Nigelchamp

@retrosaudade @wendelltalks Why do you assume all that exists must be perceivable through human senses or discovered through science? Honest question

@wendelltalks You can't say "science is clear on that" and then pivot to throwing the scientific process (which includes not knowing things sometimes and formulating hypothesis) under the bus, in favor of your imaginary friend in the sky. lol

Atheism’s first problem is the simplest. Why is there something rather than nothing? The universe had a beginning. Science is clear on that. Out of nothing, nothing comes. So what caused the cosmos and set its laws in motion? Atheism usually answers “We don’t know yet” or reaches for an unobservable multiverse. That’s not an explanation. It’s a hope that naturalism will someday save itself. Logic points to an uncaused Cause outside of space and time.

@JudyinCanada1 @ConceptualJames And don't forget he was almost stabbed to death in jail. Insane.

@ConceptualJames And Derek Chauvin is still serving time, with a long way to go.

The fact that our whole country went riot-bananas and literally called you a Nazi if you didn't go along with making a national hero out of a criminal who was dying of a fentanyl overdose after passing a bad bill to a Palestinian is really, really crazy when you look back at it.

@TrumpsWarCrimes @JonnyRoot_ It's time to move on. What's the point in constantly whining about the past? It's still taught in school, everyone knows it was wrong. We were all moving on and race relations were going great until Barry O came along and the new Marxism of wokeness took hold...

@JonnyRoot_ So you’re going to ignore the part where one of those groups were only allowed to attend schools with white kids less than a century ago? How they still face serious systemic racism and discrimination to this day? Or does your knowledge of history date back to this morning?

Imagine if the #1 women’s tennis player, Aryna Sabalenka, held a segregated dinner party for only white players with John McEnroe in attendance. She would be forced to apologize, Tennis Channel & ESPN would make statements/condemn it, & McEnroe would be suspended or fired. So why is a segregated blacks-only dinner party hosted by Naomi Osaka, with Chris Eubanks in attendance ok? You can’t have it both ways... PS: There has never been a whites-only party hosted by a white player in professional tennis as Osaka claims. She’ll never be able to provide proof.

@Jillrabbit325 @JonnyRoot_ Hate when black people are in your spaces?? What??

@JonnyRoot_ What makes this so hilarious is YT people are angry like they wanted to be there 🤣😂 you hate when black people are in your spaces but when they hold their own events you’re angry as well🤣😂 she did nothing wrong, you weren’t invited anyway so why are you so concerned? Lmao

@YeauxA @JonnyRoot_

@JonnyRoot_ Naomi is an insufferable mental case attention seeker 🤷‍♀️

@1Chillwind @JCBarraza2 @JonnyRoot_ Like what?

@JCBarraza2 @JonnyRoot_ You're either clueless or very young. The Williams sisters had to put up with tons of bullshit for years.

@Sancann42 @JCBarraza2 @JonnyRoot_ What racism?? Let's hear it. Whatever it was it wasn't enough to keep them from excelling and becoming legends of the sport. Having any color only party is divisive and only makes things worse. Dumb.

@JCBarraza2 @JonnyRoot_ Maybe you were able to look past the racism Serena and Venus experienced because you never thought of them as black.

@ConceptualJames This kind of post is why I still open X.

I don't know if you have noticed that Western Europe is falling, and the Commonwealth is about as Woke as it gets. Where does that leave the Western Alliance? How about the United States? What say ye, America Firsters? The long general (though not total) period of peace we have enjoyed since WWII is broadly known as the Pax Americana, and it is effectively a generally peaceful and secure world order mostly managed under an International Law Agreement known as the United States Navy, backed by the rest of the U.S. Armed Forces. That peace was facilitated not merely by American peace through strength but also through a network of Western allies throughout Western Europe and the British Commonwealth (including the UK, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia), plus some others, who provided intelligence sharing and strategic military staging for the United States military (seeing as they never really made real militaries of their own after WWII, for the most part). Now, in the 21st century, the Commonwealth and Europe have gone Woke, and they're heavily infiltrated with Islamism. They are on the precipice of disaster, and even if they weren't, they're not particularly engaged with American interests anymore. In fact, they're mostly hostile to them since Trump upset the whole little Great Reset, Agenda 2030 program in 2016. The competing doctrine to that "Postwar Consensus" world, in which Western Europe and the Commonwealth will mostly be slaves, is called the Multipolar World. The idea is simple. The world won't be unipolar (U.S. global hegemony, since 1991) or bipolar (U.S. vs. USSR, 1945-1991). There will be at least three poles, perhaps four (Russia, China, Islamic, Western/US). This is the Russian nutjob Aleksandr Dugin's fantasy, and the World Economic Forum had fully bought into the program too. It's meant, essentially, to let the People's Republic of China and the Islamic Frankenstein's monster rise, with Russia getting better scraps and big revenge on the West that broke the Soviet Union. It's the "New World Order" program we've all been running from. Of course, a single new hegemon will eventually arise from it, probably the PRC, but the WEF/UN had somewhat different ambitions by the same path, as does the Islamist project. What if you love America and the American way of life? What if you love life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? What if you love freedom? What if you want the free nations of the world to enjoy something like the Pax Americana? Well, you can't have that with the Multipolar World model. Western Europe will be slave to the Islamists. Eastern Europe will go to Russia. The Commonwealth, outside of Britain, will be split apart between Islamists and the Chinese. America will be isolated, divided internally, shrunken, and eventually defeated. RIP freedom. We can have it, though, with a new alliance structure, and if you don't understand this, you don't understand anything about what Trump is doing on the world stage. It isn't just about stopping China or BRICS or securing against terror or grabbing oil or controlling shipping lanes. A whole new world alliance structure (of good guys) is in the works, and the enemies of freedom and prosperity know it and are doing everything possible to stop it. The first link in this new chain of allies is the U.S.-Israel alliance, and virtually the whole plan depends on this alliance staying strong and accomplishing its initial goals. That's why it's under such heavy attack. It's literally the key to Western values being strong in the 21st and into the 22nd centuries. Nothing less than that. This alliance could be strengthened immeasurably by being joined by a freed and restored Iran. You must understand this. It isn't just that the IRGC is awful, evil, and on the other side of all of this. It's not just the oil, though that's really important too. It's also that Iran sits geographically at the crucial crossroads of the entire Eastern Hemisphere and the trade circumstances of almost six billion people. Strategically, at least in certain ways, this growing alliance would likely include India, were it to get off the ground, and Japan as a far-Eastern endcap. It could conceivably include South Korea, though that's dicier now than it was two years ago, and it would likely include Taiwan after a fashion. This alliance would effectively control the Western hemisphere, CENTCOM, and a significant strategic presence in the Pacific Theater. As a result of this alignment and its consequences, Australia and New Zealand might start rethinking some things in a big way, thus changing the course of some of the Commonwealth. It's definitely in their interests, and they're already starting to realize their current peril, though not strongly enough. Eastern Europe would want to join as protection against Russia. Western Europe remains a wildcard, but it also stands as largely irrelevant from a strategic perspective save the fact that the European nuclear powers (France and Britain) cannot become Islamist. Canada would resist all of this until it couldn't, which is stupid and oh-so-idiotically Canadian. Most of the Arabic Middle East wants to modernize. Many of them are sick of the backwards radicalism and want to participate in the 21st century, whatever other designs and ambitions they have for their own kingdoms. They might not join in as strong allies to this development, but they're likely to be solid partners in such a program, unless BRICS and the "New Silk Road" (Belt and Road Initiative) are better deals. Which side do you want them on with all that? This is what we're really talking about, guys. This is what's really going on. This is what President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu are actually brokering in the world. If you care about freedom, prosperity, and peace, you're backing this. If you aren't backing this, you're backing evil empires like the People's Republic of China, the Islamist Crescent, and the revenge fantasies of post-Soviet Russia. The first link in this chain for peace and prosperity over the next century is the U.S.-Israel alliance. That's the key to making the whole project work. That's why there's such a huge push to break that alliance now before this really gets solidified as the core of what what will replace the faltering Western Alliance in this twenty-first century. You have a choice. You can support and help reinforce this first link in the chain of freedom, peace, and prosperity for the next 100+ years, or you can be on the side that opposes these, not just in the moment but in the future, not just for some people out there somewhere who you don't care about, like in today's Iran or China, but for most of the people in the world for most of the next century. If you have turned against the U.S.-Israel alliance, or just Israel, or just Jews, as the result of Red-Green-Brown propaganda over the last few years, you are a useful idiot against this freedom, peace, and prosperous future, but you can stop that today. You can understand what's happening in the world beyond your group chats and get on the right side of one of the most important questions and hinges in world history.

@predictanalyst @Rickisback_ON_X @magicpanda_703 He led a protest to pressure congress to stall the vote so they could investigate vote fraud. That's what he's guilty of. Period end of story.

@Rickisback_ON_X @magicpanda_703 Listen faggot I had friends hurt in that riot . It was a trump event he campaigned on stop the steal for weeks . He led an insurrection

Never forget, the Supreme Court of Colorado decided 4-3 that president Trump should be removed from the Primary Ballot in CO because they claim he was an "Insurrectionist." Even though, he was never even charged with that crime or anything like it. This is the kind of nonsense we have been dealing with for nearly 10 years now.

@GeorgeLibe36238 @Rickisback_ON_X @magicpanda_703 Exactly what did you see that Trump did that makes him guilty of insurrection?

@Rickisback_ON_X @magicpanda_703 Just because he wasn’t convicted doesn’t mean he didn’t do it. He’s guilty. I saw it with my own two eyes…the incitement and the result of that incitement- cops being attacked, people desecrating the Capitol by defecating on the floor.

@Sseanc1976 @Nisikaa1 @DrFisura Sometimes you just hit a mental block wall with people. They repeat the same thing, thinking they won the argument when in fact their position makes no logical sense.

@Nisikaa1 @DrFisura @Skeletonkey5555 LISTEN. TO. WHAT. I’M. SAYING!! That is fine!! But you can’t call people good or bad!! Like you said, it’s all preference. Last time I reply as you’re either ignorant or obtuse!!

You don’t need religion to have morals. If you can’t determine right from wrong, then you lack empathy, not religion.

@Lady_Misift @Pat72852006 @AbbyJohnson And then she changed her mind. Hello??

@Pat72852006 @AbbyJohnson Abby did. Twice. Keep simping for her tho. It’s fucking pathetic.

The abortion debate is not complex. You either support baby-murder or you support a baby’s right to life.

@TradAdvocate @nosoup4knowles x.com/i/status/20487…

@nosoup4knowles "tried without evidence"? What does that even mean? She's not being put on trial. People are just commenting on her bizarre behavior.

If I'm wrong about Erika Kirk (I'm not), the worst I'll be guilty of is defending a woman from being tried without evidence. If you're wrong about Erika Kirk, you'll be guilty of making a widow's life a living hell after an unspeakably horrific tragedy.

@LivingGodsTruth @RepShriThanedar Amen!! The slavery comparison is so apt here! I predict a day when social conscious will turn on this subject and supporting it will be like supporting slavery today.

Abortion is not: Healthcare A Constitutional right Reproductive rights Women's rights It's murder. It's beyond evil to lessen the barbaric dismembering of a human being at it's earliest developmental stages of life. Trying to dehumanize a person with language like, "a half-ounce fetus", for a political agenda is not new. It's the same strategy slave holders used to defend the evil of chattel slavery and Nazis used to exterminate Jewish people.

My favorite kind of abortion is the kind that's safe, legal, accessible, and none of your damn business to regulate. And no amount of fearmongering by describing what goes on to a half-ounce fetus with no consciousness, self-awareness, or feeling of pain is going to change that.

@TrumpCokeHabit @BigWagWag @RepBrandonGill "It's of vital importance that everyone be able to have casual unprotected sex with no consequences, even if that means murdering a human in the womb!" Why are people like you so fired up to defend this barbaric evil act? It's mind boggling. You have no soul.

@BigWagWag @RepBrandonGill You misspelled embryo or fetus, retard

Today I asked an abortion advocate what her favorite method of abortion is.

@dmorelli9 @Pray2EndAbtn @kangminlee @RepBrandonGill Huh? That makes no sense.

@Pray2EndAbtn @kangminlee @RepBrandonGill Anything that results in the fetus leaving the womb early is medically an abortion. A miscarriage is a ‘spontaneous abortion’. Under your definition a miscarriage would be manslaughter

@aimieeee___ @the_primuspilus Why do you assume all that exists must be perceivable through human senses or discovered through science?

@the_primuspilus Me existing is enough proof. Unlike your non existent god.

I am an atheist and an anti-theist. I do not believe in any gods, and I see no convincing evidence that any exist. Even if a god did exist, I would not see it as necessary for meaning, morality, or human progress. My worldview is centered on humanity- our ability to create meaning, build ethical systems, and improve society without appealing to divine authority. I believe humans often underestimate their own capacity for empathy, reason, and collective growth. The existence of countless, conflicting deities across cultures reinforces my skepticism. It suggests that gods are human constructs shaped by time, geography, and social needs—not evidence of a single universal creator. I am critical of religion, particularly because of its historical and ongoing role in enforcing patriarchal systems and limiting women’s autonomy. While individuals may find comfort or identity in religion, I believe its institutional power has often come at the cost of equality, freedom, and critical thinking. My stance is not just disbelief—it is an active rejection of ideologies that place unquestionable authority above human well-being and progress.

@m_collapsar @Danny456080 Seek help.

Homosexuality was well known in the ancient world, well before Christ was born, and Jesus never said a word about homosexuality. In all of his teachings about multiple things he never said that gay people should be condemned.

@Danny456080 @macrofern Yep, you're right! God looks down on 2 men having sex and says "yes, this is what I had in mind." Idiotic. Some things are just not complicated.

@macrofern John 3:18 is a non-sequitur: You brought up John 3:18, but that addresses the general concept of belief, not the specific moral conversation we are discussing. Using a blanket statement about salvation to avoid addressing specific moral instructions is just a deflection.

@biblemythology Moron tweet of the day right here!

The Bible cannot be updated, so the errors it contains will always be there. Meanwhile, science, archaeology, and history have made huge advances, which has widened the gap between the Bible and reality. The Bible will not change, it will always be unreliable.