
an LLM would say the color is blue. @heurai_ai’s architecture reasons logically that the user has not provided enough supporting detail ( where, when, etc) to give a near perfect answer this is gonna kill openai and claude
devooor
48 posts


an LLM would say the color is blue. @heurai_ai’s architecture reasons logically that the user has not provided enough supporting detail ( where, when, etc) to give a near perfect answer this is gonna kill openai and claude


Now what's doing well enough to buy given that there may be a truce? Anthropic? SpaceX, OpenAI?

an LLM would say the color is blue. @heurai_ai’s architecture reasons logically that the user has not provided enough supporting detail ( where, when, etc) to give a near perfect answer this is gonna kill openai and claude






病院行ったら先生にちょっとまるいねと言われた







Marc Andreessen says don’t ever do diamonds in the rough. Only do diamonds. "This is actually an investor ego thing, I think, which is you basically say, 'Wow, I'm the investor that's gonna go find the thing that nobody else knows about... I'm going to go do the thing nobody else can think of.'" "The general pattern is... if it's got merit to be investable for venture, there are a lot of really smart and hungry VCs out there, and they are working extremely hard to sniff these things out, and it's their full-time job, and it's all they do." "I think it's really unusual to have the diamond in the rough, and usually if it's the diamond in the rough, it usually means two things... a company that's offside in some fundamental reason, it's in the wrong place, or it's structured wrong." "There's a reason why it's a diamond in the rough that actually ends up becoming a big problem." @pmarca with @HarryStebbings

I am a delusional optimist and i will win I am a delusional optimist and i will win I am a delusional optimist and i will win I am a delusional optimist and i will win I am a delusional optimist and i will win I am a delusional optimist and i will win