पिन किया गया ट्वीट
Techdir
1.8K posts

Techdir
@Techdir8
AI Creator Experienced marketing specialist in Web3 Full content creation for media projects "AltEnter-media" agency founder.
bc1qhvv8p8fvvy820rj55e6390a28q शामिल हुए Eylül 2020
597 फ़ॉलोइंग452 फ़ॉलोवर्स

@EduardoS79 @vxylily He is not a child, that is why he need to listen himself, listen to hormonally unstable human is not the answer.
English

@Shreya_bhyl Tell you more, real grown up men love without make up girls.
English

@PeckShieldAlert @iotex_io Learn the basic, clown. That was uniswap. Thorchain is not a bridge
English

#PeckShieldAlert The IoTeX[.]io Bridge @iotex_io has been hacked for over $8M worth of crypto due to a compromised private key.
The hacker has swapped the stolen funds to $ETH and has started bridging them to #BTC via #Thorchain.


English

@thedorbrothers @AutismCapital @LinusEkenstam @minchoi @AngryTomtweets @MattWalshBlog @ianmiles @Rainmaker1973 @joerogan @DarrenAronofsky Slop of cource, the first frame is just a public grok prompt, also 3 min is not cost 200mil. You can better
English

Interesting case here around NEAR Intents
WARNING: this will probably be a very controversial post
A red market operator lost 10 BTC while using NEAR Intents
→ /sexinfochina reported the loss with screenshots
→ NEAR Intents support bot claimed "mandatory compliance review"
→ @zachxbt showed proof that the OP advertised human trafficking and other red-market services on the 'FreeCity' Telegram, justifying the seizure
On one hand, I'm happy a red market operator got screwed
On the other hand, I'm concerned that NEAR Intents is seizing people's funds under compliance justifications without clearly/openly documenting/communicating the risk to its users
If market makers (solvers) don't want to solve intents of certain users/addresses, fine, it's their right to do so and they can just NOT provide a quote for certain intents -- I have absolutely zero problems with that (I probably wouldn't have executed this guy's transaction either)
Solvers are entities operating in a free market
→ they can just choose not to do business with some people 🤷
But locking and seizing the funds is something else
(if this is really what happened here)
It opens many vulnerabilities to the protocol that governments and other control-freak entities can exploit... This is not good... This is not what a DEX looks like
Today it's seizing funds from red market operators, but who draws the line?
We all agree that red market users are bad
The problem my post is addressing is not about who is being affected right now, but that the protocol can do that -- and that this can, in the future, be abused to comply with unethical regulations affecting grey (or black) market users, for example
If anything, this risk should've been clearly communicated and documented with a warning that the MPC network can freeze and seize funds that do not match a compliance standard required to use it, and what this compliance standard is
→ this is a bare minimum and should be addressed immediately, imo
cc @AlexAuroraDev @chronear @ilblackdragon
I would be ok with that, although it inevitably exposes the protocol's centralization and I'll likely stop promoting NEAR Intents as a decentralized venue from now on, as this, by definition, makes the protocol a CEX (a very good and well-distributed CEX, imo, probably the best out there, but still)
Would love to hear people's thoughts on that as I know many will disagree with me (I know it's a highly controversial topic)
Did I miss anything? What do you think?
cc @TheDesertLynx @d3h3d_

English

@dogeofficialceo this is not AI iguess it's blender or some other slop animated old fashion way
English

@AVGirl4Life Those who are asking grok about what is the movie need to start learning cultural studies. Of course this is
Lilu Dallas multipass lore.
English

Techdir रीट्वीट किया

Don't need your fucking crypto,
Don't need your dirty games!
youtube.com/watch?v=3KfIfD…

YouTube
English
Techdir रीट्वीट किया























