
VoidWalker
3.1K posts



Excited to advise @Kalshi as they continue to dominate the prediction market space. They're one of the fastest growing companies in the US — and one of the rare tech platforms that take a regulatory first approach.




Here's the most transparent test that Claude Code's scam 👇 After this announcement, for just testing, I bought $50 credit because my Max Plan had hit the weekly limits. I just made two code reviews (not complex) by updating Claude Code with Sonnet 4.6 (NOT OPUS) and a fresh session ; it directly consumed ~$20. But the more strange thing is that I used an API key for exactly the same code review by using OpenCode (Opus 4.6 Max effort), and it only consumed $5.30 (OpenCode findings were more detailed). Anthropic is just a scam now; it is disappointing and doesn't deserve any money. Simply, I am quitting until they give us an explanation. Also, a note, they are not refunding anything even you prove there is a bug, and they are consuming your credits! I'm also sharing my feedback IDs. Maybe you can really figure out what you've done wrong. You are just losing your promoters and community! - Feedback ID: 1d22e80f-f522-4f03-a54e-3a6e1a329c49 - Feedback ID: 84dbb7c9-6b69-4c00-8770-ce5e1bc64715 @AnthropicAI @claudeai !















Anthropic CEO: “ I have engineers within anthropic who don’t write any code, they just let Claude write the code and they edit it and look it over” “At anthropic writing code means designing the next version of Claude it self, so we essentially have Claude designing the next version of Claude itself, not completely but most of it”. In the last 52 days, the Claude team dropped 50+ major feature launches. This is literally INSANE.


Anthropic CEO: “In the next 3 to 6 months, AI will write 90% of the code, and within 12 months, nearly all code may be generated by AI.” the job isn’t coding anymore, it’s telling machines what to build.



If AI can now solve math, discover physics and chemistry breakthroughs faster than human PhDs, why are we still training humans to be physicists? Serious question. Should education shift from 'learn to do X' to 'learn to direct AI doing X'? The wrong direction costs a generation their careers.



@artyomvnsv true, but LLMs have a low ceiling. Too much context is required. By the time you feed it 100 architecture and opinion docs, it can't utilize them all. Breaking it down into specialized agents that loop results in agent fights and further degrade quality.


Apparently, Xiao and Peak can't leave China and are detained















