Eliot Ranch

13.8K posts

Eliot Ranch

Eliot Ranch

@eliotranch

Je suis femme. Rational thought and empiricism is the only route to *genuine* compassion. Scepticism is self-care.

the ranchhouse Katılım Ağustos 2023
2K Takip Edilen3.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
I've been meaning to update this for ages. Trans isn't a coherent ideology. Therefore it's not a coherent political identity. There are no rights that trans people don't have. There are no entitlements that can be given - without creating terrible second-order consequences.
Eliot Ranch tweet media
English
28
141
504
45.6K
Eliot Ranch retweetledi
Calum E. Douglas FRAeS
Calum E. Douglas FRAeS@CalumDouglas1·
Slavery began in large form soon after humans first began to settle into collective organized groups large enough to be called what we could call towns (this refers to the number of people involved not the sophistication of the buildings). However scholars state that slaves probably existed in small numbers even before this. This occured absolutely everywhere on earth, later vast numbers were taken by Arabs, where extremely large numbers died as many of them were required for Hareems (Islamic designated areas for Women only) where the males had to be eunuchs so they did not interfere with the Arab women. The Arab slave traders cut off the genitals with knives and the ones still alive once they`d walked over the desert to the ships were taken away. The huge attrition rate was irrelevant as the price paid for Eunuchs was enough to offset those who bled to death in the sand for whom very little had been paid. So they simply took far more than were needed, knowing that the final price was worth it, and was far less effort than looking after those medically who had been mutilated. Some alternatively had their genitals cut off in designated rooms at the ports, and were simply thrown overboard when they died. When Europeans arrived, they didnt even have to travel inland or "take" slaves, as they simply contacted the african warlords who were already selling slaves from local rival tribes, the Europeans were merely the latest buyers to arrive. It is estimated that about 90% of all slaves Europeans removed from Africa, were simply purchased upon arrival there. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_i… The first nations to decide that this was no longer tenable were Iceland and Norway, however these were internal policies with no external effects, more serious measures were taken by Haiti and Denmark, who actually included abolition of the transatlantic trade. Britain began stopping the trade with the The Slave Trade Act of 1807. Later the British Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 represented the FIRST legislative act in the world, which not only began the process of banning the internal use of slaves, AND the trade, but also included active external use of military force to STOP the practise elsewhere. The British expended significant military effort stopping the trade, and then eventually bought the freedom of the slaves in our lands, at immense cost in 1833, the loan was only paid off in 2015. The British nation at the time spent the about 2% GDP for a considerable time on stopping slavery. About three thousand Royal Navy personell were involved in this interdiction effort. It is difficult to make exact figures, but the largest slave users in known history since reasonable records began was the Roman Empire, with about 10 to 15 million slaves at the peak of the empire in captivity, which were mostly white European in origin with countless nationalties, including Britons, Germans, Greeks and Spaniards, some africans were also used. unrv.com/slavery.php The second most prolific users of slaves were Arab/Islamic nations, with about 11 > 18 million slaves in use, spanning well over a thousand years of exploitation. These were taken from Africa, India and Europe, and included many white europeans. soamibooks.com/post/the-islam… The third was the Portuguese Empire, which is estimated to have taken about 6 million slaves from Africa specifically. statista.com/statistics/115… The forth was the British empire which took about 3 million slaves, mostly from Africa over about 170 years. slaveryandremembrance.org/articles/artic… The fifth was the French empire, which took about a million slaves, mostly from Africa. encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/transa… Unlike the Arabian and Islamic nations who used slaves for well over a thousand years, Britain in just 170 years went from using slavery, to banning and then bring the first to militarily enforce this ban internationally. We do not know exactly how many black Africans over time were enslaved by other black Africans for use internally within Africa, but we know it was utterly endemic to the societies there, and was was vast in scope. Estimates range from 25% to 75% of Africans in different parts of Africa for a large period in history existed on some level essentially as slaves to other Africans, although some had better life conditions than others and in some regions could expect after a long period of service to possibly be released. ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/… I hope this leaves you marginally better informed about this terrible period in human history, which, is still very much ongoing in many parts of the world today.
Calum E. Douglas FRAeS tweet media
Kenny Edwards🕊️☘️@KennyEdw

@JohnCleese The Africans and Arabs didn’t industrialise slavery. We shipped slaves from west Africa to the Caribbean & our ships returned home with sugar - the Slave-Sugar Nexus. The slave trade drove the Industrial Revolution in Britain. I’m shocked at just how dumb John Cleese is.

English
47
407
1.2K
49.9K
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
@Hypnotoad_mfer @Docstockk I'd say that's the difference between people who see the world as simple, uncontested ideas and those who see second order consequences.
English
0
0
0
15
Eliot Ranch retweetledi
Dr. Brian L. Cox
Dr. Brian L. Cox@BrianCox_RLTW·
This video is fascinating bc it encapsulates in just 1 clip how & why Islamist propaganda has captured the political left so thoroughly over the years. Grievance & solidarity are the 2 main themes. The evil West has oppressed everyone from native populations to Minab schoolgirls. So many martyrs - all over the world - from then to now, including Qasem Soleimani & Ayatollah Khamenei. And for all these martyrs of Western imperialism? "ONE VENGEANCE FOR ALL". This is the slogan displayed right after the missile launched from Iran destroys the Statue of Liberty all the way over near Manhattan. Though aside from celebrating an actual war crime (unless 🗽 is believed to constitute a military objective?), the statue isn't quite what it seems. In this clip, Lady Liberty has been modified to resemble Ba'al, who is presented as a false god in a passage from the Holy Quran (Surah As-Saffat (37:123–125)). So, throughout the entire video, we see various populations who may be identified as victims of Western hegemony, across the globe, all gazing longingly to the heavens, looking forward to the moment Iran destroys the false idol of Western liberty in the name of ONE VENGEANCE FOR ALL. From a social science perspective, this clip is a masterclass in emotional manipulation by appealing to the social grievances & perpetual sense of victimhood that is a driving force of progressive & liberal sociopolitical identity throughout the West today. As a military lawyer who used to advise on military information support operations (formerly known as psyops), I recognize & even appreciate (and yet denounce) the craft behind the clip. And as a law prof and former judge advocate, I recognize the connection between effects-based #LOAC assessments that are a defining feature of contemporary global humanitarian & civilian "protection" activist movements and visual references to the population in #Gaza + schoolchildren in #Minab. So, those are some reflections on the craft behind the clip. Now let's consider the vector & purpose of this polished piece of Islamist propaganda. It was initially created & posted by Fars News Agency in Iran. But you'll notice it went viral when it was posted by RT (formerly Russia Today), a state-controlled international "news" network funded by the Russian government. For anyone who may not be tracking, RT is sanctioned in 🇺🇸 (& heavily restricted in many other Western countries) for engaging "in operations, covert influence, and military procurement" (pic 1). But, that doesn't stop an incredibly active presence here @X, for better or for worse. So, what we have is a video produced by a literal enemy currently engaged in active hostilities against 🇺🇸, posted by a state-owned "news" agency of a major geopolitical rival, and amplified across the web by Iran's useful idiots all throughout the West. By now, you've probably picked up on the common thread. All 3 camps - Islamists, geopolitical rivals, and progressives - share the same goal: the collapse of Western society as it exists today. Islamists pursue that goal because the West is an insurmountable impediment to establishing a global caliphate. Other geopolitical competitors align with sympathetic partisans throughout the West because they know the West can't be defeated by diplomatic, economic, and military means alone...so stoking social unrest can encourage collapse from within. And Iran's useful idiots on the left want to replace existing political structures with their preferred vision of a socialist utopia. Here's the thing: our external enemies are watching & learning, and in many ways they know us even better than we know ourselves. They're playing the long game. And judging from the circulation of this video & many thousands upon thousands of similar specimens of Islamist/adversarial/progressive propaganda that get pushed throughout the West every month, it's not a foregone conclusion that they will eventually lose in the end. #AgainstAllEnemies
Dr. Brian L. Cox tweet media
.@LBGamestips

Iran 🇮🇷 just released this emotional video I don’t think they are stopping until all their objectives have been met

English
5
44
123
4.3K
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
@paulkhammond @TheGhostSleepi1 He doesn't have a message. But the Green Party has absolutely locked into Gen-Z coded vibes. Their comms are good. They're just message-free and their plans would destroy the country.
English
0
0
0
50
Paul Hammond
Paul Hammond@paulkhammond·
@TheGhostSleepi1 His message resonates with the youth and cuts across working class racial boundaries.
English
5
0
62
887
William Clouston SDP
William Clouston SDP@WilliamClouston·
As I predicted some time ago, Ed Miliband will be our next PM. The pitch is being rolled with tripe like this from Gaby Hinsliff: ‘Miliband is the cabinet’s resident deep thinker at a time when big ideas are suddenly back’ theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
English
511
209
924
51.3K
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
@maccadoo8 Women shouldn't be punched in the face by men for sport. Shouldn't be remotely controversial!
English
0
2
42
398
LoulouD
LoulouD@maccadoo8·
4 people unfollowed me since I posted about the IOC ruling. I do not care! I will stand for the rights of Women & girls, my daughter, neices, sisters in law & every Woman I know, those I will never know, now & for as long as I live. Always!❤ We won a battle, the war still rages.
English
160
124
1.9K
59.8K
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
You've added a lot of bad-faith interpretation there. But I'll answer in good faith despite that. Criticising a religion and the behaviour of its adherents is not racist. Otherwise, Ricky Gervais was terribly racist towards the Pope throughout the 2000s and 2010s. Do you see how utterly ridiculous that framing is? Mothin Ali celebrated terrorism on 7th Oct, hounded a rabbi into hiding and keeps his wife in a misogynistic bin bag. His behaviours and beliefs, not his identity, are what bothers me.
English
0
0
2
85
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
@RabbiPoupko @18urbanwarrior He has a massive, expensively-dressed entourage for a supposed revolutionary freedom fighter. This movement is about as grassroots as astroturf.
English
0
0
1
49
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
These organisations appear to consist entirely of: 1. People who are on the regime's side 2. People who think so little of non-Westerners that they can't even use our moral framework around 'war crimes' for them Neither of these groups should be running the media.
CAMERA@CAMERA4Truth

A new CAMERA analysis found @bbc, @cnn, @nbc and @nytimes used the phrase "war crime" 32 times in the first three weeks of the U.S./Israel-Iran war. 88% of those applications were directed solely toward the actions of the United States and/or Israel. Zero were directed solely toward the actions of the Islamic Republic of Iran. "The disproportionate application of the phrase stands in contrast with reality," writes @dmlitman. "Of the over 400 ballistic missiles fired at Israel, it is estimated that half of them were cluster munitions which drop dozens of submunitions over a wide radius of five miles. As of Mar. 22, at least two dozen of these missiles have hit populated areas, 'with over 100 separate impact sites.' While cluster munitions are not universally banned, using them to target populated areas almost certainly constitutes a war crime."

English
0
0
1
48
Eliot Ranch retweetledi
Adam Mossoff
Adam Mossoff@AdamMossoff·
Data analytics confirm huge bias in favor of pro-Islamic regime of Iran by BBC, CNN, NBC and NY Times. These media orgs used "war crime" 32 times in news reports in the first 3 weeks of the U.S./Israel-Iran war. ZERO references solely to crimes by Islamic regime, and 88% media uses referred solely to U.S. or Israel. Islamic regime uses cluster bombs against Israeli civilians, shoots missiles and suicide drones at civilian targets in numerous Arab countries not involved in war, fires missiles at holy sites in Old Jerusalem, etc., etc. ZERO identification of these war crimes as standalone crimes by major Western media organizations. This is shameful.
CAMERA@CAMERA4Truth

A new CAMERA analysis found @bbc, @cnn, @nbc and @nytimes used the phrase "war crime" 32 times in the first three weeks of the U.S./Israel-Iran war. 88% of those applications were directed solely toward the actions of the United States and/or Israel. Zero were directed solely toward the actions of the Islamic Republic of Iran. "The disproportionate application of the phrase stands in contrast with reality," writes @dmlitman. "Of the over 400 ballistic missiles fired at Israel, it is estimated that half of them were cluster munitions which drop dozens of submunitions over a wide radius of five miles. As of Mar. 22, at least two dozen of these missiles have hit populated areas, 'with over 100 separate impact sites.' While cluster munitions are not universally banned, using them to target populated areas almost certainly constitutes a war crime."

English
219
1.4K
4K
238.5K
Eliot Ranch retweetledi
Max K
Max K@MaxE2review·
Footage from Mosques all across UK. Quotes: ‘Oh Allah! Curse the infidels and the polytheists…tear apart their unity and ruin their houses.’ ‘Oh Muslim, the stones will say ‘behind me there’s a yahoodi (Jew), come and kill him.’ ‘Oh god kill them (the Jews and the ‘enemies of Islam’) indiscriminately and do not leave any of them alive.’ Note at no point does anyone in the various audiences raise any objections. This is by far the most widespread and most dangerous form of bigotry and intolerance in Western societies at present. And it’s been imported, and allowed to rapidly spread, by ‘liberal’/mainstream politicians and activists who build their careers by vilifying anyone who mentions it’s a problem as an Islamophobe and a racist. And who respond to each brutal jihadist atrocity by obfuscating, claiming that atrocity had nothing to do with Islam, forcing the focus onto ‘hate’ (by which they mean, anyone who’s disgusted by this Islamist lunacy), and introducing laws to censor frank discussion of the religious underpinnings of the threat. Truly suicidal.
English
39
251
620
13.7K
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
@BradfemlyWalsh But yes - I'd imagine there could well have been psychological pressure once the organs were promised to others (even if only in hospital administration terms).
English
0
0
1
7
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
@BradfemlyWalsh This story is utterly tragic and macabre, so I'm not denying your general point. But those are US costs according to the figure title. Not sure what the Spanish equivalent is but I suspect it's nothing like as much, nor for profit.
English
1
0
1
25
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
@DennisCromptom @Docstockk I agree on that basis, but I don't think purist advocates for assisted dying see it as anything but someone's choice.
English
0
0
1
85
Paradroid B.Pie
Paradroid B.Pie@BananaInYourPie·
@eliotranch Hehehe. Remember, kids will go "Yes! Push me down this massive hill! I want it". It only vaguely tapers off with age .-)
English
2
0
1
17
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
I think what's most hilarious about these diatribes - beyond the total false equivalence and bad faith - is that they are so utterly convinced they've seen beyond the veil that mere mortals haven't. But who does he think pushed mass immigration so hard? Here's a hint: people who wanted cheap labour, people who wanted to spend money they couldn't borrow without inflating GDP, and people who wanted voting blocks. In other words: billionaires and elites. He's evidencing the very thing he thinks he's decrying. The smugness is just the cherry on top.
Sam@SamCKx

I can no longer hold my tongue seeing the utter lies being spread about Britain, our history of migration, and how this country was built into what it is today. For those so deeply buried in fake news, manufactured outrage and billionaire‑funded propaganda, I’m going to lay out the truth – and exactly why you’re being fed all this poison. Britain was never a sealed white island. From Roman times there were African soldiers stationed on Hadrian’s Wall and living in British towns, people from across the empire walking these roads nearly 2,000 years ago. Through the Middle Ages and Tudor England you still find Black people in the records – sailors, craftsmen, servants, musicians – even Black musicians at the royal court and Africans being baptised, marrying and being buried in English parishes like anyone else. This isn’t some modern experiment; it’s older than half the castles people visit on their bank‑holiday tours. As Britain went out into the world, the world came here. Sailors and traders from India, Yemen and beyond were arriving in British ports from the 1600s. Some of those men were practising a new faith to most Britons at the time, praying quietly in boarding houses near the docks while they worked brutal shifts in the engine rooms of British ships. Over the centuries, more people from North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia passed through and settled, bringing their languages, foods and beliefs into port cities that were far more mixed than today’s nostalgia merchants like to admit. After two world wars, the truth is simple: this country asked the Commonwealth to come and rebuild it. People from the Caribbean, Africa and South Asia didn’t sneak in; they were recruited. They came to drive buses and trains, staff the NHS, work in mills and foundries, clean offices, run corner shops, open takeaways and small businesses, and yes, build prayer spaces and community centres alongside churches and temples in the neighbourhoods everyone now pretends were always “traditional” and “unchanged”. They did the work that kept Britain going while being told to go home, refused housing, and treated as permanent outsiders. And what have they been paid back with? Scandals where people who’ve lived, worked and paid taxes here for decades get told they don’t belong. Policies designed to make life so hostile that some give up and leave. A media that uses their names, accents, clothes or places of worship as props in endless scare stories. The message is always the same: you might toil for this country, but you will never fully be of it. So when you hear that “Britain was white until recently” or that the country has been “overrun”, understand that you don’t arrive at that belief by accident. You get there because your history has been deliberately ripped out and replaced with a comforting myth: that “real” Britain is white, homogenous, and constantly under siege from people who look, speak or pray differently. Now look at when this myth has been turned up to max volume. Wages frozen. Housing a sick joke. Energy and food prices out of control. Public services hacked to pieces. At the same time, the number of people hoarding unimaginable wealth at the top has exploded. Funny, isn’t it, how every front page is about boats and “swarms” and “our culture”, and almost never about the landlords, hedge funds, private equity and offshore trusts quietly buying up your city and your future. That’s because this isn’t just prejudice; it’s a strategy. If you’re sitting on a mountain of wealth, the last thing you want is ordinary people – of every colour and background – realising they have the same problems and the same enemy. Much safer if the factory worker is furious at the new family down the road. Much safer if the person who can’t see a doctor blames the nurse with an accent instead of the minister who cut the funding. Much safer if a man who can’t afford his rent spends his rage on the woman in a headscarf at the bus stop instead of the billionaire who owns half his city. Racist rhetoric, religious dog‑whistling, all of it, exists to break solidarity. It turns neighbours into enemies and stops people seeing that Black, brown and white working‑class communities have far more in common with each other than any of them will ever have with the people flying in on private jets. It keeps you so busy policing skin colour, passports and prayer mats that you never get round to asking why your kids can’t afford a home, why your parents can’t get a hospital bed, why you’re working harder and standing still. The real story of Britain is this: a crossroads, not a fortress. Africans on Hadrian’s Wall. Black people in Tudor courts and city streets. Sailors, traders and workers from South Asia, the Middle East and beyond in the ports. Caribbean, African and Asian workers rebuilding the country after the war, staffing surgeries and hospitals, driving cabs, running shops, cooking food, teaching kids. Today’s multi‑ethnic, multi‑faith working class is not a glitch; it is Britain. It built this place and it keeps it running. If you’re genuinely angry about what’s happening to this country, good. You should be. But aim it where it belongs. Britain was never pure, never untouched, never “theirs” to take back. The people ruining your standard of living are not the ones risking their lives to get here, or the ones whose names you struggle to pronounce. They’re the ones buying politicians, owning media outlets, writing the story of this country so you never learn your own – and never realise who is standing beside you.

English
2
1
15
302
Eliot Ranch
Eliot Ranch@eliotranch·
It's an ongoing travesty that so many mainstream media organisations have just flat refused to listen to this woman, or the many others who have left Islam or are trying to reform it. They spend their lives hunted and threatened while our cosseted media class fawn over the ideology that threatens them and refuses to even consider their side of the story.
Krisztina Maria@KrisztinaMaria

Ayaan Hirsi Ali - let’s talk a bit about her. She is one of the most courageous voices of our time. She was born in 1969 in Mogadishu, Somalia, into a strict Muslim family. As a young girl, she was subjected to female genital mutilation. She grew up between Saudi Arabia, Ethiopia, and Kenya under a strict Islamic upbringing. In 1992, she fled to the Netherlands to escape an arranged marriage - she jumped off a train in Europe and applied for asylum. There, she learned Dutch, earned a degree in political science, and began working with integration. She lost her faith in Islam. She became an atheist, and later converted to Christianity in 2023. She saw clearly how Islam oppresses women - forced marriages, honor killings, female genital mutilation, polygamy, and the total lack of freedom. In 2004, she made the short film Submission together with Theo van Gogh. The film showed violence against women in Islam. Shortly after, Theo van Gogh was murdered in broad daylight in Amsterdam by a radical Muslim. A threat against Ayaan was left pinned to his chest: she was next. She received death threats for years. She had to live under police protection. She was elected to the Dutch parliament for the Liberal Party, where she fought for Muslim women’s rights and against the illusions of multiculturalism. She has written books such as Infidel, Nomad, and Heretic, where she directly criticizes the core of Islam - not just “extremism,” but the ideology itself. Today, she lives in the United States, married to historian Niall Ferguson, and continues her work, among other things through her foundation (AHA Foundation). She warns the West about mass immigration from Muslim countries, parallel societies, and the self-deception that claims Islam can be reformed without confronting its texts and history. Like Salman Rushdie, Ayaan Hirsi Ali has paid a high price for speaking the truth. Rushdie was hunted for a book. She was hunted for showing the reality of her own life and the lives of millions of Muslim women. She is not “Islamophobic.” She is a former Muslim who has seen the system from the inside and refuses to stay silent. She points to the uncomfortable truth: that Western values such as freedom of speech, gender equality, and individual liberty are incompatible with classical sharia Islam. Ayaan Hirsi Ali is a living example of why the Enlightenment is still worth defending. She risked her life to say what most people don’t dare: that the problem is not only “extremists,” but a religion that, at its core, oppresses women and rejects criticism. She deserves respect from all of us - not because she is “controversial,” but because she refuses to lie in order to be politically correct. In a time where many bow to threats, she continues to speak the truth. These are the kind of people who keep the soul of the West alive. Thank you Ayaan.❤️‍🔥🪽✝️

English
1
6
14
238