Mohanakrishnan

எல்லா அபத்தங்களையும் தவறுகளையும் கண்டிக்காமல் விட்டுவிட்டாலும் எந்தவொரு அபத்தத்தையும் நியாயப்படுத்திவிடக்கூடாது என்பதில் மிகவும் கவனமாக இருக்கிறேன்

Gadkari's devotion to his family's bank balance is the most steadfast thing in this unpredictable country.

@Normal0sborn My point x.com/mokrish/status…

@mokrish இதில் ஒருவர் மட்டுமே தமிழ் சமூகத்துக்கு வாக்குறுதிகள் கொடுத்து, இன்று அவர் அளித்த அனைத்து உறுதிகளுக்கும் எதிரில் நிற்கிறார்.

இளையராஜா மோடியை மேடையில் புகழும்போது வராத வருத்தமும் ஆதங்கமும் கோபமும் கமல் திமுக மேடையில் பேசும்போது மட்டும் வருவது ஏன்?

@dagalti Your point that Raja kept his political views to himself isn't entirely true. He has praised Modi on several occasions. Also as MP, he abstained / voted mostly aligning with BJP. Anyway I have already made it clear that it is not about Raja or Kamal

@mokrish That’s a better comparison as opposed to invoking Raja (who was very much bashed and not let down lightly at all) when it’s not like Raja campaigned for any party like this

@dagalti My point is not about Raja or Kamal’s politics. It is about the politics of the people trolling Kamal. I strongly believe கமல் அதிமுக ஆதரவு நிலை எடுத்திருந்தால் சார்ந்தோருக்கு இவ்வளவு கோபம் வந்திருக்காது.

@mokrish வெற்றிடத்தை நிரப்ப கட்சி ஆரம்பிக்குறேன் ஊழலை எதிர்க்கற அறச்சீற்றத்துல டிவியை உடைக்கிறேன் ஸ்டாலினை கேவலப்படுத்த அவர் கலைஞர் மகன்னு சொன்னாலே போதும் அப்படின்னுலாம் சொல்லிட்டு தலைவன் இருக்கிறான்னுலாம் பாட்டு பாடுறது இவர் தானுங்களே

@Aunindyo2023 Bumper Sticker Generation

Justice Sharma has clearly not understood the law on recusal of judges from a case. A case for recusal is made out if the circumstances are such that the litigant would have a reasonable apprehension of bias. Actual bias doesn’t need to be shown. Many facts of this case would create a reasonable apprehension of bias in the mind of Kejriwal

Oh, a not so open secret in TN now: the court you may run to for staying fraudent processes, will ask you to pay 40-50% and then fight! Absolute nightmare.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma is not biased. She herself heard the case of bias implied against Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma and defended Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma and then came to the conclusion that Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma is not biased

Why should we increase the number of Loksabha seats? Argument is this will protect male incumbents & ensure they don’t lose their constituency. Where will the additional seats come from? Will have to be carved out of the same area covered by the current 543 seats, right?

👏🏻👏🏻😂😂

Modi appeared on TV and announced that some bill was defeated. But this @ANI is sharing videos of Modi celebrating passage of the same bill. This must be investigated youtu.be/S7ODNLxWMr0?si…

@sujays சின்ன தம்பி says Hi

If there is an award for the stupidest popular movie in Tamil, this one is the GOAT.. ps: Ranjith was method acting so much that he hasn’t come out of character yet

Formally lodged a complaint with the @ECISVEEP Election Commission of India regarding an alleged violation of the Model Code of Conduct during the Prime Minister’s national address on 18 April 2026. Using official government platforms during the MCC period for partisan political remarks raises serious concerns about free and fair elections. I urge the @SpokespersonECI to take immediate cognizance and initiate an inquiry. #ElectionCommission #MCC #FreeAndFairElections

Truly diabolical and abominable spin, hoodwinking the election commission (from which people don't expect anything, anyway - gone case), and all the people of this country that BJP presumes to be completely brainless fools.

தன் முயற்சியில் சற்றும் மனம் தளராத விக்.. ஸாரி வேதாளம் மீண்டும் ஒரு பொய்யை…

@JP_LOKSATTA @KSYashaswini /In a stunning act of self-denial, the NDA government came forward to freeze the current share of States based on the 1971 census data./ This is NOT true. Can you share your source?

Now that the 131st Amendment Bill failed, allocation of Lok Sabha seats will be based on 2026 census data. As per current estimates, seven States will likely lose 35 seats: AP (-5), Telangana (-3), TN (-10), Karnataka (-2), Kerala (-7), Odisha (-4), and WB (-4). Four States will likely gain 34 seats: UP (+12), Bihar (+10), MP (+5), and Rajasthan (+7). BJP is widely believed to be the potential beneficiary of redistribution of seats to States based on 2026 population. In a stunning act of self-denial, the NDA government came forward to freeze the current share of States based on the 1971 census data. There could be many reasons for BJP committing to such a freeze - putting the nation above the party, paving the way for expanding their footprint in the South, or avoiding a divisive issue when the nation has to focus on growth and prosperity in the face of global challenges. Whatever be the motivation of BJP, the seven States that lost share of population are offered an unexpected gift. You don't look a gift horse in the mouth! Surprisingly, the parties which have great stakes in the South and East have scored a spectacular self goal. This is a classic case of cutting the nose to spite the face. In 2001, as the freeze in seats was expiring, I was deeply involved in persuading the then Vajpayee government to continue the freeze in the number of seats allocated to States for another 25 years. An unwieldy coalition and the economic challenge posed by external sanctions after the Pokharan explosion demanded national unity, and the parties responded with the 84th Amendment. Now again a priceless opportunity arose, and the Opposition squandered it without any strategic thinking. If political animosity makes you oblivious of your own interest, or larger interests of fostering unity and focusing on growth and harmony, it is a sign of dysfunctional politics. I appeal to all parties to come together and find a harmonious solution to the thorny problem of seats allocation in the face of demographic imbalances. National unity and our quest for opportunity and prosperity for all demand a fair and swift resolution. In the long run migration will resolve the imbalances. Already millions of migrant workers are building and sustaining the economies of several States in the South, West and North. That is why, despite low fertility rate, Maharashtra's share of the population is increasing. In the US, dramatic internal migration changed the demography and representation over the years. People move freely to States where there is growth and jobs are created. In a century, Florida increased its representation in the US Congress from 4 to 28, California from 11 to 52, Texas from 18 to 38, and Washington from 5 to 10. Owing to outward migration, New York lost seats, from 43 to 26, Pennsylvania from 36 to 17, Illinois from 27 to 17, Ohio from 22 to 15, and Missouri from 16 to 8. We should make it easy for people to migrate to other States and recognize and respect their constitutional rights everywhere and make their life easier and safe. That will resolve our demographic challenges. Most states reached low fertility levels, and Bihar, UP, MP, Rajasthan and Jharkhand too are going to reach there in a few years. We need a reasoned and pragmatic approach to grow together and become strong. Let us persuade parties to shed inflammatory and divisive rhetoric and focus on quality education and skills and opportunities for all.

Does the election commission of India even exist anymore? Is the Model Code of Conduct not in place before the state assembly polls? Is Modi above the law of the country to be allowed to make such a speech without his text being approved? If not, will he be censured by the ECI?

In his speech today, Mr Modi compared the rejection of Delimitation Bill with feticide. It's not a secret how female feticide has plagued our country for centuries. Seeking sympathy from women is one thing, but comparing a bill rejection with feticide? Everyday a new low for this man.

I see the media refuses to call it a political speech that is a violation of the MCC, instead focusing on the “takeaways”. Take them all away, please.