Rae

27.8K posts

Rae banner
Rae

Rae

@RadaNotSay

Mostly into computers and dogs 👩‍💻 sometimes I paint, sometimes I work out, sometimes I make cookies, sometimes I play games. poly 🌈

Toronto? Bergabung Aralık 2013
549 Mengikuti3.1K Pengikut
Cartoons Hate Her!
Cartoons Hate Her!@CartoonsHateHer·
I need this for my article tomorrow but I know basically nothing about sports, so ladies, which professional athletes do you consider the most attractive? lol
English
143
2
222
46.2K
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
@ShlomoSolomons @sibaburck @_livy_lou But I recognize it as a selfish and immoral solution. You and I are saying that feeling safe from ED issues supersedes animals’ right to life or freedom. They don’t have a choice. I think important to spell it out and constantly look to move away from harm
English
0
0
1
29
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
@ShlomoSolomons @sibaburck @_livy_lou So I’m in a similar boat. I have a lifelong history of EDs and between that and rigorous intense work out schedule have a very specific diet with cottage cheese, yogurt and egg whites most days, and salmon on some days.
English
1
0
1
63
SB Ⓥ
SB Ⓥ@sibaburck·
Has anyone ever met someone who genuinely has vegan values and authentically wants to be a vegan but can’t? I would love to meet one of these people and hear their perspective. I’ve only ever met people who use them as cover for their own optional meat eating.
naomi@lachancenaomi27

@grain_eater People live in food deserts where they don’t have access to a variety of food

English
38
24
755
35.5K
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
@sibaburck I totally misread your original response as looking down on the people who go vegan for the cow-eye-contact reasons.
English
2
0
4
94
SB Ⓥ
SB Ⓥ@sibaburck·
@RadaNotSay I went vegan because I passed a cattle transport truck and made eye contact with a cow and got very emotional. At least that planted the seed. I went vegan a few years later but the cow was with me permanently and I could never enjoy a burger again.
English
1
1
29
447
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
Good point. Look for good vegans, not those idiots that witnessed an act of cruelty and decided they don’t want to participate in that. Avoid those numbskulls at any cost.
SB Ⓥ@sibaburck

@morallawwithin You hang in intelligent circles. Many(I think most) vegans are people who started crying when they saw a cattle transport truck and made eye contact with a cow (or something emotional like that).

English
3
0
8
1.1K
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
@KeruboSk I think only with processed foods for some reason. Like various gummy bears and processed candies and such. Not sure why
English
0
0
0
54
Sophia ❣️
Sophia ❣️@KeruboSk·
I didn’t even know this was a thing. Texture vs. taste: have you ever disliked a food purely because of how it feels, even though the flavor was actually good?
English
2.8K
572
8K
401.8K
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
Suppose you can pick: OPTION A: ice cream and cookies you eat for the rest of your life have nutritional value of water OPTION B: one child who can’t walk can walk again OPTION C: A but only if you magically forget you had the choice, otherwise B
English
2
0
1
460
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
@mblasterx I know that’s what he’s saying, I’m saying I don’t think that’s the best approach
English
3
0
0
192
Valentin @ NYC
Valentin @ NYC@mblasterx·
@RadaNotSay Why would that be bad? I think he’s saying you should clarify you’re going on a date not a friend hangout if you do think it is a date.
English
1
0
0
175
Strong Chess
Strong Chess@thestrongchess·
I have some questions. I am truly interested in your answers: 1) Are you aware that this post SCREAMS that it was written by AI? 2) Can you at least understand WHY I might think that if you couldn't bother to articulate your own thoughts, you probably didn't form them diligently either? And that if you would, essentially, plagiarize, you likely aren't ethical as a doctor either? Not trying to get you to agree. perhaps you feel this was your thought and that ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini just saved you some time. But do you at least get it? 3) Can you see the irony in defending Ozempic as not a shortcut while...brazenly taking a shortcut? Possibly in a clueless manner? I know I am being a dick here, but please please please answer honestly; I just cannot fathom the psychology of posting such obvious AI slop. Btw, I used to dismiss Ozempic but have since moved far more in your direction. I do see Ozempic body as negative, but can now understand it as a tradeoff for the huge health levers you mention. Maybe you will budge my opinion here!
English
8
0
66
13.6K
Dr Terry Simpson
Dr Terry Simpson@drterrysimpson·
The “Ozempic body” insult is just aesthetic snobbery dressed up as health advice. When someone loses 20–30% of their body weight, blood pressure drops, sleep apnea improves, joints hurt less, and their risk of heart attack falls. If that offends an influencer’s sense of beauty, medicine will somehow survive. And the irony is thick: Saladino rails against “pharmaceutical shortcuts” while selling a cabinet full of supplements that have far less evidence than GLP-1 therapy. Yes — eat real food. Yes — move your body. I recommend the Mediterranean pattern all the time. But pretending obesity is solved by telling people to “eat like your great-grandmother” ignores genetics, metabolism, medications, environment, and decades of clinical research. GLP-1 drugs aren’t a shortcut. They’re the first effective medical treatment for obesity we’ve had in a century.
Paul Saladino, MD@paulsaladinomd

"Ozempic bod" is not attractive or healthy. GLP-1s are a shortcut to nowhere good. Eat like a human (single ingredient foods and foods with ingredients your great grandmother would recognize) and move like a human. This is the way.

English
290
467
5.1K
1.2M
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
@MadelaineLucyH every sentence here is bananas although I don't think it's hardful to think any of it so carry on
English
0
0
0
36
Madelaine Hanson
Madelaine Hanson@MadelaineLucyH·
The smarter you are, the more accomplished, and the more attractive, the smaller your dating pool becomes. That's true for both genders. Also, I know *so* many 35-50 year old men who will refuse you outright for being under 30. It's seen as shameful.
Allie ✞@allie__voss

A 30-year-old pretty doctor is not struggling dating because she's 30 or a doctor Unless she's horrible on first dates, she's most likely just struggling because modern dating is a struggle and takes time That doesn't necessarily mean you're doing anything wrong

English
42
108
3K
227.8K
Karl🇺🇸🇺🇦
Karl🇺🇸🇺🇦@zippkode·
@RadaNotSay That's a great observation Rada — it shows you're really thinking critically about how the problems with new technology emerge. I'm glad I know that — is Alt+0151. Makes this kind of joke a lot faster.
English
1
0
1
49
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
the problem with LLMs is people
English
1
0
3
188
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
This kinda thing isn't wrong and gets said a lot. But I think what's not said as much is while girls should be encouraged to go hard at things, boys need to be encouraged to do "girl-things" that slow girls down that are more about looking out for other people.
Rae tweet media
English
0
1
7
420
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
@catehall Alright but did we really need to RT "Deport Foreign Criminals" account -_-
English
6
0
379
38.1K
Rae
Rae@RadaNotSay·
@zdch @SecWar Idk “defective altruism” is a pretty clever pun for his specific purpose
English
0
0
1
77
Zac Hill
Zac Hill@zdch·
@SecWar This is so cringe and big mad. Why all the strawmen about EA and the lame puns - Anthropic isn’t doing any of that. Also you can’t just denigrate a contract *you* signed as ‘virtue signaling’. Come on now. Listen to Dean Ball instead of bowing to this Boomer Madness.
English
2
1
171
7.2K
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth
This week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States Government or the Pentagon. Our position has never wavered and will never waver: the Department of War must have full, unrestricted access to Anthropic’s models for every LAWFUL purpose in defense of the Republic. Instead, @AnthropicAI and its CEO @DarioAmodei, have chosen duplicity. Cloaked in the sanctimonious rhetoric of “effective altruism,” they have attempted to strong-arm the United States military into submission - a cowardly act of corporate virtue-signaling that places Silicon Valley ideology above American lives. The Terms of Service of Anthropic’s defective altruism will never outweigh the safety, the readiness, or the lives of American troops on the battlefield. Their true objective is unmistakable: to seize veto power over the operational decisions of the United States military. That is unacceptable. As President Trump stated on Truth Social, the Commander-in-Chief and the American people alone will determine the destiny of our armed forces, not unelected tech executives. Anthropic’s stance is fundamentally incompatible with American principles. Their relationship with the United States Armed Forces and the Federal Government has therefore been permanently altered. In conjunction with the President's directive for the Federal Government to cease all use of Anthropic's technology, I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security. Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic. Anthropic will continue to provide the Department of War its services for a period of no more than six months to allow for a seamless transition to a better and more patriotic service. America’s warfighters will never be held hostage by the ideological whims of Big Tech. This decision is final.
English
10.5K
11.1K
71.2K
13.2M