Dunedain

977 posts

Dunedain banner
Dunedain

Dunedain

@CryptoDunedain

Traversing the Middle-Earth

Westfold Bergabung Mart 2018
197 Mengikuti61 Pengikut
Dunedain
Dunedain@CryptoDunedain·
@tonyfcarter @kelly_simonx @viserism @TrackGazette Well, due to a couple of technicalities. All the "straight" ones are not comparable. The Mennea run was hand-timed, so not comparable either, and Johnson's time was just a split en route to his 19.32s run in the 200m. The 150m on a bend is rarely run, simple as that.
English
1
0
2
135
Track & Field Gazette
Track & Field Gazette@TrackGazette·
WORLD RECORD!!! Kishane Thompson 🇯🇲 clocks a time of 14.92s (1.3) to win the men's 150m at the Miramar Invitational! He breaks the World Record in the event. Tapiwanashe Makarawu 🇿🇼 was 2nd in African Record of 14.96s, followed by Adrian Kerr 🇯🇲 was 3rd in 15.21s.
Track & Field Gazette tweet media
English
18
553
2.5K
63.9K
Track & Field Gazette
Track & Field Gazette@TrackGazette·
Christian Coleman 🇺🇸 wins his heat at the Stawell Gift in Australia!
English
11
15
301
27.7K
Dunedain
Dunedain@CryptoDunedain·
@Julianthebull @Saganismm the astronauts should still get some pretty crazy views of the moon with the earth in the background
English
0
0
0
39
Julian 🌟
Julian 🌟@Julianthebull·
@Saganismm There won't be such thing like this since the picture was part of a landing whereas this Artemis II mission is an approach (of roughly 5.000 miles away).
English
1
1
4
1.1K
Saganism
Saganism@Saganismm·
This photo was taken by astronaut Michael Collins in 1969. With the entire Earth in view, along with the lander carrying Armstrong and Aldrin, Collins was the only human being not in the frame. We are going to get a new view of Earth from lunar orbit soon.
Saganism tweet media
English
44
378
3.4K
51.7K
Dunedain
Dunedain@CryptoDunedain·
@FunkyDL @photo2electric There's also a chance he'd still be alive, given the longevity of a lot of these early astronauts.
English
0
0
2
80
Funky D
Funky D@FunkyDL·
@photo2electric According to Deke Slayton, who picked astronaut crews, Gus would have likely been the first man on the Moon had he lived.
English
1
0
17
395
ren
ren@siennapotterz·
no Dominic Mclaughlin does not look like a girl, or a lesbian or whatever adjectives that are being thrown at him. He looks like a normal healthy 12 year old pre pubescent CHILD. Either y'all are blind or sick in the heads. Get a life, losers.
English
11
71
691
12.1K
Dunedain me-retweet
Aaron Francis
Aaron Francis@aarondfrancis·
Imagine winning this hard. Impossible
Aaron Francis tweet media
English
538
5K
66.9K
5.2M
Funmilayo 🐺
Funmilayo 🐺@Iammarels·
@MichaelBlaq He has 43.3 PB, with his improved performances in the shorter sprints, he can break the world record
English
2
0
1
1.2K
marsfoole
marsfoole@marsfoole·
@memeticsisyphus Dude these fucking people are getting on my last nerve. This launch has shined a light and the 70IQ cockroaches are everywhere.
English
5
1
336
5K
DemonstrableReality
DemonstrableReality@flatsmackin·
You can’t fall “around” the earth. You either fall straight down to the ground, or you fly above it. You can’t fall sideways.
DemonstrableReality tweet media
English
174
0
38
135.6K
Dunedain
Dunedain@CryptoDunedain·
@TrackGazette Impressive time, but he maybe went a bit too hard given that this was a semi and the lead he had in the last 50m
English
0
0
0
793
Track & Field Gazette
Track & Field Gazette@TrackGazette·
Bayapo Ndori 🇧🇼 clocks 44.69s to lead the men's 400m semis at the Botswana Athletics Championships!
English
3
70
471
66.3K
Track & Field Gazette
Track & Field Gazette@TrackGazette·
Watch 400m World Champion Collen Kebinatshipi 🇧🇼 run a blazing PB of 9.89 (0.8) over 100m at the Botswana Athletics Championships! The first man in the world under 10 seconds in 2026.
English
82
520
2.9K
285K
Dunedain me-retweet
Prometheus
Prometheus@CaribbeanRythms·
Kudos to the finance degree, genuinely but this is a different domain entirely. In engineering, the loss of technology isn’t uncommon nor is it inherently catastrophic. The idea that “we lost the ability to go to the moon” sounds stupid to people but it follows a pattern we see all the time. FOGBANK is the example I love to use. FOGBANK was a classified material essential to the W76 nuclear warhead, a kind of aerogel if you will . Sometime by the 1990’s the warheads were being decommissioned and the facility that produced it (as well as many other ones critical to the warheads lifecycle) was shut down and the small group of specialists (only a few hundred people) retired. By the early 2000s, when the US government wanted to extend the warhead’s lifecycle, they discovered that the process for producing FOGBANK had effectively been lost. Recreating it was a fucking disaster . Around hundreds of millions were spent attempting to reverse engineer the material and in doing initially reproduced it too perfectly. The original formulation relied on impurities introduced by older and less refined production methods that were absent in the modern process. Here, modern methods improving the purity stripped the oxide layer making the material nonfunctional. Those “imperfections” were in fact essential. So in essence it took years and hundreds of millions of dollars to approximate what had once been produced routinely. Returning to the moon isn’t any different. It’s not that it’s impossible it’s that it requires rebuilding an entire ecosystem from the ground up which involves redefining engineering standards, requalifying or replacing vendors capable of extreme precision (many of whom no longer exist), retraining a specialized workforce, integrating modern technologies, and revalidating everything through rigorous testing and safety protocols. From the outside, it’s easy to assume you can simply “rebuild” and scale it like an assembly line. In reality, the system that made it possible the first time no longer exists. We can disagree and be skeptical but I don’t like contrarianism for the sake of it .
⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬@SolBrah

For what it's worth I have a Master's in Applied Finance -my maths is fine. None of your insults are an argument. You used a picture of the incredible engineering of rockets; something I never have denied because it's extremely obvious that is real and we can all see them working. However, none of that validates the BS they try to pass off as moon landing "evidence". It's as simple as that. You can have reverence for European engineering, as I do, without swallowing the absolute farce that they put in the slopbucket to the normie masses. There are too many inconsistencies and intuitively suspicious informations that don't add up: "We destroyed the technology to go back lol". Couple that with researching the ancient schools of thought and other historical civilizations that had other conceptions of "outer space", speaking of the firmament, the lunar bodies or the realm we inhabit - and you begin to question the narrative they feed us that results in them pocketing billions of dollars. Just like they said you can't question the "Covid" narrative unless you are a doctor etc; its wrong to say that you can't question something that seems suspicious if you're outside of their particular education system. That being said, we're free to disagree, and I'm free to question things, which I will always do if it doesn't seem right to me.

English
38
65
1.1K
35.8K
Dunedain me-retweet
Prometheus
Prometheus@CaribbeanRythms·
this is the average moon landing denier: >never applied himself in a technical field >can’t do basic math problems let alone trigonometry, calculus, linear algebra >”what’s a vector?” >has never set foot in an engineering workspace >never seen a P&ID let alone read one >never coded >can’t read a schematic >confuses mass and weight >confuses voltage, current, and resistance >”bernoullis principle?” >cannot calculate slope between two points >”I love Ancient Greeks, wrestling naked in the sun. Wait, pythagorean theorem? why would I need that? >does not understand order of operations >struggles with exponents and powers >cannot work with fractions or ratios >doesn’t know the difference between diameter, circumference and radius of a circle >essentially mathematically illiterate >thinks g force is a watch I’d like to convince you one day about how great of an achievement this was for humanity, Sol.
Prometheus tweet media
⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬@SolBrah

They want you believe this aluminium foil wrapped hunk of junk went to the moon and back. The amount of fluoride in the brain to swallow this is staggering.

English
259
770
9.1K
411.6K
Dunedain
Dunedain@CryptoDunedain·
@SolBrah @sainimatic I'm surprised you can read. Also wager you didn't read Orwell lol
English
0
0
44
1.3K
⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬
@sainimatic “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” George Orwell, 1984
English
55
1
141
24.1K
⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬
They want you believe this aluminium foil wrapped hunk of junk went to the moon and back. The amount of fluoride in the brain to swallow this is staggering.
⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬 tweet media
English
600
371
3K
885.9K
Dunedain
Dunedain@CryptoDunedain·
@stackhodler Prepare to receive comments from retards
English
1
0
7
273
Stack Hodler
Stack Hodler@stackhodler·
You look at the United States today and of course you don't believe they put a man on the moon in 1969 But go watch the Apollo 11 documentary on Amazon What you'll see is an entirely different country full of people that basically no longer exist today A serious, focused, rational, and united people with a common goal They had a pack of tin foil and less computing power than a microwave oven... But they understood physics They knew how to build things And most of all, they had belief Why wouldn't they? They were from the country that invented flight itself If two bike mechanics from the midwest could accomplish something that even the great da Vinci only dreamed of... Why couldn't a team of the brightest minds in the most powerful country in the world come together to put a man on the moon? As time goes on, fewer people believe that the scientists and engineers of the 60's actually put a man on the moon But that says more about our own time than theirs Go tour the Mont Saint-Michel in France and you'll realize that progress isn't always linear They built that place 500+ years ago, but no one could imagine us building it today Yet no one denies it's there. It sits there as a high watermark in architectural history, reminding us what we are no longer capable of. The moon landing is a lot easier to deny. You can't see it with your own eyes. And what you do see with your own eyes makes it hard to believe it was possible.
Stack Hodler tweet mediaStack Hodler tweet media
English
208
559
4.9K
281.8K
mattbnelson
mattbnelson@mattbnelson·
@AmazingSpace2 That animation is a lie. The fuel in the SRBs gets used from the bottom up, or more accurately, from the central core out to the walls.
English
4
0
14
1.7K
Amazing Space
Amazing Space@AmazingSpace2·
Artemis II animation - fuel use during launch
English
66
1.5K
9.5K
616K
Dunedain me-retweet
𝙂𝙐𝙉𝘽𝙄𝙍𝘿🇺🇸
Me blocking every account I see on my timeline expressing even the tiniest amount of pessimism about spaceflight
GIF
English
39
413
5.8K
40K
Lucid™
Lucid™@cammakingminds·
If you are using the earth as a reference frame, the moon is actually doing a close flyby of Artemis II.
GIF
English
196
1.8K
16.1K
3.3M