Long_Rob 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴‍☠️☘️🇺🇸

@RealAlexJones @CountDankulaTV Great show guys. Keep up the good work. 👍

TUNE IN: Popular Comedian & Podcaster Count Dankula Joins Me To Cover The DOJ's Historic Indictment Of The SPLC, Iran War, Surge In Dead Scientists & MORE! Share This LIVE Feed! x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@bbcdebatenight I spoke to an elderly couple from Aberdeen the other day and they said the decline there is distressing. Civilisation doesn’t exist without oil and gas.

“This oil and gas industry is being destroyed by deliberate policy, nothing more” Reform UK Scotland’s Duncan Massey says a ‘just transition’ from oil and gas “doesn’t exist” and is a “gaslighting” tactic, which is “driving deindustrialisation” #bbcdn

Why Are The Globalists Obsessed With The Scots, & Why Do They Fear Them? 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE ALEX JONES SHOW NOW: x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@Frugal_Saver I will take my chances. I couldn’t leave Scotland.

@ayeplus88 If I were in the UK, I'd simply leave. I don't see any long term stability. It's way too late to fix all the things that are wrong (you must dig your well before you're thirsty & before the global supply chains have been fractured). And I say that as a lifelong anglophile.

One of my kids will be allowed to buy cigarettes. One will not. Am going to very much enjoy watching this being enforced over the next few decades. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

@Frugal_Saver So what should someone in the UK do, John? I’m following David and taking his advice .

@John_Stepek @MerrynSW So far, we've avoided a societal-scale negative feedback loop in psychology in which the public discounts the future to ever larger degrees. At some point, a collective discounting will accelerate & a long term mindset (encapsulated in equity values) will collapse to the present.

How our children, the next generation have been assaulted inside and outside school and what we need to do to save them, beautifully articulated.

@TFL1728 Sorcha speaks for us ordinary people.

The Man Nobody Is Talking About. His Name Is Sir Philip Barton. Buried inside Tuesday's committee testimony, beneath the headlines about constant pressure, bullying and secret job searches, is the detail that may prove the most consequential of this entire affair. It concerns not Olly Robbins, not Morgan McSweeney, not even Keir Starmer. It concerns the man who was there before all of them. The man who said no. The man who then left his post eight months early. Sir Philip Barton was the Permanent Under-Secretary at the Foreign Office when Peter Mandelson's appointment was announced in December 2024. He was, in other words, the most senior civil servant in the building at the precise moment the machinery of state was being directed to place a man with documented links to Russia and China into the most sensitive diplomatic posting in the Western alliance. What Robbins told the committee on Tuesday is this. Barton pushed back. When the Cabinet Office argued that vetting Mandelson was unnecessary, that a peer and Privy Councillor did not require developed vetting, Barton refused to accept it. He insisted that vetting was a requirement. He had to be, in Robbins's own words, very firm in person. He also voiced reservations about the appointment to Jonathan Powell, the National Security Adviser, reservations that were noted and not acted upon. He was worried, Robbins suggested, about exactly the same reputational risks that had been detailed to the Prime Minister before the appointment was announced. Then Sir Philip Barton left his post. Eight months before his tenure would otherwise have concluded. The question Richard Foord put to Robbins on Tuesday was the right one. Why did Barton's tenure end early? Robbins said he did not know. He suggested ministers may have felt it was time for a change. That answer is not an answer. It is the absence of one. Consider what the timeline now shows. A senior civil servant pushes back against the appointment, insists on vetting when the Cabinet Office wants to bypass it, raises reservations with the National Security Adviser, and departs eight months ahead of schedule. His replacement arrives to find the appointment already treated as a fait accompli, the vetting process under constant pressure from Downing Street, and the question of outcome entirely subordinate to the question of speed. If Barton was removed because he stood in the way of this appointment, then Robbins was not the first civil servant sacrificed to protect it. He was the second. And the question of who else was moved aside, overruled or silenced in the months between December 2024 and the moment the security services finally said no, becomes the most important question this affair has yet produced. Starmer sacked Robbins for following the rules. The Foreign Affairs Committee will now call Barton to give evidence. What he says will either confirm what the timeline already suggests or provide an alternative explanation that the evidence does not currently support. There is a pattern here that goes beyond process failure. Process failures are random. They point in different directions. What this affair has produced is a series of events that point consistently in one direction. Officials who comply are retained. Officials who push back depart. The security services are bypassed. The vetting is treated as an administrative inconvenience. And the one question nobody at the top of this government will answer is why this appointment, this man, this post, mattered so much that every obstacle was removed to make it happen. Barton apparently asked that question. He left eight months early. The country deserves to know why.

NI MP Sorcha Eastwood hits two tier Keir in Parliament: "What was it about the twice disgraced paedophile adjacent self styled prince of darkness that you found so attractive to put into this job?"

@SnoopDegB Never trust anyone from Bearsden.

Ross Greer gets you to pay his telly license for him.

@dorfman_p Why is populism frowned upon in certain instances and cheered on in others? If an idea or policy is good enough then an uninformed public should be ignored. Basically- get building nuclear power plants. And natural gas.

Poll finds "miserable" level of support for nuclear power in Scotland while more than half believe the main focus should be on renewables. thenational.scot/news/26035122.…

This is Sean Egan. He joined Morrisons at the age of 17. After 29 years of dedication at supermarket chain, he was dismissed for confronting a shoplifter, which led to a scuffle with thief who spat at him. A shameful decision by @Morrisons. He should be thanked, not sacked.

Let this sink in - it’s so unfair to us hardworking tax payers. 👇

@stevom72 @TakodaCrocuta @STVNews Took you long enough to think that one up. 😂

@ayeplus88 @TakodaCrocuta @STVNews What did it feel like for you?

John Swinney has “politely” turned down an invitation from Donald Trump to attend a state banquet at the White House next week, the Scottish Government has confirmed. news.stv.tv/politics/swinn…

@vkgscotland1 John would rather spend time with his trans friends.

Well done John Swinney. The only politician in this excuse of a "union" with not only principles, but a backbone.

@RebelHQ I'm Scottish but I support the good people of England. I hope the flag waving winds up all the right people.👍

Thursday, April 23rd, St George's Day -wave it with pride

@KenHunt1960 @thecoastguy Ok, time for your bed.

@ayeplus88 @thecoastguy You are easy to fool. Trump was not hit in the ear by a bullet.

I think the "assassination attempt" on Donald Trump in Butler was a stunt.

@OlafSNP Hey, Mcstando, have you seen the state of Aberdeen recently ? I was talking to an older couple from Aberdeen the other day and they were despairing at its decline. People like you are a danger to Scotland, so shut up.

The absolute state of Nigel Farage… He comes to Aberdeen for what Reform call a ‘local election’ rally (it’s the Scottish Parliament, Nigel) and seems to suggest he’s opposed to devolution? He has no clue about Scotland and does not care about Scotland.

EU enters full Owellian mode, where words start to mean the opposite of what they once did.. …placing the word “DEMOCRACY” on the side of the EU HQ in Brussels—an institution now with arguably more power than any other in Europe, and one where not a single person is elected.