Pinned Tweet
Onat Aksaray
77.4K posts

Onat Aksaray
@OnatAksaray
Building profitable personal brands on X & LI | $750/mo @ 9-5 → 16M+ views & $ 15k/mo by writing online | Want the exact system? Click the link below.
Free X Simplified Guide → Joined Eylül 2011
1.1K Following7.4K Followers

The most expensive meeting you take this week might already be on your calendar.
Because no real qualification happened before it was booked.
Instead of moving the deal forward, the meeting is being used for basic screening.
Some form of pre-qualification, whether manual or automated, should usually happen before anyone sees your calendar.
But automating lead qualification is not always the right move.
If you’re early, still learning your market, or selling something high-trust and nuanced, manual qualification can be the smarter path.
The bigger problem is when qualification happens too late.
Too often, qualification happens on the discovery call itself. And if the prospect is not a fit, that time is already gone.
In practice, most businesses qualify leads in 4 ways:
1️⃣ DMs / email - Great early on. Hard to scale later.
2️⃣ Forms - Good for structured intake. Weak when the buyer still has questions.
3️⃣ On the call - Sometimes necessary. But expensive if basic screening is happening live on every call.
The problem with 2 and 3: prospects who still have a quick question before they’re ready to book a call or fill out a form will often drop off.
4️⃣ Conversational AI - Bridges that gap. It answers questions, qualifies fit, and guides the next step... all in one flow.
That's the layer I think a lot of funnels are missing.
✓ Not more traffic.
✓ Not more calls.
✓ Just a better way to move interested prospects forward.
The video below shows what that can look like…
An AI agent answers initial questions, qualifies the lead conversationally, and only then presents the calendar if they are qualified. If someone isn’t a fit, it can guide them to a better next step instead of pushing everyone down the same path.
And importantly, it doesn’t have to feel robotic.
If the AI is in the middle of qualifying someone and they interrupt with a quick question, it can answer naturally, then continue the flow.
The goal isn't replacing sales.
It’s reducing friction for the buyer, protecting your team’s time, and making it easier for the right prospects to get qualified and booked in the same flow.
One important boundary, though: when a prospect asks something that requires custom strategy… like what your approach would look like for their specific business or situation… the AI shouldn’t answer for your team.
It should recognize that moment and guide the prospect toward a consultation.
That’s where the human layer still matters most.
If you want to try the flow from the video, here’s a demo agent you can test:
@prismagrowth" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">surfn.ai/@prismagrowth
I also wrote a deeper guide on when to automate lead qualification… and when not to. Full guide in comments.
Curious… which approach has worked best for your business so far?
English

I spent 10 years closing $1.2M enterprise deals at companies like McCann, Autodesk, Criteo.
I learned how to extract maximum value from every negotiation.
Then I became a closer and coach for a top UGC program and looked at what UGC creators were accepting.
And I realized... you're getting robbed.
UGC rates dropped 44% in one year. The average creator now makes $198 per video.
That's not a market shift. That's brands exploiting desperation.
You know what separates $400 closers from $1,200 closers?
They know how to leverage the conversation. They know what to say when brands push back.
They understand pricing psychology, not because they studied it for a video course.
Because they’ve cold emailed and cold called a million CFOs and CMOs and figured out rejection is okay and how to make the say yes.
I built the Closer Kit for creators who are done accepting less.
English

Hopped on call with a founder over three months ago
who had an interesting approach to fundraising,
he was methodical.
He built a spreadsheet of 600 investors,
segmented by stage, sector, check size, geography.
Spent 3 weeks writing personalized cold emails to all 600 of them.
Tracked opens, replies, click rates. optimized subject lines and a/b tested the opening paragraph.
treated it like an outbound sales campaign
I asked him what the results were '11 replies, 4 calls and 1 term sheet that fell through at the last minute.
7 months of his life' he did everything right by the playbook. and the playbook failed him.
Here's what the playbook never explains:
investors who take cold email meetings are often the investors with the most availability
and investors with the most availability often have the most availability for a reason.
The best investors are not sitting in their inbox waiting
to be discovered by a cold email they already have deal flow.
They have networks that bring them the best deals before anyone else sees them.
Cold email gets you the leftovers and the 'maybe' pile.
and the people who have time.
Pre-committed capital means the money is already looking for the deal not the other way around.
Your job is to qualify, structure your company correctly
and show up to a committed table instead of a cold inbox.
DM me COLD and I'll explain the difference in how the process actually runs.
Anton@theantonchain
The 4 filters to apply before any outreach: → Stage: Do they lead at my stage? (pre-seed / seed / Series A) → Check size: Does their typical check fit in my round? → Sector: Have they invested in my space in the last 3 years? → Geography: Do they invest in my region? (matters more than people think) A fund that passes all 4 filters is worth 50 pitches to funds that fail any one.
English

I thought I was disorganized.
Turns out… my tools were.
Studies show the average knowledge worker uses 10+ tools daily and switches between them 1,200 times.
That's not a discipline problem. That's a design problem.
Your workspace should work with your brain, not against it.
@fluxo_app


English

Work for yourself first so you can work for others later.
We were created to create. Doing anything less is not doing Gods work.
So get out there and build.
Build your legacy. Leave your mark on the world.
Because even if you fail, you could always go back to a 9-5 “Just Over Broke.”
Your worst case scenario are most people’s realities.
English
Onat Aksaray retweeted

Harsh truth:
More volume won't fix anything.
My client was in disbelief.
He was posting 3x a day.
He was engaging 50x a day
He was dming people 10x a day.
Results: Nothing.
No engagement.
No growth.
No leads.
So we made a few changes.
But we didn't change the inputs.
He is still posting 3x a day.
He is still engaging 50x a day
He is still dming people 10x a day.
But..
He is getting 10x the engagement now.
He is getting leads.
He is growing.
If you post 3x a day with no results..
Posting 10x a day won't change anything.
It's not about what you do.
It's about how you do it.
If you have the right strategy..
Same inputs can create different results.
English

I made an entire free X training.
Writing your first tweet to signing high ticket clients on X..
I got you. Here's the sauce:
youtube.com/watch?v=E3vXMI…

YouTube
English
Onat Aksaray retweeted

@OnatAksaray The hardest part isn’t starting.
It’s continuing when nothing is happening, if u did that gratz u deserve it!👌
English

@OnatAksaray giving up costs more than keeping going.
that's the whole game. you only lose when you stop.
I am still on my early days but yeah showing up everyday🙌
English

@OnatAksaray Most people quit right before the compounding kicks in. Showing up when there's no proof it's working yet is the actual skill, everything else is just execution. 🔥
English

@OnatAksaray That grind is real, but showing up despite the grind builds the momentum you need—keep pushing, the payoff's coming.
English

@OnatAksaray When we try we still get a chance, but if we give up, we lose that precious chance to change our bloodline
English

@OnatAksaray Go all the way if you start
Don’t ever let it go halfway
English








