Layer 23

3.3K posts

Layer 23

Layer 23

@layer2323

Providing info on Ordinals. Theorizing on Digital Matters

Bergabung Mart 2021
1.1K Mengikuti3.3K Pengikut
Joe 🟠
Joe 🟠@JoeOrdinals·
fine scribbles of the day
Joe 🟠 tweet media
English
22
37
136
2K
Layer 23
Layer 23@layer2323·
@gumsays This is… painful to observe
English
0
0
0
1.7K
gum
gum@gumsays·
Biggest fumble in History > owns the Bitcoin handle > does nothing but post price & retarded ai memes > pivots to weather posting? What the hell man
English
181
167
12.5K
2.1M
Layer 23
Layer 23@layer2323·
The same resignation exists with giving up on ownership of data, online privacy & true self custody. The dev team that made the $NAT launch & miner redirect possible is also solving these on its fully p2p L1 @TracNetwork. $TNK
Rosc@MrRosc

When you scroll through X these days, beyond the usual crypto-panic, you start noticing something else - a kind of quiet resignation and inertia. A collective “whatever happens, happens.”⬇️ Same with the hashrate drop. “It’s just evolution, don’t interfere. The market will sort everything out.” “Miners migrating to AI? - No big deal.” “Fewer independent miners? - They weren’t moving the needle anyway. - Real decentralisation is about geography, not small miners.” “51% attack? - Who would even do that?” “Miners selling BTC because AI is more profitable? - We’ll sit through a year of bear market, everything will fix itself.” “And when you remind them that Michael Saylor’s fund is now a systemic factor -one that could trigger a domino-style panic sell if the price collapses hard? - Highly unlikely!” You can’t break through🤯 I’m mainly talking about the thought leaders who fundamentally don’t believe the security budget problem even exists. These people don’t change their minds easily. It’s a fixed worldview supported by a loyal audience. You’re not going to move that structure. But even they can’t deny that the $NAT concept improves outcomes under any negative scenario for Bitcoin. It softens shocks, reduces volatility, and makes the transition into a “new economic reality” smoother and less disruptive. p.s. This post was written as a narrative specifically for those in the Bitcoin community who refuse to acknowledge the scale of the security-budget issue. Deliberately shifting the framing away from “$NAT as a fundamental fix” toward an adaptation model - one where $NAT makes the inevitable transition far less destructive.

English
1
3
45
1.1K
Trac Network
Trac Network@TracNetwork·
$TNK Upgrade Update: 1363 wallets claimed total of 15.6M TNK, to be distributed today (10am-12pm UTC) The resubmission process resulted in 420 wallets failing to provide a Trac address So from 16th November, a 7-day overtime period will be made available for them to claim $TNK
English
26
23
126
8.4K
Layer 23
Layer 23@layer2323·
Recent Doom demo a small taste of what’s coming on @TracNetwork with Hypermall already shown on a Steam Deck months ago. “Creators self-custodially distributing games via p2p directories. No middlemen. No need for subscriptions.” App3 gaming on Trac Network. $TNK is coming.
Trac Network@TracNetwork

$TAP, $DOG & $USDT on @steam Deck Run any Trac Network app on your device of choice, Self-custodially. This is App3. We already have Hypermall.io running flawlessly on Steam Decks, so come and build the future of your industry on Trac. Docs: docs.trac.network

English
1
0
2
225
TheHawk
TheHawk@PackBagPoints·
I can't believe I have 3 computers just dedicated right now to mining a Cardano token... Why is this happening?
GIF
English
14
4
16
1.5K
Layer 23
Layer 23@layer2323·
@TheCryptoLark Introduced by the leader of the minor UDR party which holds 16 out of 577 in the Assembly. Nice headline but not a serious shot of coming to fruition.
English
0
0
1
38
Lark Davis
Lark Davis@LarkDavis·
HOLY SHIT!! France is considering a bill to accumulate 2% of Bitcoin's total supply. The bill proposes the acquisition of 420,000 $BTC over the next 7-8 years and using hydro power to mine Bitcoin.
Lark Davis tweet mediaLark Davis tweet media
English
208
189
1.3K
77.6K
Layer 23
Layer 23@layer2323·
Good post by @cobie, but also don’t forget when he did this
Layer 23 tweet media
Cobie@cobie

When ppl claim this I always wonder how they think it happens, or have unrealistic expectations on how much $1bn actually is. I joined crypto with $200. If I held my initial bitcoin since then and never traded, I would have ~$300k. If, instead, from that moment I sold the top and bought the bottom of every crypto cycle on Bitcoin, and never paid any taxes, I would have ~$6m USD. If I put my entire net worth into the Ethereum ICO and never touched it, today I would have ~$150m pre-tax. While it was definitely possible to have made >$1bn with the opportunities in the market, these versions of reality would also require me to make no mistakes, and have no need to spend $ in real life, or take excessive risk via leverage. In reality, I grew up in a working class family. I didn’t have a trust fund and I had to pay off my student loan myself. I had a job at Tescos while at high school. After university, I needed to pay rent and fund cost of living and eventually buy a place to live. I worked at startups for relatively little $ salary, and while a couple have done okay, they still are illiquid and worth nothing until some exit. Perhaps if I erase a couple of dumb mistakes and drawdowns, or if I had a lil more grind, then my answer would be different today. But it is easy to say this with perfect hindsight vision. It’s easy to see where you could have optimised better, and decisions you made look dumb when the past makes things so obvious. The truth is I have always optimised for enjoying my life and not going to 0. I never felt like I had a safety net, so it was never possible for me to do anything in any other way. I would probably have less money if I had tried to add more risk or chased $ harder, because being all-in with your entire livelihood is a mental battle and I feel I only win that battle when the stakes are lower. In writing this, maybe I do understand why CT folks believe this, because modern CT sees crypto as a late-stage lottery ticket farm, where the optimal strategy is to 5x leverage up your portfolio in a hope of catching a good 20% move and then leaving. Or, literally going all-in on the next coin they heard Ansem is buying. So perhaps to them, looking back at the charts, of course that’s what successful folks did. In reality, I use leverage close to never (and typically to reduce risk rather than add risk — have used it to add risk maybe 3 times in the last 5 years, and maybe 15 times ever). I never go all-in on anything, have only ever done that on BTC and ETH before in the last decade. When I buy other things, I limit risk to tiny amounts, because I treat it as a 0 until proven otherwise (so, always <1% liquid portfolio). Liquid portfolio is also a smaller % of overall portfolio to future-proof against my own fuckups. Obviously I made a lot of money, I have been here 12 years! CT doesn’t want to hear about “getting rich in a decade” though. I am happy with where I am and have never really cared or optimised for maximising $ earnings, but instead having a nice life that lets me enjoy the game we play together.

English
0
0
1
297
Layer 23
Layer 23@layer2323·
GIF
ZXX
0
0
0
240