Jennifer Rhea

177 posts

Jennifer Rhea

Jennifer Rhea

@RheaRay30

Bergabung Ocak 2022
2.7K Mengikuti44 Pengikut
Qui-Gon Jim
Qui-Gon Jim@jimbojd4·
Since we hating on Europeans I just wanna add that I absolutely loathe the way British people say “pasta”
English
824
106
3.7K
4.6M
ÉlectroBuck ⚜️
ÉlectroBuck ⚜️@ElectroBuck99·
@VincentGeloso Je suis certain que dans la bible belt, ils seraient ravis que leur poulet est halal.
Terrebonne, Québec 🇨🇦 Français
4
0
2
2.8K
Vincent Geloso
Vincent Geloso@VincentGeloso·
Dans le sud des États-Unis, la réponse à ceci serait: Bless your heart honey but that don’t make me no nevermind
Isabelle Laporte@ilaporte

Poulet Rouge ne vend que du poulet halal. On le découvre sur leur site Internet, dans la section «FAQ». J'aurais voulu que ce soit affiché lorsqu'on passe une commande, mais c'est un sujet à part. (De toute manière, j'en suis à me demander si 100% des volailles et viandes autre que porc ne sont pas certifiées halal, rendant l'étiquetage inutile.) Mais regardez bien la raison invoquée pour l'offre 100% halal : «... être davantage inclusif et de permettre à un maximum de nos clients de pouvoir manger chez nous». Ça, c'est insultant. Comprenez-moi bien : c'est une entreprise privée, et elle vend ce qu'elle veut. Un resto de ce type n'est pas un «service essentiel» comme une épicerie. Aussi, sa décision d’attirer une clientèle plutôt qu’une autre la regarde. Il y a une épicerie halal près de chez moi. Ils s’affichent clairement, c’est un commerce spécialisé, sans controverse. On y entre ou on passe son chemin, comme on veut. L'insulte réside dans le fait de se faire dire que c’est au nom de « l’inclusion » que Poulet Rouge offre un menu 100% halal, c'est-à-dire un menu qui correspond aux désirs et besoins des musulmans (moins de 5% de la population) et des non croyants. Autrement dit, je ne fais pas partie de cette «inclusion». Que Poulet Rouge veuille attirer ou favoriser une clientèle musulmane, soit. Mais je ne peux m'empêcher de me demander si cette motivation insultante, cette petite gifle n'est pas seulement une maladresse marketing, mais un «statement» délibéré. Si vous connaissez d'autres entreprises qui ont motivé (sur leur site web ou par courriel) leur choix de n'offrir que du halal, n'hésitez pas à partager dans les réponses. ________ PS : J'ai fait part de mon opinion au commerce, de manière directe, mais courtoise. PPS : toute grossièreté en mots ou emojis ou propos agressifs ou haineux sous ma publication = blocage.)

Français
8
0
27
8.1K
SocialSense
SocialSense@SocialSenseX·
@RheaRay30 @CoreyWriting This is not a matter of perspectives Jennifer. It is a matter of facts. Your opinion is also noted, though.
English
1
0
1
45
Jennifer Rhea
Jennifer Rhea@RheaRay30·
@SocialSenseX @CoreyWriting Read some South African news papers or some books about it before criticizing his perspective. He’s not wrong. It’s is rife with corruption.
English
1
0
6
51
SocialSense
SocialSense@SocialSenseX·
@CoreyWriting Corey, Corey, Corey... Would it kill you to pick up a book and actually read instead of getting all your facts from CNN and FOX? Can you at least do some research before you assert propaganda so boldly?
English
1
0
11
1.2K
Jennifer Rhea
Jennifer Rhea@RheaRay30·
@dervishconan @Breaking911 This is a very silly comment. Those are clearly not hijabs. She was wearing silk scarves women of her era often wore when outside on windy days to keep her hair from blowing everywhere. Everybody’s grandma did this. It has nothing to do with religious suppression of women.
English
0
0
8
127
Abla عبلة
Abla عبلة@dervishconan·
@Breaking911 So what even the British Queen Elizabeth II wore nice hijab &headscarves. It was part of her style.
Abla عبلة tweet mediaAbla عبلة tweet mediaAbla عبلة tweet mediaAbla عبلة tweet media
English
2
1
78
2.1K
Breaking911
Breaking911@Breaking911·
AOC wore a hijab while joining Zohran Mamdani at a Muslim holiday celebration in New York City today.
English
375
120
665
1.9M
Jennifer Rhea
Jennifer Rhea@RheaRay30·
@RitchieTorres Sharia law is diametrically opposed to freedom of religion. That’s the issue. Once the balance too far in their direction no one will be allowed to practice anything else.
English
1
0
0
287
Jennifer Rhea
Jennifer Rhea@RheaRay30·
@Subhanalla94706 @idicenter One God in 3 persons. And more like humbled Himself, took on our shame, and concurred death, but judging by your vibe truth and virtue aren’t your aim here.
English
1
0
2
40
IDI
IDI@idicenter·
Millions of men and women pressing in suffocating waves around the Kaaba, bodies climbing over bodies, hands clawing toward a single black stone set in silver, lips and foreheads desperate to touch it. What is the origin of that chaos? The Pagan Origins of Islam's Rituals by @DanBurmawy idicenter.org/article/the-pa…
English
18
27
142
271K
Jennifer Rhea
Jennifer Rhea@RheaRay30·
@KonstantinKisin Had to have the audacity to say, “you read that correctly,” when regurgitating false information.
English
0
0
0
251
Konstantin Kisin
Konstantin Kisin@KonstantinKisin·
Very good example of the lies anti-Western activists love to tell: The claim that Britain only paid off slavery compensation in 2015 is false — and the person who spread it has admitted it. The claim that "British taxpayers were paying off slavery compensation until 2015" went viral in 2018 when the UK National Debt Management Office tweeted it. It was retracted almost immediately because it was wrong. The 1835 government loan used to pay slave owner compensation was fully redeemed in 1938. What continued beyond that were small residual government consolidated bonds — routine Victorian-era debt instruments bundled together with hundreds of other government expenditures from the same period, including the Napoleonic Wars and Irish Famine relief. This lie spread because it was emotionally compelling. It was not true. Yes, slavery compensation was paid to the owners because that was the only way to achieve abolition. And yes, abolition was the result of campaigning and technological changes but it nonetheless represents a unique achievement of the West: everywhere else, including the Far East, the Middle East and Africa slavery continued for decades, if not centuries, and into the present time. Note how, as usual, anti-Western narratives deliberately fail to engage in a fair comparison with OTHER empires and civilisations in the world and their conduct during the same time period. I refuse to hold our civilisation to a fake, utopian standard of perfection while letting everyone else off the hook.
Sony Thăng@nxt888

Konstantin, you asked a Black woman where she'd rather live than Britain or America or Canada. Let's take Britain as your example of tolerant, slavery-ending Western excellence. Britain did not end slavery voluntarily. Britain ended the Atlantic slave trade in 1807 after decades of organized abolitionist pressure, slave rebellions across the Caribbean, most consequentially Haiti in 1791, and the growing calculation that wage labor was becoming more economically efficient than chattel slavery in certain contexts. When Britain "abolished" slavery in its colonies in 1833, it paid £20 million in compensation. Not to the enslaved. To the enslavers. The people who had been worked and beaten and raped and bred like livestock for generations received nothing. Their enslavers received the equivalent of £17 billion in today's money, funded by British taxpayers. A debt so large that British citizens were still paying it off in 2015. You read that correctly. British taxpayers were paying off the debt incurred compensating slave owners until 2015. So when you ask a Black woman where she would rather live, the answer she gives, if she says Britain, is not an endorsement of British moral superiority. It is a statement about which available option causes her the least harm. Those are not the same thing. And you know the difference. You just find it more comfortable not to say it.

English
173
1.1K
8.5K
778.2K
Micha Siegel
Micha Siegel@Micha_Siegel·
@BreitbartNews Sounds like a great answer that shows up in a number of religions.
English
2
0
0
24
Breitbart News
Breitbart News@BreitbartNews·
Stephen Colbert, a professed Catholic, says he believes that when we die, "there is some continuance of some kind. But it’s like a dispersion of the self into some other greater being. And I don’t have any other feelings beyond that.” This sounds more like the Gnostic concept of the Pleroma than the Catholic doctrine of Heaven.
English
956
152
2.6K
2.4M
Jennifer Rhea
Jennifer Rhea@RheaRay30·
@DrewPavlou Even better, he’s the descendant of cuban refugees and holocaust survivors.
English
0
0
12
2K
Jennifer Rhea
Jennifer Rhea@RheaRay30·
@TPCarney As an Okie, being unlabeled is better than being labeled Texas, but I’ll have to let everyone around here know we’re no longer part of the Great Plains or the Southwest.
English
1
0
2
554
Tim Carney
Tim Carney@TPCarney·
My daughter has finished her freshman year of college, and on the drive home she created a map of America divided into regions (on the left). Then after feedback she created an upgraded one (on the right). "My only fear is that this is too perfect," she said.
Tim Carney tweet mediaTim Carney tweet media
English
48
4
59
25.1K
Robert Reich
Robert Reich@RBReich·
There are basically 5 ways to accumulate a billion dollars: 1) Profiting from a monopoly 2) Insider-trading 3) Political payoffs 4) Fraud 5) Inheritance Don’t believe the self-made myth.
English
3.3K
2K
7.2K
1.9M
Jennifer Rhea
Jennifer Rhea@RheaRay30·
@REVWUTRUTH This is one of the clearest scriptures in the Bible. What does he suppose it means in context?
English
0
0
1
75
John K. Amanchukwu Sr.
John K. Amanchukwu Sr.@REVWUTRUTH·
Presbyterian pastor (PCUSA) thinks John 14:6 is “clobber, clobber, clobber” and divides people!
English
22
6
39
4.9K
Ben Dreyfuss
Ben Dreyfuss@bendreyfuss·
When I first started at mother jones our first editorial meeting involved fracking and I said “what’s fracking” and they laughed and then explained it to me and a few years later I had read enough that I had become sentient and in a meeting announced “I think fracking is good”
English
53
53
3K
296.3K
injectomorph
injectomorph@Oxandrolonely·
@muscleforlife I love how people pretend that those who endeavor to lose weight are doing so for the first time, even when your "weird trick" has been done on average multiple times, and has an 80 to 90% failure rate long-term.
English
8
4
1.1K
83.7K
Mike Matthews
Mike Matthews@muscleforlife·
DOCTORS HATE THIS ONE WEIRD TRICK: Look up the average caloric intake of someone on Ozempic. Eat that amount. Experience the same calorie deficit. Lose weight.
English
233
107
10.2K
1.1M
Jennifer Rhea
Jennifer Rhea@RheaRay30·
@Okla_Hombre @avidseries All the no counties in this map have like 20 people combined. Also, didn’t realize McDonald’s forces people to eat their food.
English
0
0
5
146
OklaHombre
OklaHombre@Okla_Hombre·
@avidseries Let's overlay a map of health outcomes over it
English
7
0
9
3K
Mikhaila Peterson
Mikhaila Peterson@MikhailaFuller·
I've wanted to have this kind of conversation for a long time. @WesleyLHuff is a New Testament historian who studies ancient manuscripts, and he is exactly the kind of thinker I wish I had found before I became a Christian. The logical part of my brain needed someone who could walk through the evidence without assuming you already believe it. What is the evidence for the resurrection? What was speaking in tongues? Which translation is the most accurate? And more!
English
174
619
5.3K
218K
Carl
Carl@HistoryBoomer·
$12 million is only baby rich. Business class, not private jet. Anna Wintour, who manages the gala, has $50 million, 4x that. Beyoncé has 1 billion, she travels in her BC850 jet, a gift from Jay-Z. Jeff Bezos, the sponsor, has 250 billion. 20,000 x Paulson’s wealth!
Oli London@OliLondonTV

Sarah Paulson wears dollar bill over her eyes to call out the ‘One Percent.’ The actress, who is worth an estimated $12 million, used her outfit to call out the world’s elite while attending the $100,000 per person Met Gala.

English
147
9
112
29.9K