Luke Saffrett

695 posts

Luke Saffrett

Luke Saffrett

@LSaffrett

शामिल हुए Ekim 2022
130 फ़ॉलोइंग118 फ़ॉलोवर्स
Gus
Gus@na_me_eso_atta·
@ChrisEsplin He's been right about everything else so far (such as Elon still not selling unsupervised FSD in customer vehicles ten years after he promised it'd be available). Everything Elon promises evaporates.
English
1
0
5
165
Chris Esplin
Chris Esplin@ChrisEsplin·
I'm certain this guy will graciously accept defeat when he's proven wrong.
Chris Esplin tweet media
Draper, UT 🇺🇸 English
46
3
246
14.2K
frakmaga2025
frakmaga2025@FrakMAGA2022·
Congress creates the budget and authorizes the spending. The President has to sign the bill to approve it. The Executive branch is just as far in as Congress. Not to mention, before Congress even begins budget deliberations, the President must submit an annual budget request. So riddle me this. Trump wants to increse the Pentagon budget by 50%, boosting it another $500 billion. If Congress does that, do you still think the executive branch isn't responsible? Maybe take some time off the Internet and do better research before you make a fool out of yourself again.
English
1
0
0
5
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
“We should take people’s money to solve homelessness / end hunger / provide free health care” Alright. Why don’t you go do that? Pass the program, run up the deficit a little. You already spent $1.75 trillion more than you brought in last year. Feel free to spend a little more to solve all our problems. Then, after we see how great these programs are, we can figure out how to raise tax revenue to keep them alive. If they’re really that great and solve all our problems, then sure. Let’s tax the rich. That would be worth it. But the reality is you have no plan to solve any of these problems, even given endless money. Any additional tax revenue raised will go straight down the hole. You’ve already spent it. You’ve spent $1.75 trillion more than you brought in. And we’ve all seen how little it has done for us.
English
30
42
360
15.1K
James
James@SoNowUknow2·
You have £100 in you bank account. I have £50 in mine. Will you give me £25 so we each have the same amount of money? No? What about if you had £1000 and I had £500? Would you give me £250 of your money? Why then do you want Musk to give away his money but you keep yours?
English
39
31
428
7.8K
The Dad Presents
The Dad Presents@Dad_Presents·
This whole Elon “trillionaire” conversation is depressing because it reveals how economically illiterate we are. A $1 trillion net worth does not mean Elon walked into a village, stole everyone’s bread, and locked it in a vault. In fact, he probably consumes fewer real-world resources than the average Hollywood climate activist screaming about him from a private jet-adjacent lifestyle. Elon built things people voluntarily use, and invested in companies that created massive value to billions of people. The collective quality of life of society has been elevated by this man’s work. He didn’t get handed a trillion dollars and start hoarding all the food, houses, and medicine. Elon is a contributor. Not a taker. Probably the biggest one alive. Which is why he’s worth $1 trillion and the people who don’t understand that are still yelling “fair share” into their iPhones.
English
148
403
2.2K
45.9K
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@BenGunnEx @robertgraham No im say that they are still needed and will be used for years until they finally die and get deorbited. Not everything needs the latest chip
English
1
0
0
5
Ben Gunn
Ben Gunn@BenGunnEx·
@LSaffrett @robertgraham Sorry, are you going to claim that AI datacentres in orbit with old chips will perform as well as new chips in ground centres???
English
1
0
0
3
Robert Graham
Robert Graham@robertgraham·
It's you leftists who are to blame. Over a $1 trillion of SpaceX valuation comes from a future "orbital data-center" business. That business is only viable because of the political opposition to terrestrial data-centers. The more you oppose data-centers, the more you repeat misinformation about tax-breaks and water, the richer you make @ElonMusk (pbuh).
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

BREAKING: Elon Musk is now worth more than the next five richest billionaires in the world combined

English
32
7
65
13K
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@TCentrist39096 @SoNowUknow2 What wasted funds. Musk is literally the most productive person in history. The more capital he controls the better the world gets. If anything we should be all throwing money at him to build a better future
English
1
0
0
3
The Last Centrist
The Last Centrist@TCentrist39096·
@SoNowUknow2 Silly argument. Socialism is not about creating absolute parity. It's about establishing a point at which further hoarding of wealth is pointless - & putting to use those wasted funds. Great wealth alongside poverty = problem.
English
2
0
1
18
Lawrence Watts
Lawrence Watts@LawrenceWa2899·
@SoNowUknow2 Because the money in his bank account IS mine! His tax burden is negligible. Mine is 20% If HE paid his due, my net tax burden reduces. He doesn't. I have to make up the shortfall, that I should be able to keep. Therefore the money in his a account is what he defrauded from me.
English
2
0
1
18
naturegirl1999
naturegirl1999@DEWNature1999·
@itsrosesm It’s because he’s selfish, he has enough money to make so many lives better, he could end world hunger if he wanted to, fund scientific research, but instead he hoards the money to himself instead of helping society. I hate him for the same reason I hate other billionaires.
English
19
0
3
223
Rose Smith
Rose Smith@itsrosesm·
I don’t understand why people hate Elon Musk so much.
English
919
24
688
39.3K
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@addos @wholemars When you want to build shit on a scale the world has never seen before it takes a lot of capital
English
0
0
0
3
Bradley Frank
Bradley Frank@addos·
@wholemars for somebody who keeps making the claim that money will be useless, he sure seems to be hyper focused on making more and more of it.
English
2
0
0
97
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
they’re struggling to pay for groceries and gas because of your policies. haven’t you noticed that as soon as you cross any state border gas gets cheaper? Elon isn’t making gas expensive. He built a car that doesn’t need gas. And tbh the SpaceX IPO has done more to pay Americans bills than any of your policies Governor.
Gavin Newsom@GavinNewsom

Americans are struggling to pay for groceries and gas while Elon Musk becomes a TRILLIONAIRE. When the federal government is for sale, the rich get richer and everyone else gets shafted. The system is rigged.

English
26
58
627
26.3K
Isaac TRexArms
Isaac TRexArms@IsaacBotkin·
Elon Must has a trillion dollars, and that is deeply unfair. If we could just be allowed to take his money, ruin his factories, melt his rockets down for scrap, burn his cars for heat, and force his hundreds of thousands of employees out onto the streets, humanity could finally rise to new heights of utopic equality and the world would become a workers paradise. Sincerely, the Communists.
English
138
161
1.4K
56K
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@CovertQOS @IsaacBotkin The only idiots that are negatively effected by musk being a trillionaire are the ones that shorted his companies.
English
1
0
2
54
Covert QOS
Covert QOS@CovertQOS·
@IsaacBotkin The argument is not that billionaires are taking a life-changing amount of money from people. The argument is that billionaires use their wealth to corrupt governments and tilt markets in their favor, which negatively impacts the rest of us.
English
14
0
3
2.6K
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@BenGunnEx @robertgraham There no such thing as outdated. They just get used for less demanding tasks. The world needs every bit of compute it can get its hands on. When the power is free it doesn't matter if its a little less power efficient.
English
1
0
0
16
Ben Gunn
Ben Gunn@BenGunnEx·
@robertgraham You think orbital data centres are viable. Their CPUs are outdated in 3 yrs. Do tell us how any of this is viable.
English
3
0
7
307
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@DaveGilfeather @robertgraham Many scientists might need to find new careers if they think spacex is wrong. What would the company with the biggest data centres in the world and the 10,000 satellites know.
English
2
0
1
30
Dave Gilfeather
Dave Gilfeather@DaveGilfeather·
@robertgraham I don’t think that’s it, many scientists have already stated his plans won’t work. I honestly believe it’s people are just buying the hype and this is gonna be another rug pull by Elon and his buddies
English
2
0
4
239
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@TazSims11 @Dad_Presents How dumb do you need to be to think musk isn't brilliant. The guy the best engineers in the world call to help sove problems they can't fix is definitely an idiot. All those engineers are definitely wrong about his genius. Random guy on x is probably right
English
2
0
1
43
Taz Sims
Taz Sims@TazSims11·
@Dad_Presents He is not brilliant, he is a trust fund kid
English
3
0
0
133
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@JohnOfOrion @Naropa88 @DigitalSamIAm The tiny amount the government has spent on musks empire is the greatest investment the government has ever made. Its the best thing to happen to the country in a century. Hes bringing back mass manufacturing to the country on a scale that hasn't happened since WWII
English
0
0
0
6
JohnOr
JohnOr@JohnOfOrion·
@Naropa88 @DigitalSamIAm Many big companies but not all. This is the waste, fraud, and abuse the conservatives are always going on about.
English
1
0
0
36
Sam
Sam@DigitalSamIAm·
Can we debunk this nonsense? Elon Musk was awarded (note: not given) cost-per-result contracts to perform a service for the US government. The total of those for SpaceX specifically is ~$22B, which includes repaid loans, state tax incentives, etc. The deal was simple: put stuff into LEO at or below a set cost. If SpaceX does it below the set cost, SpaceX keeps the difference. If it doesn’t, the company is responsible for the overrun. End result? SpaceX & Elon lowered the cost of getting 1 kg into LEO by 95-97% vs what NASA was paying previously. And for the record, every other company around at the time was offered the same opportunity to bid on the contract - Musk/SpaceX just took it. The handout narrative implies the taxpayer is the patron and SpaceX the dependent. The cost data shows the opposite: before SpaceX, NASA paid Russia’s Soyuz $80-86M per seat; SpaceX delivered at ~$55 million. SpaceX saved the US taxpayer $300M-$465M each year on that alone (the US sends 12-15 astronauts to space each year) On the lunar lander, NASA estimated SpaceX’s fixed-price bid saved $20B-$30B vs the Boeing-preferred cost-plus approach. So: SpaceX saved the US taxpayer more than the total value of contracts it earned on a single project, PLUS provided the US government with the requested services (put stuff in LEO) at the best possible price.
Political Punk@actingliketommy

Elon Musk was given tens of billions in government contracts and tax breaks and was able to take a company that’s lost $41 billion and somehow become a “trillionaire.” You will pay social security your whole life and they’ll tell you it’s an “entitlement” when you try to collect

English
453
3.1K
12.6K
1.3M
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@JohnOfOrion @galos_gann @DigitalSamIAm How exactly has he not used it to advance green initiatives. Hes sold more evs then the entire industry combined, built solar and battery storage, is currently building the worlds largest solar manufacturing plant . Hes done more then everyone else on earth
English
1
0
1
8
JohnOr
JohnOr@JohnOfOrion·
@galos_gann @DigitalSamIAm He was supposed to use it to advance US green initiatives, not hoard it and make himself a trillionaire.
English
2
0
0
9
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@GOTVPAC Musk noney is going to all those things. Taking away capital from the most efficient man in history and giving to the government would be a waste. If anything musk should be exempt from paying tax because his companies use the capital to benefit humanity far more then the gov
English
0
0
1
35
GOTV PAC
GOTV PAC@GOTVPAC·
Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire can’t just be understood as money he has, but rather money that won’t be going toward: • Infrastructure • Schools • Healthcare • Community Programs • Environmental Restoration Efforts • Eliminating Food Insecurity • Poverty Reduction And more. When we don’t tax the super wealthy their fair share, they accumulate incomprehensible amounts of money while the average person continues to suffer.
English
161
13
26
2.9K
Luke Saffrett
Luke Saffrett@LSaffrett·
@FrakMAGA2022 @wholemars Buying shares in strategic companies is a good investment. Starting a war with a terrorist nation trying to develop nuclear weapons is a great idea.
English
2
0
0
7
frakmaga2025
frakmaga2025@FrakMAGA2022·
@wholemars Or, and here me out. Trump can stop putting money into companies and buying golden shares and stop spending so much on wasteful pet projects including a billion a day for the last 100+ days on a war he promised he'd never start.
English
3
0
0
80
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
Federal Budget, Fiscal Year 2025 Revenue: $5.235 trillion Spending: $7.010 trillion Deficit: $1.775 trillion short Even if you could somehow sell every stock Elon Musk owns and raise $1 trillion, we would still have a $775 billion budget deficit! And then what are you going to do the year after that, after you’ve spent all his money? On top of that, it’s not actually possible to sell all his stocks and raise $1 trillion. The stocks would tank if he was forced to sell, and be worth far less. He doesn’t actually have the ability to pull a trillion dollars out of the bank. All of these politicians are pointing the finger at Musk to try and blame him for their budgetary failures. The reality is these legislators have fucked up so badly that every cent Elon Musk has can’t plug the hole in the budget. The deficits that we have every single year. And most Americans are so stupid that they’ll actually believe these politicians instead of voting them out.
English
60
78
566
23K