DAVIE McDAVEFACE 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇵🇸💙🚴🚵

And today's court case: That's a most probable disqualification. The driver had 6 points already from driving with no insurance in 2024, and was found guilty almost immediately of phone driving today. He's now due for a Saturday disqualification court hearing as he will likely be disqualified from driving.

OMG!! This journalist is reporting that Israel has slit the throats of ten children and placed them on the side of the road , all of whom were less than 5 years old. “I saw all of this with my own eyes; I am a witness to this thing.”

LTNs move traffic to the already busy roads. And with it air pollution.

The police are under no obligation whatsoever to inform the general public of the progress of a live investigation. Why? Because if media (and social media loons) get hold of the wrong suspect's ID and details and spread it around, not only will it impede the police investigation, but it will also potentially ruin the life of an innocent person. In extreme cases, even if they have identified someone that police believes is the right person, publicity can be so overwhelming that their defence team could argue that there is no possibility of that person ever getting a fair trial as a result of the pre-trial publicity. We have "innocent until proven guilty" as a concept for a reason. Tommy the Sniff ended up being convicted of contempt of court in 2019 for interfering in trials, not just once but after he was already warned that it was dangerous to do so. This is what the High Court said about his case: - His online publication of details about the criminal case involved a breach of a reporting restriction order imposed under s4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. - The content of what he published online gave rise to a substantial risk that the course of justice in the criminal case would be seriously impeded, thereby amounting to a breach of the rule of contempt law known as “the strict liability rule”. - By aggressively confronting and filming some of the defendants in that case as they arrived at court, he interfered with the course of justice. He has set a trend in the UK of a) virtually any numpty with a phone and a blazing rage about something now calling themselves a "Citizen Journalist" with no training, no qualifications, no accreditation and, crucially, no understanding of journalistic ethics and rules and b) "Citizen Journalists" believing their own nonsense so much that they think they deserve to be told whatever they want to know, again with no concept of the damage that might do to the investigative process or the subsequent legal process. The police will issue CCTV and/or details of the Epsom suspects when it is safe to do so for the purposes of their investigation. Going on social media to rally the troops, turning up at the police station in numbers, blocking and lobbing projectiles at the police will not make them change their Standard Operating Procedures just because self-declared "Citizen Journalists" who don't know their arses from a hole in the ground believe they have a "right to know". Finally, and most importantly: have any of you self-important self-entitled men thought for a minute about what your actions would do the victim of this terrible offence if, through your behaviour, the investigation is impeded or a trial collapses? Of course you haven't. Because your "right to know" and "right to publish" as a self-appointed "Citizen Journalist" - and above all, your determination to spread racial hatred - is all that drives you.

BREAKING: BBC has compiled evidence of more than 160 Palestinian children deliberately shot in the head by IDF soldiers and snipers in Gaza. They concluded the worst thing ever: "Israeli jews are hunting children for fun."