Sithembiso Magutshwa

SA

@MmusiMaimane I wish you remembered this wisdom when Zuma was arrested without trial. Better late than never, I suppose.

BREAKING NEWS "in respect of count 1 you are sentenced to a period of 5 years imprisonment, in respect of count two you are sentenced to a period of 2 years imprisonment, in respect of count 3 you are sentenced to R20,000 or to undergo six months imprisonment" Judge Twanet Olivier sentences EFF President Julius Malema

𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗲𝗳𝘀 𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗜𝘁 𝗙𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗰𝘂𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗪𝗶𝗻𝘀 ✅✅✅✅✅ Kaizer Chiefs with a convincing 4-1 win over relegation-battlers Magesi at the Peter Mokaba Stadium. ✌️ Da Silva 33' ✌️ Duba 37' ✌️ Shabalala 62' 🐊 Mofokeng 69' ✌️ Mayo 83' #Amakhosi4Life

The boy desperately needed that goal damn, I'm super happy for Mayo rhaaaaaaaaaaaaaàaaaa.

Mayo Mayo Beautiful header 🔥

Well done Mayo👏👏👏👏👏

@PuleZtro A thing of beauty.

One thing about Reeve Frosler is that he will always deliver that inch perfect quality cross inside the box for attacker's to finish. Great header by Khanyisa Mayo💯👌🙌

Frosler🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌

you gotta pray man… even on your best day

@PhumlaniMMajozi Until Geraldine changed the rules in 1995/6, Africans didn’t receive any social grants. Only Coloured and Indian people did. My parents received their pension once every two months, and even that was less than what whites received. Glorify apartheid by all means, just use facts.

I found this beautiful verse, Isaiah 46:4. “I have made you. I will carry you; I will sustain you and I will rescue you.”

A loan for what? They are re-commissioning their coal & nuclear plants, but they must give us loans to destroy our capability as they did?

On Phala-Phala: it is irrational for parliament to establish an independent panel to determine if the president has a case to answer. When this panel says he does have a case, then they subject the same decision to a vote. It cannot be a matter of vote as to whether someone has a case to answer or not! It is simply a matter based on facts and evidence! Which an independent panel of experts has long established! The ConCourt MUST rule in favour of the EFF. Ramaphosa must go in front of an impeachment committee, face interrogation on all the Phala-Phala matters. After his answers, this committee can write a report with recommendations. And only then can an impeachment vote take place. Simple!

Political Parties talking about developing the capacity of the State whilst deliberately underfunding it, enabling privatisation and leading to runaway cost increases.

What’s with ministers and giving Chinese cars to family and friends, and no declaration in parliament? This is not the face of renewal. You will find though, those who said the minister must go, will not say this other minister must go. Meanwhile Mubikwa is quiet as usual. Damage

White Privilege is a disease

Imagine; the only reason, the truly single reason the US is at war with Iran is because Trump hated Obama so much that he went to tear his deal with Iran. He tossed it into the dustbin. A deal that WORKED! Now he doesn’t know HOW the hell to fix the situation. But watch the space: history’s humour is about to take him back to the trash can. HE HAS TO GET OBAMA’s deal b(l)ack!

I’m glad they are taking over this case. Continue with your investigation @wicks_jeff .

Dear @PublicProtector Upon critically engaging your report on the Phala Phala matter, I must express profound concern at its formalistic and ultimately underpowered reasoning. Your report correctly identifies the applicable legal framework but adopts an unduly narrow and formalistic approach in its application. In relation to section 34(1) of PRECCA, it acknowledges that a failure to report may constitute a criminal offense, yet retreats on the basis that criminal liability falls outside your mandate. While that is correct in respect of guilt, it does not absolve you, under section 182, from determining whether the conduct amounts to improper or unlawful conduct. PRECCA should inform that assessment, not operate as a jurisdictional barrier. Very disappointing! A similar formalism appears in the treatment of section 96. By drawing a rigid distinction between “paid work” and “financial interest,” the report adopts an overly technical interpretation that overlooks the constitutional purpose of preventing conflicts between public office and private commercial benefit. The inquiry should extend beyond day-to-day involvement to whether continued financial benefit and ultimate control constitute impermissible economic participation. Furthermore, the report is further weakened by internal inconsistency. It finds no abuse of state resources by the President yet acknowledges that SAPS members, including the Presidential Protection Unit, acted unlawfully and outside proper procedures, including an unofficial investigation without a registered case. I'm convinced you know the meaning of causation and accountability in our jurisprudence....... You are a public protector and not a private protector ! In addition, the report relies on the absence of evidence while simultaneously recognising an irregular investigative process. It accepts key explanations without rigorous evidentiary testing yet reaches definitive conclusions of compliance, effectively conflating the absence of proof with proof of absence. Your report merely tinkers with the President’s conduct, engaging it at a superficial level while avoiding the substantive constitutional questions that arise on the facts. In doing so, it fails to meaningfully interrogate the convergence of private interest, state involvement, and irregular conduct. This approach creates the impression of a predetermined effort to absolve rather than to rigorously assess. WE SEE YOU !

Why StarLink is desperate to enter South Africa, despite Elon Musk hating the country.