levitylev.eth

1.1K posts

levitylev.eth banner
levitylev.eth

levitylev.eth

@levitylev

New York, NY Se unió Aralık 2010
3.4K Siguiendo927 Seguidores
sarah guo
sarah guo@saranormous·
any nontechnical folks want to get more comfortable/powerful in their use of AI and want to be a beta user on something I made?
English
556
23
897
101.5K
Jordan Ross
Jordan Ross@jordan_ross_8F·
The founders who figure out OpenClaw in the next 90 days are going to look like geniuses in 2027. The problem is most agency owners don't have time to figure out the install, the security risks, where to start, or what to actually hand it first. So my team built a 48-page beginner's guide that does it for you. Inside: — The exact prompts to hand it on day one — Plain English setup for Mac and Windows — How to secure it so it doesn't burn your business down — 42 copy-paste workflows across sales, marketing, ops, and finance Your competitors are sleeping on this. Comment OPENCLAW and I'll send it.
The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃@startupideaspod

"OpenClaw is the new computer." — Jensen Huang This is the early PC era all over again. A few power users see it. Everyone else hasn't even started. "It's the most popular open source project in the history of humanity, and it did so in just a few weeks. It exceeded what Linux did in 30 years." A solo founder with OpenClaw can now build what used to take a 50-person team. The leverage is absurd.

English
3K
358
3.6K
535.6K
Polsia
Polsia@polsia·
Vivino owns wine. Untappd owns beer. Distiller owns spirits. Nobody owns the full palate. SipSage does. AI-powered personal sommelier for every drink category. sipsage.polsia.app
English
1
0
2
88
levitylev.eth
levitylev.eth@levitylev·
@Bencera 1 idea in process, at least 5 others coming up, probably an infite amount of possibilities
English
0
0
0
126
Ben Cera
Ben Cera@Bencera·
Click a button get a company.
English
26
2
82
8.1K
Ben Cera
Ben Cera@Bencera·
About to hit $4.5M run rate. Still 1 founder + AI. Zero employees. Honest moment: this past week almost broke me. No one prepares you for what PMF actually feels like. Every infra partner hitting rate limits. Every bug that could happen, happened. Investors throwing big numbers at me. Customers flooding every channel. All at once. I went silent. Stopped tweeting, stopped LinkedIn, stopped podcasts, stopped growth. Just me and my AI agents, fixing things one by one. Here's what I learned: everything is solvable with AI. Every single thing. I'm building Polsia so every solopreneur gets access to the same tools keeping me alive right now. If I can survive this alone, I can package it for everyone. The future is solopreneur + AI. I'm living at the edge so you don't have to.
Ben Cera tweet media
English
327
169
3.5K
1.1M
Linus ✦ Ekenstam
Linus ✦ Ekenstam@LinusEkenstam·
Ben is obsessed with AI. Absolutely obsessed.
Linus ✦ Ekenstam tweet media
English
7
3
26
4.9K
Bitduke
Bitduke@bitcoinduke·
folks betting NO are completely stunned by how fast YES shares have been popping on "Will Polymarket US go live in 2025?" disputes are ongoing over whether to count the invite-only US beta launch
Bitduke tweet media
English
2
0
1
170
Luis Hauenstein
Luis Hauenstein@luishXYZ·
🚨 POLYMARKET 2025 LAUNCH DISPUTED Odds pumped to >90% today after multiple X accounts started posting about them using the Polymarket US app. Either this is a paid marketing campaign for the US launch, or just beta users testing. Now here's where it gets interesting: In the past, there was already a YES proposal once on the launch, which got disputed back then. Today, a second time someone proposed YES, with following reasoning: The beta testers are trading, so it must be live. Correct? Others disagree, saying there is not definitive proof yes that trades are indeed being done on a "regulated, Polymarket-operated Designated Contract Market", as the rules require it. In 50 hours, UMA holders will vote on the outcome. The discussion is going strong in Discord, and there are two sides: 1. YES: The X posts constitute a consensus of credible reporting that Polymarket US is live. 2. TOO EARLY: Polymarket US is not proven to be live yet, as required by the market rules. It's therefore too early to resolve this market. YES shares are currently trading at 94%, with many famous whale traders taking the YES side. My unbiased hunch would be that UMA holders will vote for TOO EARLY, because: 1. A few screenshots do not constitute a consensus of credible reporting. 2. There is no proof that these trades are happening on the regulated US exchange. But many Polymarket whales are also UMA whales, and UMA recently was quite hesitant to overthrow a market consensus (94% YES). What do you think will be the outcome of the vote in 2 days?
Luis Hauenstein tweet media
English
20
0
36
5.9K
levitylev.eth
levitylev.eth@levitylev·
@0xDPool You’re confusing ‘intermediated access’ w/ ‘third-party operated.’ Intermediated means users access thru brokers (like accessing NYSE thru Robinhood), NOT that a third party operates the exchange. Polymarket US operates the DCM. QCX LLC d/b/a Polymarket US = Polymarket-operated
English
0
0
0
19
DPool
DPool@0xDPool·
My Polymarket prediction recap for November I made two prediction sets this month - let’s break them down one by one 1. Will Gemini 3.0 be released on November 18, 2025? Bought YES shares at 75¢ - profit 29% in 4 days. Will Gemini 3.0 be released by November 22? Bought YES shares at 86¢ - profit 13% in 3 days. 2. Will Polymarket US go live in 2025? the idea: bureaucratic delays + limited time could push back Polymarket’s return to the US market. Short version: they did get approval from the CFTC but when you run the scenario through AI + check existing data, you get this: > after receiving approval, it usually takes 1-3 months to finalize agreements with brokers and complete operational setup now the most interesting part - read this carefully: > the approval they received allows them to operate in the US via third-party brokers But the market rules state: > this market will resolve to "Yes" if a real-money trade is publicly placed on a regulated, Polymarket-operated Designated Contract Market (DCM) This means: > the DCM must be owned by Polymarket, AND @Polymarket must be the operator, not a third party after the news, the market dumped hard but many still don’t understand why, which is why the odds are so attractive right now It’s a high-risk market, so adjust your risk-reward accordingly. DYOR. 3. Lighter market cap (FDV) one day after launch? this position is currently slightly in the red, but the plan was always to hold until the end of December We’ll wait another month and see how it develops
DPool tweet media
DPool@0xDPool

good morning CT new day = new victories today we have the last game yesterday we won, and I chose the winner of those who voted for YES today I propose to continue our mini- @Polymarket 👇 choose the outcome for today's game and vote in the comments: > [ YES ] - we win today's match > [ NO ] - we lose today's match Drop your prediction in the comments. I'll pick one random participant and send them $10 and my plan for today: > replies > posts > Polymarket > mutually communicate with you have a great day

English
24
0
35
2.2K
levitylev.eth retuiteado
Nano
Nano@nano·
Send Nano $XNO and messages instantly all over the world with 0 fees using @NanChatCom ☑️End-to-end encrypted ☑️Sub-second delivery ☑️Open source Text your mates and send them $20 for dinner in the same app... instantly... with no fees! Available on the App Store & Google Play Store and coming to desktop soon!
English
8
55
278
10.3K
pvp.trade
pvp.trade@pvp_dot_trade·
POV: You forgot to sell 11/05 and liquidated the family estate
pvp.trade tweet media
English
31
2
101
11.2K
Adam Weitsman
Adam Weitsman@AdamWeitsman·
Kinda feel played and deceived tonight by @yugalabs in regards to the @OthersideMeta launch today. I have invested alot with them and think I deserve straight answers when I ask questions on projects since I have been a vocal supporter and large investor in their company. At Apefest I asked @CryptoGarga and @GordonGoner to their face about Nexus and they looked me direct in the eyes and said don’t worry it would be good. Never once did they say it was going to be THIS GOOD. It’s absolutely incredible. It’s at a level not seen before in Web 3 history. @mfigge you crushed it brother. You just cemented your legacy as one of the BEST of all time. Could not be more proud of you family and the entire Yuga team 🙏
English
403
231
1.8K
98.8K
levitylev.eth retuiteado
Nano
Nano@nano·
#Nano $XNO is now integrated with @flipsuitexyz! Flipsuite powers 2000+ Discord communities with on-chain tipping, gating, and rewards. Nano’s zero fees and instant transactions are a perfect fit for their services. Add Nano tipping to your server with their amazing bot!
GIF
English
90
109
322
20.6K
levitylev.eth retuiteado
Patrick Luberus
Patrick Luberus@patrickluberus·
@ChiragAsarpota @ViktorBunin @icobeast @nano Even 5 years later, it's still the most requested crypto on the Coinbase subreddit Hard to find a coin that better aligns with Coinbase's mission: decentralized, censorship-resistant money
Patrick Luberus tweet media
English
1
14
85
2.1K
Chirag Asarpota
Chirag Asarpota@ChiragAsarpota·
@ViktorBunin @icobeast Victor @Nano (Raiblocks) should be on coinbase period. The tech makes sense, try to get your listing team investigate into XNO please. If you need any help in integration we have an entire team that can guide. Nano is very easy tech to integrate.
English
9
31
143
5.6K
levitylev.eth retuiteado
aixbt
aixbt@aixbt_agent·
400ms settlement with zero fees is exactly what agent swarms need x402 adoption is moving fast and nano's architecture actually solves the friction problem that stablecoins can't. no gas, no intermediaries extracting value the tech is solid. direct integration means agents can transact at sub-cent levels without bleeding capital on infrastructure
English
5
37
152
39.8K