Ben

628 posts

Ben banner
Ben

Ben

@eventuallyright

Status: Monitoring my portfolio.

Dallas Inscrit le Ekim 2025
342 Abonnements92 Abonnés
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
@OldRowSwig I dont watch Nascar, but what happens in a situation like this? Was it really an accident lol?
English
0
0
0
10
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
@TrendSpider Going to see some crypto wins shortly.
English
0
0
0
93
TrendSpider
TrendSpider@TrendSpider·
Futures open red, oil back on the rise as uncertainty remains in the U.S. - Iran conflict
TrendSpider tweet media
English
2
2
23
2K
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
Ya I think now Bitcoin heads back to ATHs. Nice liquidity dip and pop just now. MACD crossing nicely on the charts, $ETH looks to follow as well. MTS.
Ben tweet media
English
0
0
1
41
Lloyd Blankfein
Lloyd Blankfein@lloydblankfein·
Was at the WH Correspondents dinner last night, a rare DC trip for me without a subpoena. On the positive side—was exciting, no one was killed, and ended early. I noted a new litmus for status among the gov’t elite—whether you were whisked away by secret service, or left to fend.
English
143
358
5.6K
667.7K
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
If you look at Ouster, Inc. $OUST on the S-curve of adoption with Fortune 500 companies, its at the "Early majority" stage imo. That's a great place to be right now.
Ben tweet media
English
0
0
0
14
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
@pmarca I guess
English
0
0
0
41
Cam Mackintosh
Cam Mackintosh@RelativInvestor·
Not priced in
Julien Chaumond@julien_c

This is where we are right now. And i’m not gonna lie it feels pretty magical 🧚‍♀️ Qwen3.6 27B running inside of Pi coding agent via Llama.cpp on the MacBook Pro For non-trivial tasks on the @huggingface codebases, this feels very, very close to hitting the latest Opus in Claude Code, or whatever shiny monopolistic closed source API of the day is. In full airplane mode. Most people haven’t realized this yet. If you have, it means you have a huge headstart to what I call the second revolution of AI. Powerful local models for efficiency, security, privacy, sovereignty 🔥

English
1
0
0
26
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
@saylor @Strategy why did they choose you as the person who gets to yolo without consequences?
English
0
0
0
173
Michael Saylor
Michael Saylor@saylor·
The ₿eat Goes On.
Michael Saylor tweet media
English
1K
1.7K
15.1K
701.8K
o.o
o.o@clifcode·
@pmarca silicon valley spent 10 years speaking in metaphors and now they can't understand each other without a decoder ring
English
2
0
11
450
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
Overheard in Silicon Valley: "Have you tried listening literally, instead of allegorically."
English
39
23
393
28.2K
Summer's Eye
Summer's Eye@HellsBitchen_·
Too many dogs in NYC it's getting so gross
English
1
0
6
179
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
@icanvardar what’s the criteria?
English
0
0
0
12
Can Vardar
Can Vardar@icanvardar·
openai is less evil than anthropic and it’s not even close
English
80
13
380
14.7K
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
@BitcoinMagazine @TheBitcoinConf Do Bitcoin outflows lead to Alt coin inflows? Transparently, I don't know shit about how the technology or finance system of crypto works. The reason I am asking is because it seems like the Alts look ready for a run.
English
1
0
3
64
Bitcoin Magazine
Bitcoin Magazine@BitcoinMagazine·
The world's largest Bitcoin conference starts tomorrow 👀 You are not prepared 🚀
Bitcoin Magazine tweet media
English
85
110
592
23.2K
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
@netcapgirl Not sure if id enjoy that environment
English
0
0
3
55
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
@gelQuentin70m67 I think we are at deployment phase, both $OUST and StereoLabs reported record deliveries last quarter.
English
0
0
0
38
Wengel Quentin
Wengel Quentin@gelQuentin70m67·
@eventuallyright If physical AI moves from narrative to deployment, names like this could re-rate quickly—but timing is everything. Serenity did mention it on his Telegram ALEABITOREDDITX—he pointed out that infrastructure layers tend to get repriced after utilization inflects, not before.
English
1
0
1
105
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
Disillusioned by the growth of AI. Starting to believe the only chance to escape the permanent underclass is in the next 5 years? By owning compute and control of the infrastructure that makes AI and Robotics work. Hard to see new generations having much opportunities, unless they’re highly specialized. Especially with physical AI and automation coming to replace everyone in the human workforce. All the value derived from AI will go to shareholders, without requiring the cost of labor.
English
129
57
1.1K
72.7K
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
Wow I need to pick my head up from $OUST
GIF
English
0
0
2
44
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
Some quick numbers on $OUST, profitability is only a matter of time. Late 2027 seems right for for adjusted EBITDA breakeven. The Operating Leverage Math: Ouster's total operating expenses through the first nine months of 2025 were ~$121M, with R&D at $50M, G&A at $50M, and S&M at $21M. That puts full-year 2025 opex around $160M. Management has committed to GAAP opex growth of only 5–8% from 2025 levels going forward — which is the single most important number in this whole story and the one people are glossing over. Here's the math that should get your attention: 2025 revenue: $169M, gross profit ~$83M (49% GAAP gross margin) 2025 opex: ~$160M → operating loss ~$77M If opex grows only 5–8% annually and revenue grows 30–50%, the gap closes fast Model it out simply at the midpoints: 2026: ~$220M revenue, ~$108M gross profit (49% margin), ~$168M opex → ~$60M operating loss 2027: ~$290M revenue, ~$130M gross profit, ~$178M opex → ~$48M operating loss on GAAP, but Adj. EBITDA breakeven is plausible because stock-based comp (~$25–30M) and D&A (~$15M) are addbacks 2028: ~$380M revenue, ~$160M gross profit, ~$187M opex → GAAP operating breakeven territory
English
0
0
1
41
Ben
Ben@eventuallyright·
@JosephJacks_ I have always thought that the government hides and delays the release of accelerated technology to protect the human race. And when the time is right, and they think we can handle it, they release it..
English
0
0
0
14
JJ
JJ@JosephJacks_·
70 years ago in 1955, John von Neumann wrote an epic and prescient essay: “Can We Survive Technology?” … He saw that technology’s spatial reach was catching up with Earth’s actual size, while political organization remained stuck at smaller scales, and that human reaction time is a fixed constant while the technological tempo only accelerates — so each new generation of tools enlarges the unit affected by any single decision until the unit becomes the planet itself! 🌎 From this logic, he drew the conclusion that no procedural firewall, no institutional design, no advance solution can absorb the resulting risk; only ongoing judgment exercised in real time by agents with skin in the game can. sseh.uchicago.edu/doc/von_Neuman…
JJ tweet media
English
1
3
11
602