Tomboy3 🦕

4.5K posts

Tomboy3 🦕 banner
Tomboy3 🦕

Tomboy3 🦕

@TomboyThree

'A people that can no longer distinguish between truth and lies cannot distinguish between right and wrong' Hannah Arendt

Bergabung Kasım 2020
297 Mengikuti269 Pengikut
Tomboy3 🦕 me-retweet
Don Keith
Don Keith@RealDonKeith·
🚨M&S manager in Colchester boots woman out for asking where the women’s changing room is. Claims gender neutral areas are “completely safe” for women and girls then tells her to leave. Woke corporations erasing single-sex spaces and women’s comfort. Total madness.
English
655
1.5K
5.1K
374.7K
Tomboy3 🦕 me-retweet
Tomboy3 🦕
Tomboy3 🦕@TomboyThree·
Blocking or muting me doesn't make it true, sweetie. Because a woman who "looks like a man" is biologically female, she has the statutory right to use female-only spaces. Yes, we've the right to challenge anyone we think shouldn't be in that space, but LEGALLY she can be there 🤷🏻‍♀️
Frances 'Cassandra' Coppola@Frances_Coppola

@TomboyThree @Janeno611 I have, and what I said is correct. You will find the relevant statement in paragraph 13.147.

English
0
0
2
33
Frances 'Cassandra' Coppola
Frances 'Cassandra' Coppola@Frances_Coppola·
So ultimately you have no problem with women who don't conform to patriarchal norms of appearance being banned from ALL public toilets. And you dare to call yourself a feminist?
Akua Reindorf KC@akuareindorf

@bindelj 7 I’ll never not find it mystifying that people like Bragg attempt to recharacterise those rights as politically objectionable. Ultimately the only part of this screenshot I can recommend are the last two words.

English
33
20
141
24.1K
Owen Jones
Owen Jones@owenjonesjourno·
If trans women use men’s toilets, they will be subjected to humiliation, abuse and violence. Anyone with any sense knows this. Which is why in practice trans women will not use men’s toilets, and will just increasingly be driven out of society.
BBC Breakfast@BBCBreakfast

Single-sex spaces - such as changing rooms and toilets - must be used on the basis of biological sex, new guidance from the equalities watchdog has confirmed. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

English
4K
450
3.5K
733K
Tomboy3 🦕 me-retweet
Róisín Michaux
Róisín Michaux@RoisinMichaux·
Spot the lie. @Egalite_EU @richard_coxon One of the founders of Egalite, the EU LGBTIQ staff network, was the radical feminist Jo Brew of Women’s Declaration International. It was for same-sex attracted people. It did not include troons and people with salt-wasting CAH.
Róisín Michaux tweet media
English
1
14
58
1.2K
Polly Clark
Polly Clark@MsPollyClark·
@blablafishcakes They kept saying it’s not about toilets but it’s SO about toilets. This leaflet is bizarre.
English
1
5
102
1.6K
Tomboy3 🦕 me-retweet
Róisín Michaux
Róisín Michaux@RoisinMichaux·
At least 12 of the 26 members of the WHO group tasked with developing the new guidelines for the affirmation of trans-identifying people are infectious disease specialists, or work principally in the HIV/AIDS field. The trans phenomenon happened because of AIDS money
English
4
40
135
17K
Tomboy3 🦕 me-retweet
Lisa Mazur
Lisa Mazur@LisaMazurNH·
The main stream news is failing to do their job, so here is the bigger picture on this story out of NH. The man pretending to be a woman hanging out in women and children's private spaces is Christopher Beaulieu. He was previously convicted of felonious sexual assault (victim was a minor). So the thing they say never happens is absolutely happening. He also hangs out at Chuck E Cheese in Manchester. Judy Walcott was getting ready to use the bathroom in the women’s locker room at the Concord Planet Fitness when she saw Christopher hanging up belongings outside a shower. Understandably she was very uncomfortable and scared (I know this feeling because men use our restrooms in the State House too), so she went to the front desk and reported it. The employees ignored it. A few days later, she reported it to another employee who called her “transphobic” and told her to quit if she didn’t like it. A few hours later, the assistant manager called her and canceled the membership. They forged her signature on the cancelation too. This smells like a lawsuit waiting to happen. So a woman was punished for being frightened in her private space, and the man is still hanging out freely in there. @KellyAyotte help! @libsoftiktok
Lisa Mazur tweet mediaLisa Mazur tweet mediaLisa Mazur tweet mediaLisa Mazur tweet media
WMUR TV@WMUR9

A New Hampshire woman said her Planet Fitness membership was canceled after she said she raised concerns about a man being in the women's locker room. Judy Walcott said she is frustrated with how the situation was handled. wmur.com/article/nh-pla…

English
281
1.7K
5.4K
2M
Tomboy3 🦕
Tomboy3 🦕@TomboyThree·
@eliotranch @PankhurstEM Was it their actual defense that they were too stupid to know about consent, or was that the judge's own independently arrived at decision? Either way, why should any of these three brutes be allowed free on our streets if they don't understand "no"?
English
1
1
1
55
Ellie Rofe
Ellie Rofe@eliotranch·
One of the reasons the judge gave such a disgustingly lenient sentence is because these boys were of too low intelligence to understand consent. They lured two different girls to go on a 'date', then raped them and filmed it while laughing and shared it online. But apparently the 'consent' bit was a touch tricky. Judge needs locking up with them.
Daily Mail@DailyMail

Teenage gang who lured schoolgirl, 15, to underpass and laughed as they filmed themselves raping her handed youth rehabilitation orders trib.al/RkAJsUQ

English
182
1.7K
19.5K
894.3K
jjinUK64
jjinUK64@JjinUk64·
Please don't just be angry and outraged. Please take the time to request a Sentencing Review and try to help get these sentences overturned: gov.uk/ask-crown-cour… It will ask you for some case details as you go through the submission, I will put the necessary answers below. It takes less than 5 minutes — we need to do this for the sake of these poor children. Answers needed... Names of the convicted: "Have been withheld from the public. Sentencing Judge is Judge Nicholas Rowland. Date of sentence: "21 / 05 / 2026" and "within the past 28 days" Crown Court where this sentence was issued: "Southampton" Which offence(s) was the sentence given for?: "Rape, and Taking and Possessing Indecent Images" Why do you think the sentence is unduly lenient?: Insert your own answer, and do not use profanity no matter how upset you are. Mine was: The crimes here are violent crimes that have destroyed the lives of the victims, at least one of which is now suicidal and the sentence is not remotely proportional to the severity of the crime. Additionally, the Judge's comments seem to indicate a bias in favour of the convicted, as he offers up justifications for their behaviour such as being low IQ. These crimes were not spontaneous, they were premeditated and planned. They were also filmed. So we know what happened, and we know that they were intelligent enough to plan and execute the luring and entrapment of their victims, which does not indicate that they were the kind of simpletons the Judge suggests. If they had the capacity to plan the crimes in advance, then they have the capacity to be held criminally responsible for those actions.
English
150
633
1.9K
199.7K
Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio
>Gypsy travellers commit premeditated gang rape of a child. >It lasts 90 minutes. >They film the attacks, laugh at the child they're raping, encourage their friends to rape her, mock the child asking “why do you look sad?” >They know they won't be punished so they rape an even younger child at knifepoint, cut her clothes off with knives. >The child victims are left petrified and wanting to die. >Judge praises the gang rapists' behaviour in court. >Judge lets them walk free saying “I should avoid criminalising [the rapists] unnecessarily”. >Gives them "youth rehabilitation orders". >Other gang rapists now know that activist judges have effectively decriminalised the violent gang rape of British children. >None of this is accidental.
Daily Mail@DailyMail

Teenage gang who lured schoolgirl, 15, to underpass and laughed as they filmed themselves raping her handed youth rehabilitation orders trib.al/RkAJsUQ

English
1K
9.1K
44.7K
2.9M
Tomboy3 🦕
Tomboy3 🦕@TomboyThree·
Come on people, take action! Don't just tolerate this daily decriminalisation of rape right under our noses! gov.uk/ask-crown-cour…
jjinUK64@JjinUk64

Please don't just be angry and outraged. Please take the time to request a Sentencing Review and try to help get these sentences overturned: gov.uk/ask-crown-cour… It will ask you for some case details as you go through the submission, I will put the necessary answers below. It takes less than 5 minutes — we need to do this for the sake of these poor children. Answers needed... Names of the convicted: "Have been withheld from the public. Sentencing Judge is Judge Nicholas Rowland. Date of sentence: "21 / 05 / 2026" and "within the past 28 days" Crown Court where this sentence was issued: "Southampton" Which offence(s) was the sentence given for?: "Rape, and Taking and Possessing Indecent Images" Why do you think the sentence is unduly lenient?: Insert your own answer, and do not use profanity no matter how upset you are. Mine was: The crimes here are violent crimes that have destroyed the lives of the victims, at least one of which is now suicidal and the sentence is not remotely proportional to the severity of the crime. Additionally, the Judge's comments seem to indicate a bias in favour of the convicted, as he offers up justifications for their behaviour such as being low IQ. These crimes were not spontaneous, they were premeditated and planned. They were also filmed. So we know what happened, and we know that they were intelligent enough to plan and execute the luring and entrapment of their victims, which does not indicate that they were the kind of simpletons the Judge suggests. If they had the capacity to plan the crimes in advance, then they have the capacity to be held criminally responsible for those actions.

English
0
1
2
19
Tomboy3 🦕
Tomboy3 🦕@TomboyThree·
@NadiaWhittomeMP "The legal situation for trans people is now deeply incoherent". That's because 'being trans' doesn't make sense. Nobody is born in the wrong body.
English
0
0
1
36
Nadia Whittome MP
Nadia Whittome MP@NadiaWhittomeMP·
While it appears that the government has successfully pushed back on some particularly harmful elements in the previous draft, the new Code of Practice will still lead to the exclusion of trans people from services and facilities that they have used without issue for a very long time. This will do nothing to improve women’s lives and the many struggles we face, but it will put trans people (and anyone perceived as trans) at increased risk of discrimination, harassment and violence. The Code unfortunately still represents the culmination of years of anti-trans campaigning from a small, well-funded minority who have had outsized influence in the media and in politics, and have weaponised the courts for their own ends. The legal situation for trans people is now deeply incoherent and means that it is untenable for them to be able live their lives with dignity. This is completely out of line with the values of equality that a Labour government is meant to champion. Instead of making this Code statutory, the government should be legislating to clarify and protect trans people’s rights, privacy and inclusion.
English
1K
297
1.5K
148.4K
Tomboy3 🦕 me-retweet
Jennifer Sey
Jennifer Sey@JenniferSey·
Oh to live on TERF Island — where women’s sports are for women, mothers are female and words have actual meaning!
English
89
559
3.3K
99.5K
Tomboy3 🦕
Tomboy3 🦕@TomboyThree·
@DailyMail I think he'll find out just how BIG this "small minority" is. Twat.
English
0
0
0
4
Daily Mail
Daily Mail@DailyMail·
Andy Burnham said that men who identify as women should be able to use female toilets - and only a 'small minority' object, he claimed trib.al/jpIwYhB
English
1.7K
1.7K
3K
1.7M
Tomboy3 🦕 me-retweet
Frances Lumsden
Frances Lumsden@FrancesLumsden·
I was a tiny 4 year old girl when a ‘drinking friend’ of my father, shoved his penis down my throat. I could not breath, the pain ripped through my body rendering me paralysed. I thought I was going to die. His orgasm, which I came to understand later ( for as a child I had no concept of such a thing) was terrifying, his body shook as he abandoned himself to his pleasure. I remember his smell, his weight, his strength. I remember the pain, the terror, the total lack of understanding of what was happening to me. How can a 4 year old child “consent” to something she does not even understand? I was NOT traumatised by being told I was traumatised. I was traumatised by his violation of my body and mind. For he threatened me into silence. I stayed silent for 50 odds years. But not now. These paeodophile men can attempt to justify their wickedness til the moon turns to dust, they will still be abusers, violators, criminals, worse that any animal. They are self centred bastards, who ruin the lives of children. They should be put in jail in perpetuity. x.com/DutchForce17/s…
English
546
1.8K
10.9K
313.9K