Ruskin

106 posts

Ruskin

Ruskin

@RealRuskin

Las Vegas, NV Se unió Mart 2020
406 Siguiendo335 Seguidores
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
@nothingeverhaps @hundvd7 @waitbutwhy Even if they don’t, that’s not your fault. You are not relinquishing any control of your life by picking red and moving on with your life. Why someone chooses to want to create this issue I know not, but it is entirely their choice, and the consequences are easy to understand.
English
0
0
1
5
Tim Urban
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy·
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
3.5K
830
5.2K
8.5M
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
@myhandle @MarkusQ Why do reds need to be happy for almost half their countrymen to die, or insist 100% red? Red pickers can just know that it’s dumb to create a situation where they can die for no reason, and feel sorry for anyone who does so and may reap the consequences
English
1
0
2
216
Jakeup
Jakeup@myhandle·
@MarkusQ no. blues just need 50.1% to choose blue, not everyone. everyone will not just, but 50.1% often will. reds are either happy for almost half their countrymen to die or are insisting on 100% red
Jakeup tweet media
English
16
3
260
4.6K
Jakeup
Jakeup@myhandle·
the joke on the reds is that in real life, blue-pressers who are willing to expensively signal compassion and loyalty end up living in high trust communities while vice-signaling red-pressers die alone and mad screaming "but if everyone just"
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English
233
112
2.3K
69.7K
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
@hundvd7 @waitbutwhy I can only assume the people who choose blue want to create a situation that can end their life.
English
0
0
0
38
Hundvd7
Hundvd7@hundvd7·
@RealRuskin @waitbutwhy By pressing the red button, you create the risk of up to 50% of the world dying. By pressing the blue button, everyone stays alive. Always. Even the fucks that were retarded enough to press red. It's not about you, it's about everyone.
English
3
0
1
98
Equation Persuasion
Equation Persuasion@PhDPersuasion·
@waitbutwhy If you press the red button and all the blue button pushers die you're gonna be in a world where everyone is known to be a bad person with blood on their hands.
English
70
0
64
8.3K
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
@dylan707077 @selfawareott3r @AzPetrich My point is gay men are not “forced to like pussy” or go to hell. The bible just tells you not to do homosexual acts, if you have homosexual desires but do not act upon them, the bible does not condemn that. It only teaches against doing the act.
English
1
0
0
86
dyson fan
dyson fan@dylan707077·
@RealRuskin @selfawareott3r @AzPetrich You’re still gay regardless. Just like straight man can commit lust without even sleeping with a woman, or committing murder just because you dislike someone.
English
1
0
1
144
dyson fan
dyson fan@dylan707077·
@selfawareott3r @AzPetrich It says it’s better to cut off your hand if your hands cause you to sin. So why isn’t that taken into consideration. But gay men, who do not like pussy are forced to like them suddenly will go to hell because they don’t wanna stick their meat inside a discharging blood hole?
English
4
0
60
1.6K
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
@DolioJ @poorlemming To understand my post as taking that position, I am concerned for your reading comprehension ability.
English
0
0
5
52
Tactical Wisdom
Tactical Wisdom@DolioJ·
Listen carefully.... If everyone will be able to afford private chefs and maids, WHO WILL BE THE PRIVATE CHEFS AND MAIDS? The false promise falls apart right there.
The Iced Coffee Hour@TheICHpodcast

Jason Oppenheim reveals EVERYONE will be able to afford private chefs, maids, the best healthcare in 10 years due to AI👀 “Everyone within 10 to 15 years will have a Michelin star chef, a maid, babysitter, a dentist, and the best physician in the world”

English
1.2K
240
2.7K
131.3K
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
I think you misunderstand my point. Her claim was because a government program such as child support doesn’t start until a child is born (not 100% correct) then babies aren’t babies until they are born. If government programs for a certain thing indicate when it “begins” then learning must not begin until that age, unless perhaps government programs don’t do either of these things a
English
0
0
0
10
Bear
Bear@Beargirl_1·
women don’t owe the world children especially in a world where children are not safe
English
134
5.8K
24.2K
207K
Ruskin retuiteado
Owen Shroyer
Owen Shroyer@OwenShroyer1776·
Trump is complaining he put people in the Supreme Court who misrepresented what they stood for. Now he knows how we feel about him.
Owen Shroyer tweet media
English
869
2.8K
15.7K
343K
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
@RichardHanania In a world where everyone is put out of a job by AI, don't you think this will make it multitudes easier to get those 750 million people electricity and further away from scarcity?
English
1
0
0
953
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
Heard Ezra Klein talking to Alex Bores about AI and whether it will put everyone out of a job and what we need to do about it. About 750 million people on earth don't have electricity. Can we at least get everyone electricity before we talk about the "end of work"? It seems like many intellectuals have completely lost sight of trying to help real life people who are a long way from any kind of "post-scarcity" existence. Just get everyone in Africa clean water and working light bulbs as a first step and then maybe we can worry about technology creating *too much* prosperity. We've lost the plot.
English
78
50
780
82.2K
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
I think you may just not be able to comprehend my basic ass posts. I say that this thing isn't racist... you cite something that was racist in the past... I say, yes, just because this one thing isn't racist doesn't mean to imply there both haven't been and aren't racist things today, just that it is dumb to call this thing anti-black. There are no goal posts involved. Hope that clears it up for you.
English
1
0
1
31
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
We’re just talking about a different society. It’s not going to come overnight. Why are they building AI now? Obviously money is a goal, but if suddenly AI is advanced enough to do everything for us, they aren’t just going to pull the plug or shut it down. Hard to imagine perhaps.
English
0
0
0
14
old man yells at TVitter
old man yells at TVitter@JAvermie·
@RealRuskin @Russellflagg19 @poorlemming @DolioJ Why would people who have the money to create factories and manufacture shit care about what you want and need? The base case is they don't do anything. You need to explain why would they build shit for you. You "wanting" is not a reason for them.
English
2
0
0
38
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
@Ian_Fisch @ClimateWarrior7 Yes, because as stated, small cuts result in serious infection multitudes less often than they did in the past.
English
0
0
0
25
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
@sennekuyl @prinkasusa Equally, We must therefore, due to a similar, albeit smaller, percentage of woman who abuse men physically, treat all woman as unsafe until we hunt down and restrain the abusers. Or we could approach life with a more rational yet not 100% “safe” approach.
English
2
0
2
201
Sennekuyl 🇺🇦🦁☀️ 🇮🇷
Sennekuyl 🇺🇦🦁☀️ 🇮🇷@sennekuyl·
@RealRuskin @prinkasusa Which men? Women don’t know which of us are safe for them. Included me. Until we all hunt down that “small percentage” & restrain the abusers, women need to treat us all as unsafe. It is a really simple concept.
English
2
1
13
283
ً
ً@prinkasusa·
“men are providers” NOT ALL MEN. “men are strong” NOT ALL MEN. “men are powerful” NOT ALL MEN. “men are leaders” NOT ALL MEN. “men are protectors” NOT ALL MEN. SEE HOW RIDICULOUS IT SOUNDS WHEN YOU GENERALIZE EVERYTHING.
English
751
1.5K
10.6K
159.5K
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
Because people still need and want stuff? If somehow AI humanoids replaced all work, physical or otherwise, money would be much less relevant or useless , that doesn’t mean humans wouldn’t need and want things. You ask why would they, but why wouldn’t they? It’s hard to imagine because this world is so fundamentally different than modernity, but it wouldn’t make sense to not produce thing people need or want simply because you can’t “make money” doing it, in a society where money is useless
English
1
0
0
14
Ruskin
Ruskin@RealRuskin·
@sobateguey @izamamaa Just because “everything” isn’t to induce black failure doesn’t mean that nothing ever has and currently isn’t. These are two different things. It’s just that this is a good example of something that certainly isn’t setup to destroy black people but is being portrayed as such.
English
1
0
5
99

Descubrir

@nothingeverhaps @hundvd7 @waitbutwhy @myhandle @MarkusQ @diegocaleiro @MateoDeLaMoska @PhDPersuasion