CyberVan
7.1K posts

CyberVan
@starchy73
Amazing Render courtesy of the talented @andreashiakas




I find binary spacex takes unhelpful and uninteresting. if you're actually trying to understand where spacex value could ultimately land in the coming years, you should run simulations anchored on the physics constraints of their stated infrastructure plans. SpaceX engineers at the edge of physics, so forecasting those constraints are actually instructive. This isn't a fintech or consumer play where market dynamics swing wildly from week to week and are truly unpredictable. This is hard science and engineering, where truth (in the form of physics) and a little optimism (eg - we won't blow ourselves up in 5 years) can give you a decent view into the future. in this video, I gave a sneak peak at the assumptions page (500 bottoms up variables) of our model and then walked through our value cloud, explaining some of the most important variables. It should provide helpful color commentary beyond the article itself but ou can play with the value cloud yourself here. research.33fg.com/analysis/spaceโฆ It's worth noting, that despite these big numbers, we have made many conservative choices like minimal to no AI Enterprise market forecast (so far), no P2P logistics, no in-space manufacturing, terminal multiples anchored against peers, 10% WACC (even though Elon has proven lower cost of capital). As such we feel its reasonable to consider our overall numbers conservative, even if we have a lens of optimism. It's possible to get lower numbers of course, but in most cases these are done by handwaving future plans to zero or CAGR based cashflow forecasts based on comparables that don't actually exist. hope it's helpful.









Sounds like Elon's already scheming on his next master plan: Interstellar.



@KHdimples @wholemars @Tesla_AI This functionality will be there in about 3 months or so


In about 3 months or so, Tesla FSD is about to get a very useful next step. Talking to Grok like you would talk to the worldโs calmest Uber driver. โTurn right here.โ โDrop us off at the entrance.โ โPark farther away, weโll walk.โ That is the difference between a car following directions and a car actually being useful. FSD plus Grok is going to feel very different. @Tesla @Grok / Writer: Annette, Designer: Jannรฉ

With @NASAAdmin working together with @Elon, we might finally build Moon Base Alpha. I suspect that @kimbal will play a part too.

Worker B's $TSLA ๐ซ๐ช๐ Optimus ๐ฆพ





The only reason to expedite a merger between $SPCX and $TSLA is to take advantage of the wildly inflated SpaceX valuation. Most IPOโs go through this same price inflation. SpaceX has a tiny float and massive amount of shares locked up just waiting for liquidity








Tesla is engineering safety right into the Cybercab! A Tesla employee in a production Cybercab simulated a drop-off and pick-up near downtown Austin. He exited from the passenger door, re-entered from the passenger door, and slid over to the driverโs side. The Cybercabโs seats have no middle obstruction, which allows an easy slide across to either side. This makes it safer to exit while avoiding oncoming traffic. The Cybercab can also park very close to the curb and open its butterfly doors upward to avoid scrapping or hitting the curb. This could make it safer to get in and out in certain situations. ๐ท @AdanGuajardo






















