Hudson Nash, M.Sc.

21K posts

Hudson Nash, M.Sc. banner
Hudson Nash, M.Sc.

Hudson Nash, M.Sc.

@Ax_The_Crap

Free mental health consultations. When nothing is true...anything is possible.

British Columbia Bergabung Haziran 2022
2.2K Mengikuti799 Pengikut
Tweet Disematkan
Hudson Nash, M.Sc.
Hudson Nash, M.Sc.@Ax_The_Crap·
For the smooth brained boomers in the back! Ran into a certain "nurse" who didn't know the differences. Absolutely embarrassing. Germs: Understand and protect against bacteria, viruses and infections - Mayo Clinic share.google/wjthvhespEHkOy…
English
1
0
10
2.2K
Ian Copeland, PhD
Ian Copeland, PhD@IanCopeland5·
Ivermectin does treat: 1) Parasitic infestations 2) Rosacea Ivermectin does not: 1) Hantavirus 2) COVID-19 3) Any viral infection 4) (Unfortunately) Stupidity
English
55
128
1K
12.6K
Woodsplitter
Woodsplitter@HelpsLogic·
@EdoajoEric @IanCopeland5 Pop quiz: why do so many individuals report positive outcomes from ivermectin yet the NIH refused to do a study under Fauci?
English
4
0
1
63
Bexter Jones
Bexter Jones@BexterZ·
How much does Big Pharma pay you? PFIZER HAS OFFICIALLY JUST PUBLISHED THE LIST OF POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS OF ITS COVID VACCINE!! IT'S CRIMINAL! 1) Blood clot 2) Acute kidney injury 3) Acute flaccid myelitis 4) Positive anti-sperm antibodies 5) Brainstem embolism 6) Brainstem thrombosis 7) Cardiac arrest (hundreds of cases) 8) Heart failure 9) Cardiac ventricular thrombosis 10) Cardiogenic shock 11) Central nervous system vasculitis 12) Neonatal death 13) Deep vein thrombosis 14) Brainstem encephalitis 15) Hemorrhagic encephalitis 16) Frontal lobe epilepsy 17) Epileptic psychosis 18) Facial paralysis 19) Fetal distress syndrome 20) Gastrointestinal amyloidosis 21) Generalized tonic-clonic seizure 22) Hashimoto's encephalopathy 23) Hepatic vascular thrombosis 24) Shingles reactivation 25) Cancer reactivation 26) Turbo cancers 27) Immune-mediated hepatitis 28) Interstitial lung disease 29) Jugular vein embolism 30) Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy 31) Liver damage 32) Low birth weight 34) Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children 35) Myocarditis 36) Neonatal seizure 37) Pancreatitis 38) Pneumonia 39) Stillbirth 40) Tachycardia 41) Temporal lobe epilepsy 43) Testicular autoimmunity 44) Thrombotic stroke 45) Type 1 diabetes mellitus 46) Neonatal vein thrombosis 47) Vertebral artery thrombosis 48) Pericarditis 49) Sudden infant death syndrome SEVERE CONSEQUENCES of a so-called vaccine that protects neither against the disease, nor its transmission, nor severe forms!
English
2
0
2
58
Dr. Brian Goldman
Dr. Brian Goldman@NightShiftMD·
“VAERS — a passive reporting system with no control group and reporting biases of heterogeneous, unknown magnitude — cannot establish vaccine harm.”
Prof Jeffrey S Morris@jsm2334

What exactly are the allegations, and what is the scandal? That a new VAERS analytic method, published in mid-2022 — one more prone to false positives (look at clear false positive events on its flagged list and think through how the method will naturally increase certain types of false positives ) and whose authors did not investigate its specificity or false positive rate — wasn’t used to identify safety signals in 2021? Before building an argument on a method, one should first demonstrate its statistical properties. And regardless, anyone familiar with VAERS and the broader vaccine safety monitoring ecosystem knows that VAERS — a passive reporting system with no control group and reporting biases of heterogeneous, unknown magnitude — cannot establish vaccine harm. What it can do is generate hypotheses: potential safety signals that then must be evaluated in active surveillance systems and in population- and health-system-level studies to determine whether the event is in fact at increased risk after vaccination. So why don’t those making these allegations look at such studies? Several of the events they claim “should have been flagged” have already been investigated in exactly that way. Here is a paper that walks through the various components of the U.S. vaccine safety monitoring system and offers concrete suggestions for improving both sensitivity and specificity in detecting, validating, and characterizing true vaccine harms: annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/new-white-pape…

English
18
7
49
4.1K
Hudson Nash, M.Sc. me-retweet
Ian Copeland, PhD
Ian Copeland, PhD@IanCopeland5·
So COVID-19 killed millions of people. Not a single antivaxer cared. Hantavirus has killed 3 people and the antivaxers are about to lose thier minds. I will never understand the antivax paradigm of thought...
English
108
58
457
9.1K
The Architect.
The Architect.@TheMarcitect·
I grew up on a farm and I spent a lot of time in old barns unintentionally inhaling and playing in more mouse feces than you could imagine. Nobody and I mean nobody I knew ever contracted Hantavirus. This is just another psyops to get more people jabbed. Don't take it.
English
824
4K
20.3K
169.5K
RuthMurrayne
RuthMurrayne@r_murrayne·
@IanCopeland5 Sir, I see you're a geneticist. People in your profession ought to be the ones front and center teaching that there are two genders only.
English
1
0
0
433
_
_@Mat_Vana·
@Ax_The_Crap @Nezarecs @DrNeilStone YOURE** a retard and got cooked. Couldnt even reply to me cuz of how bad you got cooked. 😂😂😂💀
English
1
0
0
16
_
_@Mat_Vana·
@Ax_The_Crap @DrNeilStone "Your in luck", cant even use grammar properly and YOURE expecting me to listen to you. Lmfao laughable. Maybe stick to your day job, retard. You CANT be this stupid.
_ tweet media
English
5
0
4
45
Hudson Nash, M.Sc.
Hudson Nash, M.Sc.@Ax_The_Crap·
@Mat_Vana @DrNeilStone Well your in luck! I can help you. A virus cant be a side effect of this vaccine. What you're seeing there isn't side effects. Do I need to explain more? Do I need to explain what that is you're reading? Im sure someone has explained it to you already. No?
English
1
0
6
58
_
_@Mat_Vana·
@Ax_The_Crap @DrNeilStone Correct! And congratulations! You can read! Virus is in the name. Good job lil buddy!
English
1
0
0
93
gattaca
gattaca@sweetbud538015·
@DrNeilStone So I'll survive 60% of yhe time? Great odds. Better than gambling.
English
1
0
0
73
Ian Copeland, PhD
Ian Copeland, PhD@IanCopeland5·
This is false. There is no clinical trial data that shows Ivermectin works against Hantavirus. Further, there is no clinical trial evidence that Ivermectin blocks viral entry or impedes the activity of ANY virus. Including COVID-19. If there is, don't reply to me with a mechanistic study, speech or an anecdote. Just drop the link to the clinical trial and I'll be happy to concede...
Ian Copeland, PhD tweet media
English
182
307
2.2K
65.6K
The Disrespected Trucker
The Disrespected Trucker@DisrespectedThe·
Hantavirus pulmonary listed as a side affect from the Pfizer Covid vaccine? What? Is this why they wanted to hide this info until 2085?
The Disrespected Trucker tweet media
English
654
11.8K
22.1K
1.1M