Physiocrat

21.3K posts

Physiocrat banner
Physiocrat

Physiocrat

@BTCTalks

The West will be saved by macho castizos

Se unió Ocak 2014
1.2K Siguiendo1.4K Seguidores
Physiocrat retuiteado
captain S.O
captain S.O@sow413·
To my American friends, I want to speak from the heart, because this moment truly moved me as a Japanese citizen. When President Trump made that Pearl Harbor joke, it wasn’t just humor to us. It felt like a weight I’d carried my whole life was suddenly lifted. My chest tightened, and honestly, tears came close. For 80 long years, we Japanese have lived under a heavy shadow — the constant expectation to apologize, to reflect, to stay in “guilt mode.” Even though we’re the closest of allies, that old wound never fully healed. We felt bound by the past, by the Constitution America helped write for us, always a little smaller, always needing to prove we were sorry enough. But in that single joke, Trump did something powerful. He turned a painful history into a shared laugh between equals. It was like he was saying: “Hey, it was a long time ago. We’re good. Let’s move forward — as brothers.” No more endless atonement. No more living in the shadow of being the “former enemy.” The curse broke. Japan feels free to stand tall again. Right now, cherry blossoms are blooming beautifully all across Japan. 🌸 This spring, the sakura feels like a perfect symbol — a fresh beginning. Not two nations stuck in old roles, but true equals, proud brothers, shoulder to shoulder, ready to build the future together. To the American people: We don’t want to be subordinates forever. We want to be your real partners — strong, proud, and loyal. The kind of allies who ride or die together. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, America. The strongest alliance in the world is rising again — as equals, as brothers, forever. #PhoenixRising 🇯🇵🤝🇺🇸🌸
English
3.5K
6K
47K
1.2M
EverettW
EverettW@EverettWery·
@BTCTalks @MattWalshBlog I would argue because there's not a truly independent from the government airline. If there was, it would be the best.
English
1
0
0
15
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
Flight delayed on tarmac. Missed our connection. Based on the other flights available, which were also delayed, and the fact that taking a flight tomorrow would require getting back into a security line stretching seemingly for miles, we decided to get a car and drive five hours to our destination. That’s how bad air travel is right now. Driving is faster. Air travel is awful in this country. People don’t realize just how much it sucks unless they have to do it a lot. It’s not just TSA. Flight delays. Air traffic control issues. Service is even worse than usual. Every airport is crowded and slow and worn down and dirty. Everyone brings their dogs. The term “service animal” doesn’t mean anything anymore. Air travel used to be luxurious. People used to wear suits. Working for an airline was prestigious. The employees took it seriously. It sucks now. It’s terrible. This is the kind of thing our leaders should be fixing. Because the most frustrating thing is that it is so eminently fixable. If only anyone bothered to try.
English
2.3K
1.6K
22.2K
1.6M
Physiocrat
Physiocrat@BTCTalks·
@EverettWery @MattWalshBlog That’s a completely separate issue. Of course we need to end the humiliation ritual that is TSA. Leave security to the airlines. That said, the best airlines in the world are all govt sponsored.
English
1
0
0
14
EverettW
EverettW@EverettWery·
@BTCTalks @MattWalshBlog Sorry should have clarified after the 1978 de-regulation it improved significantly but has deteriorated after 9/11. It would much better if the government got out of security and created more free market and less regulation.
English
2
0
1
53
EverettW
EverettW@EverettWery·
@MattWalshBlog It's because the government got involved in air transportation. Too much regulation causes increased cost and worse service. Get the government out of air travel and things will get better overnight.
English
4
0
24
3.3K
Physiocrat
Physiocrat@BTCTalks·
Just had lunch with an old money Bohemian Club guy who was talking of the prescience of a century old book written by an obscure Austrian painter. Wild times.
English
0
0
0
15
AGAVE
AGAVE@agave_redux·
I'm beginning to suspect the old folklore tales and warnings of cave trolls, goblins, and witches originate way older than we think. "Skewed in one direction"...that would be the raping. They raped our women and we killed them. Then told stories to our children to warn them of the dangers.
The Wall Street Journal@WSJ

Sexual encounters between Neanderthals and ancient humans skewed in one direction—mostly between male Neanderthals and female humans on.wsj.com/4tewdVu

English
101
368
7.4K
1.1M
Physiocrat retuiteado
Roman Helmet Guy
Roman Helmet Guy@romanhelmetguy·
In the Late American Republic, Congress became a vestigial organ. While legislative power was still nominally vested in this body, the high degree of consensus required to pass any legislation, combined with the roughly even and increasingly hostile division of the populace into the Reds and the Blues, prevented any major reforms from being enacted. The only true power remaining in the body rested in its ability to veto the President's military expenditures as well as his choice of ministers. To keep the government from failing completely, exceptions to the usual high vote threshold were carved out for the appointment of ministers. But the veto power over military expenditures was increasingly exercised. For historical reasons, military expenditures had to be approved by Congress yearly. This was in marked contrast to the vast majority of the government's actual expenditures (cash, food, and other in-kind payments to the poor and elderly), which were funded in perpetuity and thus elevated above the annual machinations of this fickle body. The controversy around military expenditures typically centered around the border troops and internal security forces. The Blues enjoyed marked support from the Mesoamericans who had recently migrated into the empire, and thus wished to minimize the number and efficacy of these troops in order to allow more such foreigners to slip through the empire's porous borders. Meanwhile, in public, the Reds supported drastically increasing spending on these border guards. But privately, many were beholden to the large landowners who employed these new arrivals on their plantations. Because of this dynamic, by the end of the 2020s, between 1 in 10 and 1 in 5 Americans were descended from ancestors who had managed to evade these border guards (their descendants were granted full citizenship by virtue of having been born on American soil). This dynamic continued until tensions between the Blues and the Reds boiled over. The power base of the Blues consisted of recently arrived Mesoamericans (as stated previously), but also the learned class of Europeans that constituted the administrative layers of the governmental and corporate bureaucracies, in addition to the descendants of freed African slaves. All of these groups were overwhelmingly urban. In contrast, the power base of the Reds consisted of the vast European rural peasantry that still constituted the plurality of Late Republican society, in addition to the commercially-minded merchants, traders, and plantation owners who were wary of the growing tax power of the administrative class. There was also a marked sex divide: women tended to favor the Blues, while men favored the Reds. The Blues were reformists and revolutionaries, the Reds conservatives and traditionalists. The aim of the Blues was the creation of a powerful state with wide-sweeping powers to tax the commerce of rich Reds in order to fund the distribution of food, shelter, medicine, and cash payments to their core base of poor urban Mesoamericans and Africans. This state was (of course) to be administered by the learned class of Blue bureaucrats. The aim of the Reds was divided. Their core rural base wished to return to the social and political arrangements of the Middle Republic. They especially harkening back to what they saw as the era of America's greatest prosperity, the 1950s (when America had emerged as the only major power whose lands were largely unscathed from the Second European War). Meanwhile the rich Reds sought primarily to tighten their monopoly on the Late Republic's land and commerce, and resist the encroachments of the Blue-backed administrative state. Demographic momentum was on the side of the Blues. However, in the mid-2020s, the Reds swept to power across all government bodies, riding a wave of anti-Blue sentiment. Yet, due to the aforementioned Red divide and the previously stated high vote threshold required to enact major reform, the Reds only managed to stall the momentum of the Blues, not reverse it. The porous border was closed, many migrants were rounded up in the interior of the republic, but no major laws were enacted that could've consolidated the Reds' power. And the rich Reds undermined their own power base by continuing to push for more migrants to be allowed into the republic to serve as cheap labor in their enterprises. A dissatisfied and fickle populace swept the Blues back into power. The tactics the Reds had used to round up migrants in the interior of the republic had shocked the power base of the Blues, and even many of those who normally supported the Reds came out against it. This became the Blue's pretense for doing away with the high vote threshold required to enact major reform (the threshold had only ever been a technicality based on governing norms, and was easily dispensed with once those norms were no longer seen as sacred). Suddenly Congress became not only powerful, but nearly all-powerful. The number of judges in the highest court was increased. The new appointees were all Blues, they served for life, and could not be removed. This ensured perpetual Blue control of judicial functions. A Mesoamerican protectorate was elevated into a State and given representation in Congress. The capital city, highly urban and Blue, was also turned into a State and given representation. This ensured perpetual Blue control of the legislative functions. And the Blue legislative majority then enacted voting reforms that heavily favored Blue Presidential candidates. These reforms were rubber-stamped by the Blue judiciary, ensuring perpetual Blue control of the executive function as well.
English
62
237
2.2K
67.9K
Physiocrat
Physiocrat@BTCTalks·
@cloneristic Whitney Webb has some powerful tism which results in exhaustive research but she's ODd on redpills and is too jaded.
English
0
0
1
18
Cloneristic
Cloneristic@cloneristic·
These long game set up knockdowns always seem to be in the works, but I don't know. It may just be there are some people in the CIA and other agencies who are personally aggrieved by the brazen outrageousness of Mossad antics and Jewish corruption, who are at odds with the zog operative faction. Tucker is supposedly having his family's live's threatened which has a way of putting your back against the wall. When you start to have plausible concern that these people are out to kill you or stage false flag attacks to murder scores of Americans in domestic terror attacks that's not consistent with allyship. That's firmly enemy territory. The people that work in the government can go online too. They are getting red pilled like everyone else is. The war is very unpopular and everyone knows why it happened. Everyone knows the US government is a pathetic prostitute of the Israelis. How long can this gonna go on? People are gonna start to defect even in high places. The total lockdown of everything by the Jews is an artifact of boomerism. Millenials on down aren't gonna go for it. Barely Gen X. The only reason some of them are invested in the Talmud system is because some of them still own houses. The rest dgaf. There's nothing in it for them to play ball.
Sense Receptor@SenseReceptor

🤯Whitney Webb pitches mind-blowing theory on Joe Kent's real narrative purpose: engineer "anti-semitic, right-leaning domestic terrorists" to feed to the "pre-crime" machine: "[Kent's] an intelligence officer and top CIA guy." "Be careful in trusting 'former spooks' who come out of nowhere and are saying what you want to hear right away." "Basically, the first Trump administration defined the rising domestic terror threat because after 9/11 they've been building all this infrastructure for a war on domestic terror. Every administration has advanced it, Democrat and Republican. So who are they saying the domestic terrorists are? Anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists." "I worry when people from that exact nexus that existed in [Trump's first administration] come out and are trying to get Right-leaning populists in particular to do things that the Trump administration itself—even if no one else agrees with the definition—would define as anti-Semitic." This clip of Webb (@_whitneywebb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (@jimmy_dore) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Dore: "What do you make of Joe Kent?" Webb: "Yeah, so with Joe Kent, he's a intelligence officer and top CIA guy. I think a lot of stuff is going on right now, and I'm not exactly sure how I feel about it. But I think people should be careful in trusting former, quote–unquote, former spooks who come out of nowhere and are saying what you want to hear right away. Because a lot of times what happens is that these figures will do that to build up trust with the public and then they'll misdirect you somewhere else if you're not careful. "So I would advise vigilance and critical thinking, which is often in short supply, but should not be, about, that figure in, in particular. But I think— Dore: "So you think there's like, there might be some kind of a long-game plan with Joe Kent?" Webb: "Oh, yeah. So you saw—" Dore: "So, so I've heard this argument and, and that you know, don't take him as face value, that they're just setting him up to be the next Trump or JD Vance or something and then he's going to do all the horrible thing. So that's—" Webb: "They could. It's very possible, but I don't know how it'll go. But let me give you an example of why I'm really skeptical of him. "So when Trump was, I encourage people to go back and look at the first iteration of the Trump administration to understand what's happening now. And since my career in journalism began during Trump's first term, I thankfully remember a good amount of it. "So, about a year before the January Six event, there was this DHS official and this is the Trump administration, Elizabeth Neuman, I think her name was. She was basically saying, there's going to be a domestic terror event. We can see it building, but we can't quite stop it. It's another 9/11. Oh no. If only we had more surveillance powers and whatever, we could maybe stop this other imminent 9/11, whatever. "And so basically in that hearing, it was a hearing where she was testifying. Top officials from DHS and, and other intelligence agencies were basically painting who is the up-and-coming domestic terrorist profile in the United States, what Americans are domestic terrorists. "And so basically, the— I, I really wish I could remember the specific name of the hearing to direct people to that because it is on C-SPAN, still. But basically, the profile they gave were anti-Semitic Trump supporters or anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists. So I worry when people from that exact nexus that existed in Trump One come out and are trying to get Right-leaning populists in particular to do things that the Trump administration itself, even if it, no one else agrees with the definition, would define as anti-Semitic." Dore: "So, so what I— explain that again to me because you lost me a little bit right at the end. So you're saying that—" Webb: "Okay, so basically the first Trump administration defined the rising domestic terror threat because after 9/11 they've been building all this infrastructure for a war on domestic terror. Every administration has advanced it, Democrat and Republican. So who are they saying the domestic terrorists are? Anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists." Dore: "And so do you think Joe Kent is, is one of those?" Webb: "So before this era they had the domestic terror threat they were trying to put in front of you were obviously these groups of like Feds, like Patriot Front and the Proud Boys. And all of that. Okay, so how, if you, if, if you can't fake the demographic, how do you engineer the demographic?... "So basically if you have Trump officials that are part of this apparatus claiming right-leaning anti- Semites are domestic terrorists that need to be targeted by this infrastructure and the surveillance infrastructure, in pre-crime and all of that, that's been a part of this buildup of the war on domestic terror. And then you have people coming out and being like we're going to blame, you know, you know, saying what people want to hear because obviously Israel absolutely is intimately involved with getting us involved in the Iran war. "But the other side of it is you create— you, you signal boost that with people like Joe Kent potentially. And then you have people sort of muddy the waters between Israel and all Jewish people, which is not fair. And then you can have the Trump administration swoop in and you know, look at Alexis Wilkins. Foreign government operators are driving these narratives. "It's, it's like reverse Russiagate. And well, I mean I probably should have thought this theory a little bit more before explaining it on your show, but basically I worry that someone like Joe Kent is coming out of, out of nowhere to try and sort of engineer this problem that the US Government has had is we can't make domestic terrorists appear that fit our profile. "So now we want people to create a class of right- leaning populists who basically fit our definition. If we just define anti-Semites as people who are critical of Israel and then we can target these people with our domestic terror infrastructure. So I worry that could be happening."

English
3
2
27
1.8K
Physiocrat retuiteado
ゴリラ@エクソダス号海底2万マイル
イラン「交渉相手はヴァンス副大統領が良い!」 メディア「イランは賢い、ヴァンスはイラン戦争に反対している。」 ヴァンス「…しろ」 イラン&メディア「?」 ヴァンス「イランはアメリカに感謝しろ あなたは今日一日、一回でもありがとうと言いましたか?スーツも着てないし、無礼ですよ」
ゴリラ@エクソダス号海底2万マイル tweet media
日本語
99
1.2K
11.2K
835.6K
Physiocrat
Physiocrat@BTCTalks·
Erin Burnett was my favorite on CNBC in the late aughts. Then she went to CNN and got full blown TDS which resulted in her putting on 100 lbs. glad to see Ozempic is bringing her back.
Acyn@Acyn

CNN: Sources are telling CNN Iran is actively preparing for an invasion of Kharg Island. The traps that we understand that are being put there: anti-personnel and anti-armor mines placed around the island. Tehran is also moving a large number of troops and air defenses to this island.

English
0
0
0
108
Physiocrat
Physiocrat@BTCTalks·
@dpinsen @MainstreamViews Who installed the Shah? I’m keenly aware of the history and geography of the ME. Persia was a great nation. If not for foreign meddling (oil) they might still be. This is a result of the ‘rules based order and our greatest ally’.
English
1
0
4
76
David Pinsen
David Pinsen@dpinsen·
@BTCTalks @MainstreamViews Iran isn’t all desert and there’s evidence in the history of the last 49 years. One of the first things the Islamic Republic of Iran did was invade the U.S. embassy and take American citizens hostage. The Persian Gulf would be an important region if Israel didn’t exist too.
English
2
0
2
212
Future Moldovan Citizen
Future Moldovan Citizen@MainstreamViews·
False dichotomy between supporting the Iran war and being a Palestine flag waving third worldist. You can simply affirm Israel's right to exist in its current borders (satisfies the boomers, puts you at odds with leftists) while opposing retarded open ended wars on their behalf
malmesburyman@malmesburyman

Moreover the attempt to make Israel a wedge on the right (which, despite the noise on here, has not been successful at scale) is the result of leftist anti-MAGA mirroring & provocation. The coalition we have supports Israel. You either make your peace with that, or with leftism.

English
77
9
210
59.1K