TJ Curt

The Alex Jones interview they don't want you to see Years ago, Alex Jones did a 9-11 interview that has been deleted from most of the Internet...but I found it. Why is the legacy media so afraid of this?

FBI Director Kash Patel and Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll reportedly at risk of being removed, according to The Atlantic. This follows Pam Bondi and Kristi Noem both being relieved of their positions recently. Either cleaning house or things are messier behind the scenes than we know...

🚨BREAKING: Buckingham Palace has confirmed King Charles will not issue an Easter message this year

Now, the Government has called for Cole's defense attorney's to be HELD IN CONTEMPT for violating a protective order. Yes, a PROTECTIVE ORDER on a polygraph that a previous person-of-interest FAILED a polygraph asking if they planted the pipe bombs!

🇦🇹🇺🇸 Austria just rejected every single U.S. request to cross their airspace since the Iran war started. Their colonel basically said: “If it involves a country at war, we say no.” Neutrality is one thing… but this is just freeloading while hiding under NATO’s protection. Source: Disclose TV, AFP

All the large accounts that present themselves as truth-seeking journalists or commentators, then quote posts like this and act utterly baffled—“What the hell!?” “WTF!?” “What’s going on here???”—are frauds. It took me less than a minute to see what the court documents actually said and understand what they meant. They do not show that the bullet was not fired from the gun. They show only that the bullet was too fragmented to confidently link it to ANY gun. This is not uncommon, and DOES NOT mean the bullet didn’t come from Robinson’s gun. Of course the defense attorneys are going to spin this as evidence that Robinson is innocent. That is what defense attorneys do. They scrape together every possible fragment of doubt and present it as if it were fully exculpatory. It’s not. Defense lawyers are paid to downplay or ignore evidence pointing to guilt, exploit people’s cognitive biases, and make fallacious arguments sound persuasive. This information about the bullet doesn’t erode the case for Robinson’s guilt in any way. It is totally neutral on that front. And it in no way invalidate the mountain of positive and mutually corroborating lines of evidence we do have for Robinson’s guilt. You should expect more from the commentators you follow, and hold them accountable by refusing to give them your attention in the future. If they could not be bothered to spend even one minute checking the facts before spreading confusion to you and millions of others on X, they do not deserve your attention. They are nothing more than grifting engagement farmers.