creativcoder

1.2K posts

creativcoder banner
creativcoder

creativcoder

@creativcoder

Rust / compilers / databases / calisthenics / art / metacognition

DM for collaborations/help Joined Mayıs 2012
2.1K Following392 Followers
creativcoder
creativcoder@creativcoder·
@gvanrossum @kushaldas @simonw @rahulj51 Just like how software has become on demand and generated and disposable, on demand course curriculum can be generated so beginner students can learn them on use case basis / on demand.
English
0
0
0
17
Rahul Jain
Rahul Jain@rahulj51·
The thing about this is that no one has a clue what human SWEs would be doing instead. The idea that we would all be reviewing code is flawed. Because agents can review code much better. I think our only advantage right now as human SWEs is that we have an almost infinite context window over very long horizons.
Ryan Dahl@rough__sea

This has been said a thousand times before, but allow me to add my own voice: the era of humans writing code is over. Disturbing for those of us who identify as SWEs, but no less true. That's not to say SWEs don't have work to do, but writing syntax directly is not it.

English
83
25
572
102.4K
creativcoder
creativcoder@creativcoder·
@stevekrouse @rough__sea But with punch cards to assembly/ programming language abstraction, we still had deterministic guarantees (sans compiler instruction reordering), but with llms as an abstraction it has become probabilistic.
English
0
0
1
158
Steve Krouse
Steve Krouse@stevekrouse·
@rough__sea This is true in the same way that the era of punchcards came to an end. The way we write code is definitely changing! The real question is what will be the role of the human brain in programming? I gave a talk about it 6 months ago that I think holds up: youtube.com/watch?v=1WC8dx…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
18
39
465
321.1K
Ryan Dahl
Ryan Dahl@rough__sea·
This has been said a thousand times before, but allow me to add my own voice: the era of humans writing code is over. Disturbing for those of us who identify as SWEs, but no less true. That's not to say SWEs don't have work to do, but writing syntax directly is not it.
English
969
2.7K
20K
7.3M
Shobhit Bakliwal
Shobhit Bakliwal@shobhitic·
Flags everywhere on 100ft road, indiranagar
Shobhit Bakliwal tweet mediaShobhit Bakliwal tweet media
English
82
27
1.1K
171.2K
creativcoder
creativcoder@creativcoder·
I've been trying to get into digital music making lately, and this video is really a rare piece on understanding music primitives wrt auditory perception. youtu.be/mTGI15msfrE?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
2
116
creativcoder
creativcoder@creativcoder·
@waitin4agi_ The glowing tattoos reminds me of prince of persia two thrones
English
0
0
1
402
Varun Mayya
Varun Mayya@waitin4agi_·
Some stills from the early alpha
Varun Mayya tweet mediaVarun Mayya tweet mediaVarun Mayya tweet mediaVarun Mayya tweet media
English
151
135
3.2K
223.9K
creativcoder
creativcoder@creativcoder·
@ryolu_ I'm building something that embeds the terminal inside of a functional gui. You start with the terminal interface but when you need more; with a key combination it can shape shift into much more. Soon.
English
0
0
0
27
Ryo Lu
Ryo Lu@ryolu_·
the shell: mac os is just a unix shell. windows was just an msdos shell. they're alternate interfaces wrapping the same concepts underneath. terminal romantics miss this. CLIs are powerful and direct, sure, but they're not the destination – they're the starting point. they existed because computers were timeshared and we couldn't afford more pixels. the 2025 terminal UI fad is going backwards. people building TUIs think they're more pure, but they're naturally limiting. they're cargo culting the aesthetics of constraint without understanding why those constraints existed. CLIs are transitory and serve fewer people well. they were the bridge from punch cards to something better. mac os x proved this in 2001 – you could drop into terminal when needed, but aqua brought way more people to the mac and internet for the first time. the natural progression is toward interfaces that are accessible and customized for everyone. not just people who memorize flags and pipe commands. with AI, the next shell is intent – you use the best interface that fits you to iterate on what to make, what is good, with all context, and the agent handles the rest. Notion and Cursor are hinting at this. the best interface is the one you don't notice. the shell should feel invisible.
English
124
43
748
169.9K
creativcoder
creativcoder@creativcoder·
@redixhumayun I assumed there were some special optimizations being run for primitive types in nodrop case, but tried with any type T and it emits the same error. The language gives surprises every now and then 😅
English
0
0
0
21
Zaid Humayun
Zaid Humayun@redixhumayun·
@creativcoder I'm confused. What's special about non-primitive types that this wouldn't be true for them?
English
1
0
1
39
Zaid Humayun
Zaid Humayun@redixhumayun·
Reading about drop check behaviour in Rust has broken my mind a little bit.
Zaid Humayun tweet mediaZaid Humayun tweet media
English
2
0
1
471
creativcoder
creativcoder@creativcoder·
Prompt: Home made rawa fish steak, dressed with roasted tomatoes, arugula, onions, walnuts and orange. ps: this is hand generated 😅
creativcoder tweet media
English
0
0
6
346
creativcoder
creativcoder@creativcoder·
@theproductwoman that feeling of coming home early morning, when you are half way to school and you come to know that it's a holiday was so >>>>>>
English
1
0
3
477
Radhika Dani
Radhika Dani@theproductwoman·
I used to love waking up early on the days I had no school. Or if given the option, wake up early but no school. I used to cycle around the streets observing the morning shopkeepers, chai-walas, phool walas, and the empty streets. used to the be the best start to mornings. No churning out kms / avg speed / time. A bottle of water, Walkman, and out the door. Coming back home drenched in sweat. Bath, breakfast and chill. Maybe read a book or learn something on the chunky computer. simpler times and joys. ❤️✨
English
10
5
199
14.1K
Gurpriya
Gurpriya@GurpriyaSidhu·
When we are in school or college, we are a "nobody" to the world. We don't have a social status of our own and an identity beyond our grades. When we move into cities, take up jobs, and grow into our careers, we become a "somebody". We are "somebody" with a job, a CTC, a vehicle, a postal address. When a "nobody" meets a "nobody", there is a lot of room for friendship. We are collectively vulnerable in our "nobody-ness". As a result, schools and colleges become fertile grounds for friendship. This is even more heightened in boarding schools and army camps. Collective vulnerability paired with strong formative experiences leads to deep connection. In contrast, when a "somebody" meets a "somebody", it more often than not turns into a networking event, not friendship. In such groups, we start asserting our carefully built identities. There is performance and projection. And so, drinks, game nights, and general hanging-out-activities in the city do give us acquaintances but rarely friends. Then dejected, we reminisce about the comforts of our childhood friendships and wonder why nothing matches up to what it felt like once. We blame our busy schedules. But it is not time that we’re short on, it is a lack of formative experience often rooted in collective vulnerability that is unable to bind us together.
English
19
53
555
27.3K
dax
dax@thdxr·
guys what if claude isn't getting dumber what if you're getting dumber
English
117
39
852
44K
creativcoder
creativcoder@creativcoder·
@skydotcs The dark knight for rust we don't deserve, but that we need.
English
0
0
0
30
creativcoder
creativcoder@creativcoder·
L-sits feels better on these as I can exercise more range of motion
creativcoder tweet media
English
0
0
2
168