Bitchy_Bitchy Spider

10.2K posts

Bitchy_Bitchy Spider banner
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider

Bitchy_Bitchy Spider

@bitcheespider

Se unió Ocak 2012
761 Siguiendo356 Seguidores
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider@bitcheespider·
@AmbassadorAlcee @misfitpatriot_ He has actually used his business ties to build stronger diplomatic relations with countries like the UAE and Saudi Arabia. They can't decide whether to be more pissed when he is allying with ME countries or when he is bombing them.
English
0
0
0
5
Mr. Alex_Fogg
Mr. Alex_Fogg@AmbassadorAlcee·
Who gives a shit? Some article from 2022? A lot of celebrities and politicians do business in Saudi Arabia it’s called business it has nothing to do with bought influence…. Show me where it’s bought influence? Show me what influence they have bought. And then explain how it’s different from anybody else. Again this proves nothing. It’s an article grasping at straws.
English
1
0
3
132
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider@bitcheespider·
@exJerryjones @AmbassadorAlcee @misfitpatriot_ Trump has been doing business with the Saudis since 1987. You all should be less concerned with the businessman leveraging his name to strengthen diplomatic ties and more with the lifelong politicians leveraging their positions/diplomacy to build their wealth.
English
1
0
1
5
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider@bitcheespider·
@exJerryjones @misfitpatriot_ Typical Libtard response. Blame others of being ignorant becauee you're too stupid to form an actual reasoning to the assertions you make. "I am not engaging in your attempt to make me defend my own bad faith argument 🤤"
English
0
0
0
4
The Misfit Patriot
The Misfit Patriot@misfitpatriot_·
Why the fuck does Jeff Bezos have to give you 7 billion dollars? The American people give the government around 7 TRILLION dollars every year and you fuckin retards haven’t fixed shit with it. You think if the creepy bald Amazon dude adds another 0.1% to that figure you’re finally gonna figure out how to stop blowing our fuckin money? Better idea, how about you give the other 99.9% to the private sector and see if they can figure out how to cure diabetes or make a sandwich for 4th graders. I bet they’ll have change left over.
Elizabeth Warren@SenWarren

Jeff Bezos has $222 billion. If he paid my wealth tax this year, we could fund insulin in America for everyone who needs it plus free school lunch for every kid in Texas—and have plenty of money left over. And Bezos would still have $215 billion dollars to spare.

English
682
4.9K
44.9K
1.4M
Nursekate
Nursekate@Nursekatejohn·
Telling my husband we are having our 5th baby. His reaction is priceless 🤍
English
747
918
11.6K
491.4K
🌧️
🌧️@sweetheart0799·
@banditcal2015 @MarioNawfal @AreOhEssEyeEe You could always unfollow him. Some of us actually give a shit about children being trafficked and murdered by the corrupt politicians and elite class. Also Epstein’s hand in every powerful government around the world essentially and the fact that he was Mossad.
English
2
0
0
29
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
Epstein’s network summed up in one image. Based on information released by the DOJ, this visual lays out just how extensive and interconnected his associations were. 🔴 key figure 🔵 associate 🟡 victim 🟣 legal 🟠 political Teal: witness Source: @AreOhEssEyeEe
Mario Nawfal tweet mediaMario Nawfal tweet media
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

A 2010 email shows Eva Dubin forwarding Epstein an invitation to a private Actors Studio event for Glen Dubin, featuring names like Al Pacino, Harvey Keitel, Ellen Burstyn, and Bradley Cooper. She asks Epstein, “Are you going to this? I was thinking I would go.” Hollywood everywhere... File Number: EFTA00753352

English
30
54
192
64.4K
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider@bitcheespider·
@sweetheart0799 @banditcal2015 @MarioNawfal @AreOhEssEyeEe Stop with the theatrics. You care about making sure people know you care about trafficked children. It is a virtue signal. If you actually cared you would be more discerning in the accusations you throw around because you are only serving to dilute the issue and cause fatigue.
English
0
0
1
5
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider@bitcheespider·
@shipwreckedcrew @ShawnRyanShow The pedo/pedo protector moniker is fast bemoning the new nazi. Thrown at anyone who disagrees with or points out a flaw in anything. It dilutes the meaning to the benefit of actual predators.
English
0
0
0
27
Shipwreckedcrew
Shipwreckedcrew@shipwreckedcrew·
Come on @ShawnRyanShow -- list 10 names here and call them pedophiles. You are so convinced DOJ is "protecting" them -- put your own skin in the game calling them out by name in this public forum. Massie and Khanna claimed they had the names and they were going to read them in public if DOJ didn't release the files. Then the best they could do was take names in a DOJ release and read them for the public, claiming they were part of some Epstein criminal operation. But we know that wasn't true. If there was a list and Massie/Khanna had the names, why did they need to pull the names from a DOJ release who had nothing to do with anything and claim that they did? THERE IS NO LIST!!! THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A LIST. If you are so confident the opposite is true, put up or shut up -- name some of them.
Home of the Brave@OfTheBraveUSA

Shawn Ryan on Pam Bondi: "You're gonna protect pedophiles. You're gonna protect pedophiles rather than go after them and hope everybody's happy that the Dow hit 50,000. Are you fucking out of your mind?"

English
272
577
2.7K
101.6K
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider@bitcheespider·
@quantum64653366 @nicksortor @TheMaineWonk It was a customer developed property and was sold at fair market value. They developed a similar sized custom property for Ecolabs in GA for around the same price. The only difference is DHS outright bought the property so that there is not ongoing partnership/relatuonship.
English
0
0
0
22
quantum 🇺🇸
quantum 🇺🇸@quantum64653366·
@nicksortor @TheMaineWonk wow you're so smart! now explain how $99 million worth of value was added for a special use property that no one else but the government needs or wants. oh, you can't.
English
3
0
15
465
Maine
Maine@TheMaineWonk·
‼️‼️ Trump Admin paid $128.5 million for this warehouse that sold less than 2 years ago for $29 million to use as an ICE internment camp. Who is the owner of the warehouse? PNK S1 LLC— subsidiary of RUSSIA BASED PNK Group. Of course.
Maine tweet media
English
737
7.5K
15.2K
1M
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider@bitcheespider·
@G_W_33 @nicksortor @TheMaineWonk It is an international development company not "Russia" you dingbat. Whatever you think of it, we allow international companies to do business in our country, so it is what it is.
English
1
0
0
33
GW33
GW33@G_W_33·
@nicksortor @TheMaineWonk MAGA: “China cannot own our farmland” ALSO MAGA: We paid Russia $128m for land in Georgia and I’m totally fine with them owning the land and then buying it and funding Russias war while I bitch we give money to Ukraine for the same war
English
1
0
11
169
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider
Bitchy_Bitchy Spider@bitcheespider·
@jillianvanessa7 @sourpatchlyds You think taking little girls into men's spaces is more appropriate than a father assisting his daughter in women's spaces? That kind of seems like it goes against the reason we don't want men in women's spaces 🤔
English
1
0
0
29
bedazzled garbage
bedazzled garbage@jillianvanessa7·
@sourpatchlyds It may not be ideal, but I still think the men’s room is the correct answer here. Or find a woman to help your daughter. But we can’t keep letting men into women’s spaces.
English
1
0
1
186
Sour Patch Mom ن
Sour Patch Mom ن@sourpatchlyds·
What should Dad do with a toddler daughter who needs to use the bathroom when they're out without Mom?
English
91
4
48
13.3K
J Peasemold Gruntfuttock
J Peasemold Gruntfuttock@Bludgeonox·
@sourpatchlyds As a young dad to a 3 year old I had this problem - didn't know the correct thing. Took her to the ladies but called out first to make sure it was empty. My thinking was my daughter might get exposed to something in the men's. A lady came in as we were washing her hands. Sucked
English
1
0
0
98
Matthew D
Matthew D@matthewpday·
@sourpatchlyds 3 daughters- I would ask someone to check the ladies room, and take her into a stall. No one else would be in there. The men’s room doesn’t have stalls for everything
English
3
0
1
504
The Dread duck Pirate Mark Brooks 𓅊
@imelizabethlane She's on the same level of Bondi and Leavitt. Completely void of morals or character. They'll all do and say whatever it takes to get what they want. Their souls are fully corrupt.
English
14
10
452
25.7K
ELIZABETH LANE
ELIZABETH LANE@imelizabethlane·
I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is. I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath. What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain: That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her. Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.) Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance. Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity. Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure. Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power. What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker. Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride. What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time. In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks! It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely! Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing. Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came. What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion. This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.
ELIZABETH LANE tweet media
English
7.6K
9.7K
58.7K
10.1M