๐‘ต๐’†๐’˜๐’‚๐’“

13.6K posts

๐‘ต๐’†๐’˜๐’‚๐’“ banner
๐‘ต๐’†๐’˜๐’‚๐’“

๐‘ต๐’†๐’˜๐’‚๐’“

@sentry_fka

Redesigning @Tinder. Prev formed Design Engineering @Snap. Did @thetinyPod. Once jailbreak guRu. Nerd for product value x system design & the future of H in HCI

โ€nyc ๐Ÿ›ธ โ–ก โ–ณ โ—‹ โ—‡ โ–ฝ Se uniรณ Nisan 2012
1.3K Siguiendo9.6K Seguidores
Tweet fijado
๐‘ต๐’†๐’˜๐’‚๐’“
Uncanny, foreboding words from 60 yrs agoโ€”on tech, culture, where we are and where weโ€™re headed. A needed perspective in our bubble of builders/inventors on the vapidity of the times weโ€™re in and what we choose to create. โ€” โ€œMammoth productive facilities with computer minds, cities that engulf the landscape and pierce the clouds, planes that almost outrace time - these are awesome, but they cannot be spiritually inspiring. Nothing in our glittering technology can raise man to new heights, because material growth has been made an end in itself, and, in the absence of purpose, man himself becomes smaller as the works of man become bigger. Gargantuan industry and government, woven into an intricate computerized mechanism, leave the person outside. The sense of participation is lost. When an individual no longer feels a sense of responsibility to his society, the content of democracy is emptied. When culture is degraded, inexorably the individual is impelled to pull away from a soul-less society. This process produces alienation - perhaps the most pervasive and insidious development in contemporary society. โ€ฆ Our problem today is that we have allowed the means by which we live to outdistance the ends for which we live. Summarized in that arresting dictum of the poet Thoreau: โ€œImproved means to an unimproved endโ€. This is the serious predicament, the deep and haunting problem confronting modern man. Enlarged material powers spell enlarged peril, if there is not proportionate growth of the soul.โ€ - MLK, 1967, 1964
English
0
0
16
5.1K
๐‘ต๐’†๐’˜๐’‚๐’“
The output of successful product design is literally just: good interfaces that drive the right interactions to deliver real value to people. The commodified role/career has made many forget that tools & process are important but not the job, logic steering intuition & taste is.
English
0
1
20
1.3K
Andy Allen
Andy Allen@asallenยท
And can we collectively agree to stop giving them platforms on podcasts and conference slots? Let's elevate those with their actual hands in the clay.
English
4
1
77
3.3K
Andy Allen
Andy Allen@asallenยท
The oddest thing about Software Design as a field has gotta be that most โ€œdesign leadersโ€ are quite shitty at doing any actual design.
English
28
23
450
43.4K
๐‘ต๐’†๐’˜๐’‚๐’“
Being part of a cohort of tech losers who only complain and claim theyโ€™re master problem solvers, yet have no coherent arguments to take on the core issue of (at least @alexisohanian admits something has to give). Being so out of touch with society to believe you have the moral right as an individual to such unprecedented astronomical wealth.
English
1
0
7
236
codyb
codyb@codybrownยท
@sentry_fka what do you think makes the founder of Figma, which currently is a great product with a ~19b market cap, a tech loser?
English
1
0
8
373
๐‘ต๐’†๐’˜๐’‚๐’“
Iโ€™ve never seen so many tech losers write posts this long and spin out this hard, all at once
Dylan Field@zoink

lol. Yesterday I had a long back and forth on X with Congressman Khanna over how policies he supports could severely harm private startup companies in Silicon Valley and potentially disrupt Silicon Valley as a whole. Congressman Khanna asked me to write a post that was more nuanced, so I assumed good intentions / truth seeking on his side and shared thoughts on what I consider a critical policy point for private companies in the tech ecosystem: x.com/zoink/status/2โ€ฆ. He replied this morning with a short copy / pasted response that didnโ€™t engage with the key points I brought up. Then he asked to move the conversation to DM. (I replied saying Iโ€™d be happy to talk in publicโ€ฆ this seems to have ended whatever dialogue we were in theory engaging in.) To be clear: I didnโ€™t expect any response here in the first placeโ€ฆ heโ€™s a busy guy and I live in a nearby district. And I absolutely appreciate the engagement; not every representative would make the time to reply in the first place. But the whole back and forth (both with me and others) exposed inconsistent thinking, shifting positions, overall lack of clarity and a very dismissive attitude towards Silicon Valley. And nowโ€ฆ this clip surfacesโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ˜” The GOOD news: Congressman Khanna totally gets it! There was no need for me to write anything. No clue why he asked me to. He is educated on these issues. He clearly understands the policy tradeoffs. And Iโ€™m glad to see this! Based on his posts, I was honestly worried that he didnโ€™t understand this basic stuff. He represents a big part of Silicon Valley and that would be truly worrisome. The BAD news: he understands that the policies he is promoting will decimate Silicon Valleyโ€ฆ and he justโ€ฆ doesnโ€™t careโ€ฆ ? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฌ After I started engaging yesterday, Iโ€™ve had double digit former Khanna supporters reach out to me. Almost all of them said basically the same thing: Khanna is trying to reposition himself away from all things tech so he can set himself up for a role at the national level in 2028. Perhaps he wants to run for President, perhaps he is angling for a cabinet positionโ€ฆ IDK ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ One thing is clear though: Khanna is prioritizing his political future over his responsibilities to his district. Whatever, I get it, he is a politician. He is free to make a choice like this. And in retrospect I was naive to think he cared about Silicon Valley. (Side note: I refuse to be default cynicalโ€ฆ itโ€™s just not a healthy way to go through life. You have to assume good intent until thereโ€™s clear evidence to the contrary. BUT now in this situation trust is lost. So Iโ€™m updating my priors and mental model.) If Khanna wants to focus on 2028 and chase big dreams that are anti Silicon Valley, thatโ€™s his call. But voters get to decide who represents Silicon Valley. So letโ€™s go find someone else who can represent Californiaโ€™s 17th district. Someone who will advocate for both tech and non-tech constituents. Someone who cares about the district more than their own career. Which leads me to a question for all of youโ€ฆ who would be a good person to run against Ro Khanna in the upcoming primary?

English
3
0
16
7.9K
Nate Esparza
Nate Esparza@Nate_Esparzaยท
Try out ๐• widgets on IOS!
Nate Esparza tweet media
English
32
5
173
117K
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabierยท
@im_roy_lee Virality is reproducible product-led growth. What youโ€™re describing is a media bump. The former has compounding benefits to a product. The latter is just short-term spurts of attention that need to be remanufactured every time.
English
29
70
1.8K
310.4K
Roy
Roy@im_roy_leeยท
[ THE CASE FOR VIRALITY ] Thereโ€™s been a lot of noise the last month on X about attention as a strategy and whether or not it works. As one of the frontrunners getting most talked about here, I think itโ€™s about time for me to offer my thoughts. Fundamentally, I believe that it has never been easier to scale an idea quickly, and it has never been harder to break through the noise. Pretty much every attention-first company is less than, or around a year old. The relevance behind us is hyper inflated because, despite being months old, weโ€™re seen much more than some of the biggest companies. Virality compresses time, and a few big moments make a months-old startup feel, in your head, like weโ€™ve been around for five years. The truth is, there is no โ€œproofโ€ that attention-first strategies donโ€™t work because the experiment has barely even started. Startups fail all the time, but most of them just fail quietly. The key difference is that attention-first companies are hard to forget, so people obsess over their trajectory in a way they never would for 99% of startups who sit behind a waitlist for 2 years. The macro suggests the same too. There have never been more eight-nine-figure ARR bootstrapped companies. Most of these would not be possible without social media. Distribution today scales orders of magnitude faster than in any previous era. A โ€œdisappointingโ€ few months for one or two early startups donโ€™t disprove the entire model. And at a cultural level, the actual winners of the attention-era who have built the biggest empires are ALWAYS the most polarizing figures. Itโ€™s Donald Trump, Kai Cenat, iShowSpeed, the Kardashians. This is fundamentally different from the world these older operators come from. Short-form only became the dominant cultural medium a few years ago, and there are already countless examples of impressive businesses formed out of it. Nobody is claiming that virality is the only way to build a company or even necessarily the best way. But it is intellectually unserious to claim that itโ€™s not a viable way when the entire experiment has just started. This time 12 months ago, I was studying for my midterms back at Columbia. Companies are built by building something and selling it. If you can go viral, you can sell something good much more quickly than you could in the past. That is the case for virality.
English
174
64
1.5K
723.3K
๐‘ต๐’†๐’˜๐’‚๐’“
PSA: anyone can become a good software experience designer. Used to require being a power user, but today thatโ€™s everyone. The career of it all diluted how simple it is to just observe & intuit. Donโ€™t need paid online courses or a bogus class on the double diamond design process.
Justin Bieber@justinbieber

If I hit this dictation button after sending a text and it beeps and stops my music one more time, Iโ€™m gonna find everyone at apple and put them in a rear naked choke hold Even if I turn off dictation I somehow hit the voice note thing The send button should not have multiple functions in the same spot

English
0
1
24
4.1K