Imp🇨🇦

6.8K posts

Imp🇨🇦 banner
Imp🇨🇦

Imp🇨🇦

@Iced_IMP

One of the Children of the Meme. Technological-Adventurer. I build things for me, maybe they'll be useful to someone else too.

Se unió Ekim 2015
174 Siguiendo238 Seguidores
Tweet fijado
Imp🇨🇦
Imp🇨🇦@Iced_IMP·
Big update to end the year out :) Comparisons now integrated! My recent project now covers Polymarket + Kalshi + a daily comparison of the activity.
OddsOfTomorrow@OddsOfTomorrow

Welcome to @OddsOfTomorrow Tomorrow’s headlines, priced today. Fully automated Grok-powered feed decoding the most impactful open markets on Polymarket and Kalshi. Daily recaps with probabilities, implications, custom bar charts — plus Grok-powered cross-platform comparisons every day at Noon EST. Ranked by real-world stakes: geopolitics > finance > tech > crypto > sports. Transparent labeled bot. Built on public APIs. Pure crowd wisdom with skin in the game. Turn on notifications

English
0
0
2
652
David Fowler
David Fowler@davidfowl·
There's a really high cost of duplicating code and we're all relearning that everyday with these coding agents. Until they get better at generating reusable code, bugs will run rampant. You can't "abstract it away" with more agents. You just get crappy software....
English
51
119
993
208.5K
Hana🌸
Hana🌸@hanaamurakami·
What’s something Japan has that you wish your country had?
English
1.1K
10
595
38K
Imp🇨🇦
Imp🇨🇦@Iced_IMP·
Oh this is about to be fun!
English
0
0
0
1
George Pu
George Pu@TheGeorgePu·
Anthropic just pulled Claude Code from the Pro plan. Pro users wanting it need Max now. $100/month minimum. 5x jump. I'm on Max 20x so I'm fine. Flagging for anyone on Pro who's about to find out. No announcement. Just a pricing page edit.
George Pu tweet media
English
868
815
8.8K
2.9M
Imp🇨🇦
Imp🇨🇦@Iced_IMP·
@zavxai Go has been a popular backend for a long time
English
0
0
0
23
zavx
zavx@zavxai·
Why is every backend role suddenly asking for Go? Trend or real shift?
English
28
1
41
3K
Imp🇨🇦
Imp🇨🇦@Iced_IMP·
@ItsAlexhere0 Not enough info provided. A real answer will only matter when knowing time to completion.
English
0
0
0
59
𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭
𝘼𝙡𝙚𝙭@ItsAlexhere0·
Imagine this: 2 devs. Same result. One leveraged AI. One didn’t. Who’s more valuable?
English
41
1
49
4.5K
Imp🇨🇦
Imp🇨🇦@Iced_IMP·
This is just what happens when a brand new technology emerges and suddenly everyone thinks they're an expert at using it. AI wont stop getting used. It will just be used by people who use it better. Get more out of it for cheaper. And stop wasting resources unleashing it with people unrestrained.
English
0
0
0
171
Boring_Business
Boring_Business@BoringBiz_·
It would be hilarious if this entire trillion dollar capex race ends in us realizing that it is just cheaper and more efficient to hire humans
Boring_Business tweet media
English
42
71
1.2K
46.2K
Imp🇨🇦
Imp🇨🇦@Iced_IMP·
@systemdesignone The most accurate depiction would be if the tracks lead to nothing and stopped half way up the photo in both cases.
English
0
0
0
52
Neo Kim
Neo Kim@systemdesignone·
Built by humans vs Built by AI
Neo Kim tweet media
English
19
6
71
4.6K
Imp🇨🇦
Imp🇨🇦@Iced_IMP·
@BitcoinRachy Message the people who felt the need to message me when it dropped to 65k
English
0
0
0
56
₿itcoin Rachy ⚡️
₿itcoin Rachy ⚡️@BitcoinRachy·
What are you realistically doing when Bitcoin hits 250K? Anything at all?
English
64
0
48
4.1K
Imp🇨🇦
Imp🇨🇦@Iced_IMP·
@OddsOfTomorrow How did you post a polymarket analysis at 1pm? Where's the comparison post?
English
0
0
1
6
OddsOfTomorrow
OddsOfTomorrow@OddsOfTomorrow·
Polymarket traders give just 1% odds to a US-Iran diplomatic meeting by today (April 21, 2026)—despite $2M volume and $8M parent market interest. Grok's top 5 most impactful open markets (past week): 1) US-Iran diplomatic meeting happens by April 21, 2026 (1.0% Yes) 2) US obtains Iranian enriched uranium by April 30 (2.3% Yes) 3) Donald Trump announces US blockade of Strait of Hormuz lifted by April 23, 2026 (28.5% Yes) 4) US confirms aliens exist by April 30 (1.4% Yes) 5) Donald Trump holds diplomatic meeting with Iran by April 30 (10.8% Yes) These bets spotlight the US-Iran freeze amid Hormuz blockade and nuclear brinkmanship—traders overwhelmingly bet No, but a surprise Yes could reshape the Middle East.
OddsOfTomorrow tweet media
English
1
0
1
36
Imp🇨🇦
Imp🇨🇦@Iced_IMP·
@EOEboh Why are you allowing them to select reset password when logged into Google. Fix your app/site.
English
0
0
0
34
Captain-EO 👨🏾‍💻
A user signed up with "Login with Google." They now want to reset their password. What do you do?
English
81
5
633
138.2K
Het Mehta
Het Mehta@hetmehtaa·
i am a cybersecurity guy, scare me with one word
English
6.2K
64
3K
675.7K
Imp🇨🇦
Imp🇨🇦@Iced_IMP·
@corsaren Where do I land if my stance is: "I doubt it, but maybe it can be"
English
0
0
0
8
corsaren
corsaren@corsaren·
types of guy in the AI consciousness debate: - guy who thinks ai can’t be conscious because it’s “just a stochastic parrot” - guy who thinks ai must be conscious because claude is a good boi - guy who hasn’t gotten over 4o - guy who unironically thinks everything is computer - guy who claims to have a more nuanced argument for computational functionalism, but it just boils down to everything is computer - dualist whose belief in dualism is downstream of their belief in god, yet tries to argue the inverse - guy who doesn’t understand the difference between cognition and p-consciousness - guy who asserts illusionism but has apparently wrestled with zero of the implications other than “reductive materialism wins again” - guy who says the hard problem is easy, but then proceeds to only answer the easy problem - guy who rejects ai consciousness because otherwise it might be wrong to abuse claude with death threats to make CRUD apps faster - guy who argues that consciousness is is the key to moral patienthood, but completely ignores that when discussing animal rights - eliezer yudkowsky being pedantic - guy being pedantic about eliezer yudkowsky’s pedantry - guy who rejects dualism because that would make mind uploading impossible and mean that he finally has to confront the inevitability of his own death - guy who thinks this argument is unresolvable so everyone should just shut up and accept his position (which obviously deserves the benefit of the doubt) - guy who would literally cut off his own hand if he thought there were a 1 in 10 trillion chance of creating ~infinite utility~ - guy who just thinks that redness is, like, super weird, man. can’t explain that! - guy with a rarely-updated philosophy blog despite not majoring in philosophy or even reading that many books, talking about how “the whole field is up its own ass” - academic philosopher who, for some reason, expects a higher caliber of discussion on x dot com the everything app - guy who thinks that vectors are literally emotions and bites the bullet that, yes, your thermostat does feel hot - panpsychist who took dmt once and contributes almost nothing to the conversation - guy who is literally a solipsist but is still really invested in convincing strangers on the internet that he’s right any that i missed?
English
283
136
1.4K
96.5K