Techdir

1.8K posts

Techdir banner
Techdir

Techdir

@Techdir8

AI Creator Experienced marketing specialist in Web3 Full content creation for media projects "AltEnter-media" agency founder.

bc1qhvv8p8fvvy820rj55e6390a28q Se unió Eylül 2020
597 Siguiendo452 Seguidores
Tweet fijado
Techdir
Techdir@Techdir8·
Techdir tweet media
ZXX
4
0
5
599
Techdir
Techdir@Techdir8·
@EduardoS79 @vxylily He is not a child, that is why he need to listen himself, listen to hormonally unstable human is not the answer.
English
0
0
0
3
Eduardo
Eduardo@EduardoS79·
@vxylily Wife. He isn't a child anymore.
English
1
0
5
59
lily
lily@vxylily·
MEN be real
lily tweet media
English
333
8
112
12.1K
Techdir
Techdir@Techdir8·
@vxylily He need to listen his own heart, mind and experience. And pretend he is listening his wife. Mother? Ok he can listen to her, but he always will take responsibility to his own decisions.
English
0
0
0
2
Techdir
Techdir@Techdir8·
@Shreya_bhyl Tell you more, real grown up men love without make up girls.
English
0
0
1
5
Elma
Elma@oelma__·
🤔
Elma tweet media
QME
1.4K
40
943
34.6K
PeckShieldAlert
PeckShieldAlert@PeckShieldAlert·
#PeckShieldAlert The IoTeX[.]io Bridge @iotex_io has been hacked for over $8M worth of crypto due to a compromised private key. The hacker has swapped the stolen funds to $ETH and has started bridging them to #BTC via #Thorchain.
PeckShieldAlert tweet mediaPeckShieldAlert tweet media
English
20
33
160
40.7K
aka
aka@akafaceUS·
A 23-year-old woman pretended to be a 14-year-old homeschooling student on Snapchat to have s*xu*l encounters with multiple boys aged 12 to 15, reportedly abusing one victim over 30 times. She has been arrested again after four additional children came forward with allegations.
English
1.6K
1.5K
13.2K
6M
lily
lily@vxylily·
Who??
lily tweet media
1.4K
63
839
53.4K
The Dor Brothers
The Dor Brothers@thedorbrothers·
We just made a $200,000,000 AI movie in just one day. Yes, this is 100% AI.
English
8.5K
9K
60.4K
20.1M
Vini B |「 thecoding 」
Vini B |「 thecoding 」@vinibarbosabr·
Interesting case here around NEAR Intents WARNING: this will probably be a very controversial post A red market operator lost 10 BTC while using NEAR Intents → /sexinfochina reported the loss with screenshots → NEAR Intents support bot claimed "mandatory compliance review" → @zachxbt showed proof that the OP advertised human trafficking and other red-market services on the 'FreeCity' Telegram, justifying the seizure On one hand, I'm happy a red market operator got screwed On the other hand, I'm concerned that NEAR Intents is seizing people's funds under compliance justifications without clearly/openly documenting/communicating the risk to its users If market makers (solvers) don't want to solve intents of certain users/addresses, fine, it's their right to do so and they can just NOT provide a quote for certain intents -- I have absolutely zero problems with that (I probably wouldn't have executed this guy's transaction either) Solvers are entities operating in a free market → they can just choose not to do business with some people 🤷 But locking and seizing the funds is something else (if this is really what happened here) It opens many vulnerabilities to the protocol that governments and other control-freak entities can exploit... This is not good... This is not what a DEX looks like Today it's seizing funds from red market operators, but who draws the line? We all agree that red market users are bad The problem my post is addressing is not about who is being affected right now, but that the protocol can do that -- and that this can, in the future, be abused to comply with unethical regulations affecting grey (or black) market users, for example If anything, this risk should've been clearly communicated and documented with a warning that the MPC network can freeze and seize funds that do not match a compliance standard required to use it, and what this compliance standard is → this is a bare minimum and should be addressed immediately, imo cc @AlexAuroraDev @chronear @ilblackdragon I would be ok with that, although it inevitably exposes the protocol's centralization and I'll likely stop promoting NEAR Intents as a decentralized venue from now on, as this, by definition, makes the protocol a CEX (a very good and well-distributed CEX, imo, probably the best out there, but still) Would love to hear people's thoughts on that as I know many will disagree with me (I know it's a highly controversial topic) Did I miss anything? What do you think? cc @TheDesertLynx @d3h3d_
Vini B |「 thecoding 」 tweet media
English
39
17
136
27.7K
Techdir
Techdir@Techdir8·
@dogeofficialceo this is not AI iguess it's blender or some other slop animated old fashion way
English
0
0
0
397
Techdir
Techdir@Techdir8·
@AVGirl4Life Those who are asking grok about what is the movie need to start learning cultural studies. Of course this is Lilu Dallas multipass lore.
English
0
0
0
8
American Values 🇺🇸
American Values 🇺🇸@AVGirl4Life·
If you know what movie this photo is from, I will follow you.
American Values 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
3.3K
136
3.9K
162.8K
Techdir
Techdir@Techdir8·
Hm..Ok! $RUNE
Techdir tweet media
English
0
0
3
805
Techdir retuiteado
Xeer
Xeer@Xeer·
Xeer tweet media
ZXX
715
1.3K
28.2K
510.7K
Techdir
Techdir@Techdir8·
@cometwtf In my country - yes 100%, but without a wife or a girlfriend
English
0
0
0
4
Comet
Comet@cometwtf·
Could you? Be honest...
Comet tweet media
English
893
27
887
89K
Elma
Elma@oelma__·
$2M or Facebook?
Elma tweet media
English
13.9K
648
10.9K
731K