left-wing institution still so present in our government? Why are libraries forced to ONLY HIRE FT librarians who hold a master's degree from an ALA accredited program? @SCHouseGOP @scsenategop @henrymcmaster @AGAlanWilson @RalphNorman @NancyMace @PamelaEvette
America First tweet mediaAmerica First tweet mediaAmerica First tweet media
Matt Van Swol@mattvanswol

🚨#BREAKING: A South Carolina mother just shared one of the most disturbing school gender transition stories I've read in a long time. Her 14-year-old son attended Beech Springs Middle School in Spartanburg SC. For OVER A YEAR, he was changing into girls' clothing at school, and changing back before his mom picked him up. It was apparently a daily operation, coordinating with another student to bring the clothes, multiple bathroom trips, and deliberate concealment from his parents every single day. Multiple staff members at school had to have seen this. You don't pull off daily clothing changes in a middle school without teachers noticing. But NOBODY called home to tell his parents. Nobody except one teacher. One teacher the previous year did her job, she noticed, she called the mom, and she followed South Carolina law H.4624, which explicitly requires school staff to notify parents when a student expresses gender identity confusion. That call is the only reason the family found out at all. They got their son into gender-related counseling over the summer of 2025. They were engaged, they were involved, they were actively trying to help their kid navigate something difficult. Then the school went silent again. The pattern continued into the next school year and nobody said a word. Fast forward to February 2026. The mom gets her son's hair cut. He cries in class. His teacher sits with him for 10 minutes while he tells her everything, that he wants long hair like a girl, that his parents won't affirm his gender identity, all of it. Again, South Carolina law H.4624 exists for exactly this moment. When a student expresses gender identity distress to a school employee, the law says the school SHALL notify the parents. But the teacher didn't call the mom. She called DSS. That same day, February 13, 2026, she filed a child protective services report against this family for "medical neglect..." Medical neglect because A) the boy allegedly coughed up blood and wasn't receiving care. B) Mental injury because the parents won't affirm a gender transition. And... I'm not even kidding C) making him do "manly chores." The mom asked her son what that meant. He said "cutting the grass." DSS showed up at their home on Valentine's Day weekend. Two days later, the family took their son and got a chest x-ray. His lungs were completely clear. He never coughed up blood. The allegation was fabricated. On February 19th, five days after the report was filed, DSS closed the case. Unfounded. No evidence of medical neglect. No evidence of mental injury. Nothing. So just to recap... A teacher had a 10-minute conversation with a 14-year-old, decided his parents' refusal to affirm a gender transition constituted child abuse, invented or wildly exaggerated a medical claim to make the report actionable, violated state law by never calling the parents, and weaponized DSS on a family over Valentine's Day weekend. And the school's response? The principal wrote back defending the teacher. Called the DSS report "appropriate based on medical neglect suspicion." The report that was closed completely unfounded in five days. The report based on a medical claim that was disproven with a chest x-ray. That report. Appropriate The principal also mentioned that staff had received "gender identity training" and that the school followed "applicable South Carolina statutes." But the H.4624 violation, the actual law that was actually broken, was never addressed. Not once. The superintendent promised a full investigation by a Chief Administrative Officer. Instead, the principal, the direct supervisor of the teacher in question, provided the only written response, and used it to defend her own employee. This school watched a student secretly change genders during the school day for over a year and chose not to tell his mother. That's not an accident. You don't miss daily clothing changes in a middle school. They saw it. They allowed it. They made a decision, collectively and repeatedly, that the parents didn't need to know. Then when that same family's values came up in a conversation, the response wasn't to pick up the phone and call mom like the law requires. The response was to report them for child abuse. The silence for a year and the DSS report aren't two separate events. They're the same event. They both reflect the same institutional decision: we know better than these parents, and we will act accordingly, whether that means hiding things from them or weaponizing the state against them. This family did everything right. They got their son counseling. They stayed engaged. They were present. They got a chest x-ray to disprove a fabricated allegation. DSS came into their home, looked at how they parent, and walked out five days later with literally nothing. But the school is STILL calling it appropriate. The mom has filed complaints with both the school and the South Carolina Department of Education. The school defended the teacher. The state has been silent for over a month. Her son is now homeschooled, by the way and she says he's thriving. The school literally weaponized the state against a family for cutting their son's hair. Let that sink in.

English
0
3
10
387
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Rep. Thomas Beach
Rep. Thomas Beach@ThomasBeach·
Here’s my amendment. You can see who spoke against it and how they voted.
Rep. Thomas Beach tweet media
English
2
3
16
290
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
The Post and Courier
The Post and Courier@postandcourier·
South Carolina’s electric cooperatives have unanimously approved a deal that would make mandatory five distinct consumer protections for data center development. postandcourier.com/politics/sc-el…
English
0
2
2
776
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Rep. Thomas Beach
Rep. Thomas Beach@ThomasBeach·
Scary stuff from a middle school in SPARTANBURG. I pushed an amendment to require teachers to notify parents about gender transitioning at school, but Davey Hiott and the rest of the GOP caucus said no.
Matt Van Swol@mattvanswol

🚨#BREAKING: A South Carolina mother just shared one of the most disturbing school gender transition stories I've read in a long time. Her 14-year-old son attended Beech Springs Middle School in Spartanburg SC. For OVER A YEAR, he was changing into girls' clothing at school, and changing back before his mom picked him up. It was apparently a daily operation, coordinating with another student to bring the clothes, multiple bathroom trips, and deliberate concealment from his parents every single day. Multiple staff members at school had to have seen this. You don't pull off daily clothing changes in a middle school without teachers noticing. But NOBODY called home to tell his parents. Nobody except one teacher. One teacher the previous year did her job, she noticed, she called the mom, and she followed South Carolina law H.4624, which explicitly requires school staff to notify parents when a student expresses gender identity confusion. That call is the only reason the family found out at all. They got their son into gender-related counseling over the summer of 2025. They were engaged, they were involved, they were actively trying to help their kid navigate something difficult. Then the school went silent again. The pattern continued into the next school year and nobody said a word. Fast forward to February 2026. The mom gets her son's hair cut. He cries in class. His teacher sits with him for 10 minutes while he tells her everything, that he wants long hair like a girl, that his parents won't affirm his gender identity, all of it. Again, South Carolina law H.4624 exists for exactly this moment. When a student expresses gender identity distress to a school employee, the law says the school SHALL notify the parents. But the teacher didn't call the mom. She called DSS. That same day, February 13, 2026, she filed a child protective services report against this family for "medical neglect..." Medical neglect because A) the boy allegedly coughed up blood and wasn't receiving care. B) Mental injury because the parents won't affirm a gender transition. And... I'm not even kidding C) making him do "manly chores." The mom asked her son what that meant. He said "cutting the grass." DSS showed up at their home on Valentine's Day weekend. Two days later, the family took their son and got a chest x-ray. His lungs were completely clear. He never coughed up blood. The allegation was fabricated. On February 19th, five days after the report was filed, DSS closed the case. Unfounded. No evidence of medical neglect. No evidence of mental injury. Nothing. So just to recap... A teacher had a 10-minute conversation with a 14-year-old, decided his parents' refusal to affirm a gender transition constituted child abuse, invented or wildly exaggerated a medical claim to make the report actionable, violated state law by never calling the parents, and weaponized DSS on a family over Valentine's Day weekend. And the school's response? The principal wrote back defending the teacher. Called the DSS report "appropriate based on medical neglect suspicion." The report that was closed completely unfounded in five days. The report based on a medical claim that was disproven with a chest x-ray. That report. Appropriate The principal also mentioned that staff had received "gender identity training" and that the school followed "applicable South Carolina statutes." But the H.4624 violation, the actual law that was actually broken, was never addressed. Not once. The superintendent promised a full investigation by a Chief Administrative Officer. Instead, the principal, the direct supervisor of the teacher in question, provided the only written response, and used it to defend her own employee. This school watched a student secretly change genders during the school day for over a year and chose not to tell his mother. That's not an accident. You don't miss daily clothing changes in a middle school. They saw it. They allowed it. They made a decision, collectively and repeatedly, that the parents didn't need to know. Then when that same family's values came up in a conversation, the response wasn't to pick up the phone and call mom like the law requires. The response was to report them for child abuse. The silence for a year and the DSS report aren't two separate events. They're the same event. They both reflect the same institutional decision: we know better than these parents, and we will act accordingly, whether that means hiding things from them or weaponizing the state against them. This family did everything right. They got their son counseling. They stayed engaged. They were present. They got a chest x-ray to disprove a fabricated allegation. DSS came into their home, looked at how they parent, and walked out five days later with literally nothing. But the school is STILL calling it appropriate. The mom has filed complaints with both the school and the South Carolina Department of Education. The school defended the teacher. The state has been silent for over a month. Her son is now homeschooled, by the way and she says he's thriving. The school literally weaponized the state against a family for cutting their son's hair. Let that sink in.

English
9
45
117
13.4K
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Tuki
Tuki@TukiFromKL·
🚨 Let me tell you why this Goldman Sachs headline is the most dangerous one you'll read today.. Companies spent $450 billion on AI last year.. fired tens of thousands of people to "restructure around AI".. replaced entire departments with chatbots.. And Goldman Sachs just said it contributed basically zero to economic growth.. so where did the money go? > It went to Nvidia.. $130 billion in GPU sales.. Jensen is the only man on earth who got rich from AI that hasn't produced anything yet.. > It went to stock buybacks.. companies fired people, cut costs, reported "record profits" and bought back their own shares.. the money went UP not OUT.. Jesus! > It went to a bubble.. the same way crypto money went to Lamborghinis and not infrastructure.. AI money is going to valuations and not productivity.. here's the part that should terrify you.. They already fired the people.. Atlassian 1,600.. Meta 21,000.. Block 40%.. Amazon warehouses.. the jobs are already gone.. But the growth didn't come.. the productivity didn't come.. the revenue didn't come.. they burned the village to build a city that doesn't exist yet.. and Goldman Sachs just looked at the empty lot and said "there's nothing here"
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

"Massive investment in AI contributed basically zero to US economic growth last year," per Goldman Sachs

English
446
7.5K
30.1K
2.1M
South Carolina Red Line
South Carolina Red Line@SC_RedLine·
4/ Case in point from February 2026 is the River Bluff high school student who was quoted at an anti-ICE protest as having been so inspired by messaging that he formed Midlands Youth for Liberation. The SC Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL SC) now shares social media posts with that group and with College Students for Collective Liberation. The numbers are growing. postandcourier.com/columbia/news/…
English
0
0
0
32
South Carolina Red Line
South Carolina Red Line@SC_RedLine·
3/Having conservatives show up to support a progressive-organized rally helps to spread the communist-infested operation well beyond Charleston and Columbia. Even bucolic gem Edgefield, SC is now targeted, likely not by communists (yet), but probably by the stereotypical well-meaning but misguided leftists so often at the root of our woes. It ends up being a seed that sprouts more of the same.
South Carolina Red Line tweet media
English
1
0
0
19
South Carolina Red Line
Community Schools: Researchers interested in South Carolina's WSCC plan to bring schools/families under gov control via health & the SC groups involved in its development, DM me. Can point you to docs & I understand the fit with SEL, personalized learning, Profile of the South Carolina Graduate. Also, follow @kellyske on this topic. She's the best. I learned from her.
Steve Hilton@SteveHiltonx

You need to know about the Democrats' "Community Schools." They are "an erosion of parental rights and an insertion of the government into the family." Shocking insight from @kellyske into Gavin Newsom’s preferred public school model and its ties to communism. A MUST LISTEN for every California parent👇

English
0
2
6
153
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Courage Is A Habit
Courage Is A Habit@CourageHabit·
Thank you to @Tyler2ONeil and @DailySignal for the exclusive in highlighting our report. Government K-12, under the guise of “mental health” for girls, are pushing radical feminism and all radical ideologies through the Lean In Girls Report program. This is headed by Sheryl Sandberg who was directly responsible for silencing millions of conservative voices between 2019-2022 when she was at Facebook. She was at the helm of all that “fact checking”. That is who is driving mental health for your daughter through this program. Report on our site: courageisahabit.org/tools/lean-in-…
English
0
7
10
161
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Margot Cleveland
Margot Cleveland@ProfMJCleveland·
When I was in law school, we learned about something called “the one-way ratchet theory of rights.”  This legalistic abomination, pushed by Thurgood Marshall among others, contended that once a governmental entity created a new “right,” it could not later decide to take that “right” away.  It now appears federal district courts are putting the one-way ratchet theory to a new use: if a Democrat administration expands the government, a Republican administration cannot later undo the expansion, even if it uses the same procedural mechanisms.  Government can never shrink; it can only grow.  As with all of The Left’s “legal” theories, The Left always wins.
English
203
1.3K
6.1K
190.7K
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Nicole Solas, Sued by the Teachers Union
The Department of Labor has a new tool to see how unions spend dues on political donations. Go see how the teachers unions use teachers' hard earned salaries for radical politics. Link next post.👇🏻
Nicole Solas, Sued by the Teachers Union tweet media
English
4
76
150
4.9K