Ace
421 posts

Ace
@acedroid96
Software Engineer by trade. But I'm interested in most everything else.
United States Bergabung Ocak 2026
52 Mengikuti22 Pengikut

@EliAfriatISR This, to me, is the only logical explanation that makes sense.
English

@Scoobs9563 @DavidMKeyes Who wanted regime change? Trump came in there to decimate their nuclear program
English

@DavidMKeyes You forgot to mention they have no military and no money. A fanatical leadership cannot operate without money. All they have are hollow threats.
English

Twice as many MAGA Republicans favor regime change in Iran than those who want a negotiated settlement: poll trib.al/g4961rr

English

This is the face of a man with integrity.
He may look defeated, and understandably so. The deal that was reached and signed is 1,000% something Marco Rubio would never support if he were the one in charge.
But he is also a patriot. He respects the administration. He understands the chain of command.
Hang in there, Marco.
In a couple of years, you may get your chance.

English

@VividProwess It's not like Iran still outnumber Israeli missiles. Now if Iran stockpiles so much missiles that it becomes a threat that's another story. But given Iran's current state, there's nothing to worry. Countries in the region should just keep them in line from here on.
English

@RepDonBacon So you don't want Iran to reconstruct after the war? How will their people live after the war?
Again the money is contingent on Iran's actions. My hope is the people will eventually rise up and get rid of their weakened regime.
English

Promising $300B to Iran for reconstruction is a non-starter. The Iranian regime is the world’s #1 exporter of terrorism. It killed over a 1000 Americans. Iran gets 0.
English

@VoicesUnheard Iran can no longer threat the region with nuclear weapons.
Also, Arab Nations are stronger and united than ever allying with Trump. If you're not aware of this, perhaps rethink where you're sourcing your news.
English

Unpopular opinion on this Iran "deal"
We blew up billions in taxpayer money, lost American lives, destroyed equipment (jackpot for the war profiteers), wrecked alliances across the Middle East, spiked gas prices for regular families, and fueled even more inflation.
And what did we accomplish? Absolutely nothing.
The Strait is reopening (it was open before this war started) we're unlocking a $300+ billion fund for them… and now the neocons are throwing a tantrum because Trump showed a shred of restraint.
More innocent people are going to die for what? This endless, pointless theater?
All the world's a stage, and the American people are always the ones footing the bill.
What am I missing?
English

@bungarsargon At the end of WWI, the Versailles treaty enforced tough sanctions against Germany that resulted in severe financial strain and political instability. This instability also resulted in Hitler and the Nazi party rising into power.
Iran is already crippled, let's not make it worse.
English

@JohnnyHudSF @bungarsargon Clearly you haven't been paying attention, then.
English

@nicrypto If Iran can function like a normal country and not a country of lunacy, this makes sense to me.
I see the argument from others where Iran as a country is crippled to oblivion. Fine, but there is no profit in that. Trump I think sees the potential opportunity here.
English

@JohnnyHudSF @bungarsargon A prosperous Iran (not the IRGC version) benefits everyone in the region. But it will only get to that point if the IRGC behaves or maybe just exile themselves. Iran is in shambles now, and is not a threat if status quo remains as is now
English

@JohnnyHudSF @bungarsargon No one is invading Iran. There's no profit in that, and Trump always prioritizes America first. It's why he opened the option for other countries to invest in Iran so everyone can profit. The only one who should be "invading" Iran are it's people to take it back ...
English

@JohnnyHudSF @bungarsargon .... they don't fund their proxies or rebuild their nuclear ambitions, which I'm sure the US will be watching them like a hawk.
That's how I see it happening. But it's contingent on Irans actions. Let see what they do.
English

@JohnnyHudSF @bungarsargon So the only way they get "paid" is when they sell their oil to their clients. It will not come from the 300b fund. Besides that fund is an investment fund, should the other countries choose to do so.
As for how they use their money, they can do whatever they want as long as ...
English

@seanhannity I honestly think Trump is toeing the line because of the upcoming midterms. Not sure he's comfortable having gas prices high before the election. I suspect Trump will go beast mode after the midterms if Iran doesn't behave (which we all know will happen)
English

Victor Davis Hanson says the biggest test now is enforcement, arguing any Iranian violation must be met with an overwhelming response to keep the regime in check:
“The two chief issues I’m not as worried about. I think we know where the enriched uranium is. It’s sealed. We have great intelligence. We can bomb it again if necessary, and we can strike more of their industrial complexes if they cheat. And they will open the Strait of Hormuz because they’re nearly broke. The other concerns are the known unknowns. It’s going to be more difficult to ensure they’re not funding Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Hamas. That’s much murkier. We also don’t know exactly what they’re going to do in Lebanon. But the one thing that must remain ironclad is this: any time they violate the agreement, the response has to be decisive and disproportionate.”
English

@JohnnyHudSF @bungarsargon The 300b is condition based, so let's put that aside.
About the selling of oil, so the fear is they use the money to fund their proxies instead of reconstruction? If so that would qualify as misbehavior if they get caught. If the IRGC is stupid enough to do this, then bombs away
English

@acedroid96 @bungarsargon They get to sell their oil on the worldwide market for the first time in decades plus 300b.
English

@SenateGOP Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall a bill being passed in Congress whereby if another shutdown happens that Congress will not get paid? Or did that not pass? Pretty sure they won't shutdown again if they won't get paid
English

@BryanLeibFL Relax. It's an MOU while they finalize the real deal in 60 days. Have you not been paying attention?
English

If this picture makes you happy then sorry, we are not the same.
I'm a day one Trump supporter. I have never wavered.
I've been on the Iran portfolio for the better part of a decade. These people cannot be trusted. They are the very definition of evil.
I can't believe this day has arrived where we are lifting oil sanctions and unfreezing billions hoping they change their behavior just months after these monsters killed +40,000 of their own unarmed people in cold blood.
To my Iranian brothers and sisters - I am speechless but now I know how the Holocaust happened. The world knew Jews were being slaughtered but everyone looked the other way. Now the world is not just looking away, they are rewarding the Regime's war crimes.

English








