Deepak Chatterjee

1.6K posts

Deepak Chatterjee banner
Deepak Chatterjee

Deepak Chatterjee

@Deepak33C

Non-Ex. Chairman UTI MF AMC Board. Former CEO, IIFCL Projects Ltd., New Delhi. Former MD & CEO, SBI Mutual Fund, Mumbai. Author of ARE YOU REALLY HAPPY?

New Delhi Bergabung Temmuz 2013
507 Mengikuti373 Pengikut
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Makarand R Paranjape, Ph.D. (Illinois)
"If @TCS has 'a long-standing zero-tolerance policy towards harassment and coercion of any form', how come they tolerated predatory sexual harassment in the workplace for so long? Why did it take undercover female police officers to figure this out?" What do you think?
English
96
428
1.1K
12.6K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Anand Ranganathan
Anand Ranganathan@ARanganathan72·
Hindu women were blackmailed, fed beef, coerced to convert, and sexually assaulted by their Muslim team leads. For four years. Their complaints were ignored. The women worked in @TCS, that just reported a revenue of 2.6 lac crores. TCS is yet to issue a statement or an apology.
Anand Ranganathan tweet media
English
1.2K
15K
41.1K
629.6K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Ratan Sharda 🇮🇳 रतन शारदा
ONLY IN INDIA - We have Indian politicians & intellectuals who celebrate every smaller success of Pakistan, every setback to Bharat. They get upset with every success of Bharat. Who needs enemies?
English
292
1.9K
6.6K
63.2K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Minhaz Merchant
Minhaz Merchant@MinhazMerchant·
India’s new fast breeder nuclear reactor puts the country alongside the US & Russia which have this technology that uses thorium as fuel. France & Japan tried & failed. China still trying to scale up. See excellent thread by @carolin_frazier👇 @carolin_frazier/post/DW1ImqYjd9O?xmt=AQF0g0Xm0l9Fq7-QemgRiFZpTiwFeE8TMkKXN13NSsthhx3fa04dhqK9_9EQ9ANkZMSQPprH&slof=1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">threads.com/@carolin_frazi
English
13
169
589
27.4K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Pathikrit Payne
Pathikrit Payne@live_pathikrit·
#ModiGovt silently worked to enhance capacity of renewable energy while expanding thermal power production. Imagine if India, to keep Climate Lobbies Happy, had opted for GAS BASED POWER PLANTS. Imagine what India wud have faced today. Watch #DefTalks youtube.com/live/-_Vv-xrX8…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
9
24
629
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)
The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)@Indian_Analyzer·
🚨UN Throwback! Switzerland: "India must take effective measures to protect MINORITIES & uphold FOE" 🗣️ India’s reply: "We're always ready to help Switzerland deal with issues of RASCISM, systemic discrimination & XENOPHOBIA within its own society."😂💀
English
146
4.8K
24.6K
500.2K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Minhaz Merchant
Minhaz Merchant@MinhazMerchant·
These useful idiots will never tell you that despite inheriting a broken, colonised economy in 1947 followed by 50 years of socialist economic policies, India is today no. 1-3 producer GLOBALLY in these industries: 1)Steel; 2) Cement; 3) Passenger cars; 4) Pharmaceuticals; 5) Mobile phones; 6) Cotton; 7) Iron ore; 8) Food; 9) Tea; 10) Salt; 11) Software; 12) Startups; 13) Tractors 14) Two-wheelers; 15) Rice; 16) Milk & diary. And 17) Mir Jafars.
Minhaz Merchant@MinhazMerchant

India has a collection of useful idiots—editors, podcasters, etc—who constantly compare India with China. Everything a vicious Communist (but oh so farsighted) regime does is lauded in sycophantic prose. India? Naah. Can’t do a thing right. Macaulay must be smiling in his grave.

English
47
298
739
18.7K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Minhaz Merchant
Minhaz Merchant@MinhazMerchant·
India has a collection of useful idiots—editors, podcasters, etc—who constantly compare India with China. Everything a vicious Communist (but oh so farsighted) regime does is lauded in sycophantic prose. India? Naah. Can’t do a thing right. Macaulay must be smiling in his grave.
English
59
252
858
53K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Lloyd Mathias
Lloyd Mathias@LloydMathias·
Leander Paes has been getting a lot of hate since yesterday for joining the BJP. He’s served India on the court for decades, but clearly those grand slams don’t mean much the moment he makes a personal political choice. The “liberal” mask slips so fast - from celebrating a legend to cancelling him overnight! Question for the so called “liberals”: Is tolerance only for those who agree with you?
Lloyd Mathias tweet mediaLloyd Mathias tweet mediaLloyd Mathias tweet media
English
34
314
1.3K
30.2K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Anand Ranganathan
Anand Ranganathan@ARanganathan72·
Indian Foreign Secretary @NMenonRao laughing heartily as she shakes hands with her Pak counterpart Salman Bashir in New Delhi on July 26, 2011, barely two weeks after Pakistani terrorists Waqqas and Danish funded by LeT bombed Mumbai on July 13, 2011 killing 26 innocent Indians.
Anand Ranganathan tweet media
English
831
5.9K
15K
302.6K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Aadi Achint 🇮🇳
Aadi Achint 🇮🇳@AadiAchint·
Oh Please.. thank you but no thank you!!! Engagement with whom? People who support terrorism and please don't tell me there is a small section in Pakistan that does that and the rest are just "wonderful" people.. When children in that country are being taught to finish and kill India, we here are sitting with dreams of having rational conversations!!! Are you by any chance calling our nation Non Serious??? Madam, you may be senior and all, but you were at the time representing people who were unaware about history and reality, keenly being hidden by so called dialoguebaazi even now!!! TIMES HAVE CHANGED!!! Dialogues and the """Diplomacy""" POLICIES FAILED MISERABLY. This is a public platform, if you are not open to criticism, I would recommend closing your account. Lastly.. To talk to Pakistan, YES YOU DO NEED OUR PERMISSION.. WE ARE THE PEOPLE OF THIS NATION.. Last I checked its the people on whom this nation is made, unlike in Pakistan where a few will decide what will happen and rest are expected to follow.
Nirupama Menon Rao 🇮🇳@NMenonRao

@AadiAchint No one needs “permission” to think about India’s interests. Engagement is not endorsement, and exploring options is not surrender. Deterrence and dialogue are not opposites, they are instruments. Serious nations use both. And, mind your language.

English
24
214
767
14.3K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Lloyd Mathias
Lloyd Mathias@LloydMathias·
Dear @virsanghvi isn't it interesting how @TheEconomist finds 'genius' in diagnosing the Indian psyche as 'browbeaten,' yet stays silent when Hollywood blockbusters like Air Force One or Independence Day cinematically turn the American Presidency into a messianic action-hero cult? And we all now how REAL that is! When Harrison Ford single-handedly terminates terrorists, it’s 'cinema' but when an Indian film celebrates its own heroes, it’s 'propaganda.' The selective amnesia of the Western critic remains the most imaginative fiction of all...but what can one say about eminent Indian editors like you, who don't see through these obvious double-standards? #Dhurandhar2@AdityaDharFilms
vir sanghvi@virsanghvi

Here’s @TheEconomist on Dhurandhar 2. “Some of the biggest cheers for “The Revenge” at the showing Banyan attended erupted not when patriotic dialogue is delivered, nor when Pakistanis are finished off in increasingly imaginative ways, nor even when the sneering terrorist has his brains blown out. The loudest cheers came when the screen lit up with news footage of Mr Modi, the bravest Hindu of all. But to dismiss “Dhurandhar” as propaganda is to miss something important. It did not become a monster hit by trying to convince viewers of an alternate reality. Its genius is to reflect the world many Indians, browbeaten by years of shrill pro-Modi messaging on TV news and social media, already believe to be real.”

English
88
559
1.8K
73K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Mahesh Jethmalani
Mahesh Jethmalani@JethmalaniM·
That is the fraud. American power on screen is “craft.” British power on screen is “heritage.” Indian power on screen is suddenly evidence of political conditioning. Same cinema. Same nationalism. Different skin colour. The Economist has a wonderfully colonial rulebook for cinema. When America straps a camera to Pentagon hardware and sells state power with a soundtrack, it is “spectacle.” When a film is made with CIA-adjacent mythology around national revenge, it is “serious storytelling.” But when India puts its own enemies and terrorist attack scars on screen, suddenly the magazine reaches for the psychiatrist’s couch. That is the real joke here. Fighter jets, spies, commandos and national vengeance are perfectly acceptable as long as the flag fluttering in the background is American or British. Then it is culture. It is craft. It is cinema doing what cinema does. The Economist has invented a very elegant little rule for cinema: Top Gun: Maverick can fly on Pentagon muscle, RAMBO & Zero Dark Thirty can ride CIA mythology, James Bond can sell six decades of British spy glamour, Dunkirk can turn wartime memory into national legend, and all of that is called storytelling. But the moment India puts terror, retaliation and national memory on screen with Dhurandhar, the magazine starts diagnosing the audience instead of reviewing the film. What @TheEconomist cannot digest is not one film. It is the fact that Indians are no longer outsourcing their memory to London’s approval. A country that has lived through decades of Pakistan-sponsored terror is apparently expected to process all that pain in whispers, with tasteful disclaimers, and preferably under the supervision of foreign editors who still think they are qualified to explain India to Indians. And that is why the review reeks. Not of sophistication, but of the old imperial tic: Western nationalism on screen is a nation telling its story; Indian nationalism on screen is a pathology requiring diagnosis. The costume has changed. The sneer has not. The funniest part is that The Economist probably thinks this is fearless criticism. It is not. It is just another imported lecture from people who never mind propaganda when it wears aviators, a tuxedo, or a CIA badge, but develop exquisite moral sensitivity the moment India stops being apologetic on its own screen. Just FYI: Decades of Pakistan-sponsored terror are apparently meant to be processed quietly, apologetically, and preferably without ever producing a mass-market cultural response. That is the old script. India is no longer following it.
The Economist@TheEconomist

The genius of “Dhurandhar” is to reflect the world many Indians, browbeaten by years of shrill pro-Modi messaging on TV news and social media, already believe to be real economist.com/asia/2026/03/2…

English
203
3.4K
10.6K
252.9K
Deepak Chatterjee
Deepak Chatterjee@Deepak33C·
@ANI Only an attention seeker. Am sure there are laws to deal with such derogatory comments for one community.
English
0
1
1
41
ANI
ANI@ANI·
#WATCH | Kolkata | TMC MP Mahua Moitra says, "Bengalis are a very proud race. We led the war for independence against the British. Who were the Gujaratis?... 68% of the names of the people who were killed and incarcerated in Kala Pani were Bengalis, followed by Punjabis. Can you name me one Gujarati who was there, apart from your big hero, Veer Savarkar, who only wanted to sit and write apology letters? Please let us know..."
English
2.4K
586
3.4K
2M
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Anand Ranganathan
Anand Ranganathan@ARanganathan72·
Amplifying "There is no deity except Allah and no one has the right to be worshipped but Him" through a loudspeaker five times a day is promoting amity, but peacefully chanting Durga Suktam while not denigrating anyone else's religion or God is promoting enmity. @Kompella_MLatha
Anand Ranganathan tweet media
English
366
7.2K
22.6K
268.5K
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
News Algebra
News Algebra@NewsAlgebraIND·
Madhavi Latha went to the women’s prayer room at Delhi airport and started reciting "Durga Stuti"
English
990
3.5K
20.6K
1.1M
Deepak Chatterjee me-retweet
Rohit
Rohit@Iam_Rohit_G·
News Articles on Indian Rafale going down during Operation Sindoor (Without Proofs) : The Washington Post : 7 The New York Times : 8 THE WIRE : 15 Al Jazeera : 12 The Independent: 6 Reuters: 11 News Articles on 16 American Fighter Jets going down during Epic Furry (With Proofs) : The Washington Post : 0 The New York Times : 0 THE WIRE : 0 Al Jazeera : 0 The Independent: 0 Reuters: 0 Do you see the double Standards!!
English
296
5.1K
17.3K
413.1K
Deepak Chatterjee
Deepak Chatterjee@Deepak33C·
@ajaykraina @ZavierIndia Thanks for sharing this. What I do is keep all additional stuff like chargers, watch, watch charger etc. in a small recognisable pouch and place that pouch on the tray. Just keep the mobile and tablet separately on the tray. This has world well.
English
0
0
1
96
Col AJ🇮🇳
Col AJ🇮🇳@ajaykraina·
A new learning today; a situation that could have turned nasty! Here is the detail: -Happened with me during the security check at the Mumbai T2 Airport today. -I used one tray to keep my laptop bag, and another with pad, headphones, wallet, goggles and all charging wires, adaptors etc that are now part of our bags these days. -Once cleared by the security, I picked up the trays and walked to the counter where I shoved all the wires and other things into the bag, put on headphones and goggles and moved to the boarding area. -All well as we took off. -After landing at Jammu, a young man intercepted me at the aerobridge itself and requested me to come onto one side and told me there was an extra phone charger in my bag and it didn't belong to me. -Handed over the bag and two chargers emerged. -I was surprised if not taken back. The young man, very courteous in behaviour, took down my details and as we started walking towards the baggage reclaim area, he suggested that I might like to apologise. -Now, this was a shocker and I asked him why should I apologise? I asked him to watch the video again and see if I had picked up the charger from someone else's tray in which case I should be booked and not left with a mere apology. -As we came down from the terminal, his senior met us. I asked the same Q and told them to prove my guilt. I wasn't apogising, I told them. -The senior guy took a look at the CCTV video and told me to carry on. The stroy ends there but the thought doesn't. Apparently, the person who owned the other charger, had placed it in my tray for the reasons best known to that person. The persons at Jammu Airport were telling me that I should have been careful while shifting the stuff into my bag. To that, my answer was simple. Who really counts the wires and plugs at that juncture? At least I don't. Many a time, we are on a phone call while repacking our stuff, assured of the fact that whatever is there in our trays belongs to us. I wonder if @IndiGo6E (or whosoever deals with this) will be kind enough to check the complete video and find out how and why? Putting own stuff into someone else's tray and not claiming it on the spot is something that needs to be looked into. But the lesson/learning is this: It is better to have all such adapters, wires, chargers etc pre-packed in a transparent bag before putting them in your bag. It will ensure neither our stuff spills over nor someone else's stuff lands up in our trays. I can only imagine the embarrassment if a more humble person were there in my place. The whole picture could have been painted as a matter of theft! Just imagine.
English
271
538
2.3K
167.1K