Kung Fu

3.3K posts

Kung Fu banner
Kung Fu

Kung Fu

@Chart_Fu

a normie tackling macro economics, technical analysis and geopolitics.

参加日 Aralık 2017
752 フォロー中547 フォロワー
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
U.S. Treasury Sanctions Cambodian Senator Running Massive Human Trafficking Scam Empire On April 23, 2026, the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctioned Cambodian Senator Kok An and 28 individuals and entities in his network for allegedly operating massive scam compounds that stole millions from Americans. These operations — often called “pig butchering” scams — use fake romantic relationships and investment schemes to trick victims into sending cryptocurrency to fraudulent platforms. Senator Kok An’s network allegedly controlled casinos and resorts turned into fraud factories, where victims of human trafficking were forced to work under brutal conditions: passports confiscated, debt bondage, physical violence, and impossible daily quotas. This isn’t a small criminal ring. Americans lost an estimated $10 billion in 2024 alone to Southeast Asia-based scam operations — a 66% increase from the previous year. The Treasury’s action, coordinated with the Scam Center Strike Force (DOJ, FBI, Secret Service), targets not just the foot soldiers but the politically connected operators at the top. A sitting senator running human trafficking scam centers that prey on Americans should shock people. It exposes how some foreign elites use political power to protect industrial-scale fraud and exploitation. This fits a larger, ugly pattern: illicit capital flows that extract wealth from ordinary people while protected by compromised local officials. From Venezuelan gold smuggling networks to these Cambodian compounds, the same mechanics persist — human suffering turned into profit, laundered through opaque financial channels. The Trump administration’s response is a clear signal of a shifting approach: using sanctions, law enforcement, and targeted pressure to disrupt these networks instead of treating them as distant problems. It’s mercantilist realism in action — protecting American citizens and capital from foreign predation rather than endlessly subsidizing or ignoring it. For too long, these scam centers operated with impunity because the victims were scattered and the operators had political cover. The Treasury’s action shows the U.S. is finally treating these operations as the national security and economic threat they are. This is more than one senator in Cambodia. It’s another crack in the old globalist scarcity machine that allowed exploitation networks to thrive while ordinary people paid the price. Americans deserve aggressive action against these predators. The more these networks are exposed and dismantled, the harder it becomes for the old extraction model to survive.The era of looking the other way is ending. Treasury Sanctions Cambodian Senator Kok An and Scam Center Network Defrauding Americans | U.S. Department of the Treasury share.google/mQ1znHMXPKnJOv…
English
0
0
0
20
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The New Republic is at it again — turning a legitimate scientific debate into conspiracy. The CDC recently declined to publish a study in its flagship journal (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) that used an observational “test-negative” design to estimate COVID vaccine effectiveness last winter. Acting CDC Director Jay Bhattacharya and HHS cited concerns that the methodology gave an “inaccurate picture” of the vaccine’s real-world benefit. This is not suppression of “proof the vaccine works.” It’s a debate over scientific standards. The test-negative design is common for flu and respiratory viruses, but it has well-known limitations — especially with COVID, where prior infection, testing behavior, and seasonality can confound results. Bhattacharya and the MMWR editorial team wanted stronger evidence before putting the CDC’s name on it. The study authors reportedly refused to adjust the design. The New Republic immediately framed this as political censorship by RFK Jr.’s team — the same outlet that spent years pushing narratives with far less scrutiny. They conveniently omitted that the decision came after internal scientific review and focused on methodology, not safety or politics. This is classic reframing: any time the current administration applies higher evidentiary standards, it’s portrayed as anti-science. RFK Jr. and Jay Bhattacharya have been clear: they want rigorous, transparent science at the CDC and FDA — not automatic publication of observational data that may overstate benefits or understate risks. That’s not “blocking lifesaving information.” It’s responsible oversight after years of public health overreach and eroded trust. The real story isn’t conspiracy. It’s a long-overdue push for better standards at agencies that spent years demanding blind compliance while ignoring legitimate methodological concerns. The New Republic doesn’t want that conversation. They want the old narrative back. Americans deserve honest science, not politicized journals or activist media spinning every disagreement as dangerous. If the data are strong, let them stand up to scrutiny. If the methodology is weak, it shouldn’t wear the CDC’s seal of approval.That’s not anti-vaccine. That’s pro-science. RFK Jr.’s CDC Delays Report Proving the Covid Vaccine Worked | The New Republic share.google/F4U9wR4qDfSHCW…

QME
0
0
0
2
ARPA-H
ARPA-H@ARPA_H·
Seventeen people will die today waiting for an organ transplant. The waitlist? Currently over 100,000 people. ARPA-H has launched TIGAR so that in the future, no American will ever have lose their life waiting for a donor. TIGAR will fast-track bold ideas for temperature-flexible storage of complex tissues to power the future of regenerative medicine. We are looking to partner with the brightest minds in America. Submit your proposal: arpa-h.gov/explore-fundin…
English
16
28
107
15.5K
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The New Republic is at it again — turning a legitimate scientific debate into conspiracy. The CDC recently declined to publish a study in its flagship journal (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) that used an observational “test-negative” design to estimate COVID vaccine effectiveness last winter. Acting CDC Director Jay Bhattacharya and HHS cited concerns that the methodology gave an “inaccurate picture” of the vaccine’s real-world benefit. This is not suppression of “proof the vaccine works.” It’s a debate over scientific standards. The test-negative design is common for flu and respiratory viruses, but it has well-known limitations — especially with COVID, where prior infection, testing behavior, and seasonality can confound results. Bhattacharya and the MMWR editorial team wanted stronger evidence before putting the CDC’s name on it. The study authors reportedly refused to adjust the design. The New Republic immediately framed this as political censorship by RFK Jr.’s team — the same outlet that spent years pushing narratives with far less scrutiny. They conveniently omitted that the decision came after internal scientific review and focused on methodology, not safety or politics. This is classic reframing: any time the current administration applies higher evidentiary standards, it’s portrayed as anti-science. RFK Jr. and Jay Bhattacharya have been clear: they want rigorous, transparent science at the CDC and FDA — not automatic publication of observational data that may overstate benefits or understate risks. That’s not “blocking lifesaving information.” It’s responsible oversight after years of public health overreach and eroded trust. The real story isn’t conspiracy. It’s a long-overdue push for better standards at agencies that spent years demanding blind compliance while ignoring legitimate methodological concerns. The New Republic doesn’t want that conversation. They want the old narrative back. Americans deserve honest science, not politicized journals or activist media spinning every disagreement as dangerous. If the data are strong, let them stand up to scrutiny. If the methodology is weak, it shouldn’t wear the CDC’s seal of approval.That’s not anti-vaccine. That’s pro-science. RFK Jr.’s CDC Delays Report Proving the Covid Vaccine Worked | The New Republic share.google/F4U9wR4qDfSHCW…

QME
0
0
0
16
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The New Republic is at it again — turning a legitimate scientific debate into conspiracy. The CDC recently declined to publish a study in its flagship journal (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) that used an observational “test-negative” design to estimate COVID vaccine effectiveness last winter. Acting CDC Director Jay Bhattacharya and HHS cited concerns that the methodology gave an “inaccurate picture” of the vaccine’s real-world benefit. This is not suppression of “proof the vaccine works.” It’s a debate over scientific standards. The test-negative design is common for flu and respiratory viruses, but it has well-known limitations — especially with COVID, where prior infection, testing behavior, and seasonality can confound results. Bhattacharya and the MMWR editorial team wanted stronger evidence before putting the CDC’s name on it. The study authors reportedly refused to adjust the design. The New Republic immediately framed this as political censorship by RFK Jr.’s team — the same outlet that spent years pushing narratives with far less scrutiny. They conveniently omitted that the decision came after internal scientific review and focused on methodology, not safety or politics. This is classic reframing: any time the current administration applies higher evidentiary standards, it’s portrayed as anti-science. RFK Jr. and Jay Bhattacharya have been clear: they want rigorous, transparent science at the CDC and FDA — not automatic publication of observational data that may overstate benefits or understate risks. That’s not “blocking lifesaving information.” It’s responsible oversight after years of public health overreach and eroded trust. The real story isn’t conspiracy. It’s a long-overdue push for better standards at agencies that spent years demanding blind compliance while ignoring legitimate methodological concerns. The New Republic doesn’t want that conversation. They want the old narrative back. Americans deserve honest science, not politicized journals or activist media spinning every disagreement as dangerous. If the data are strong, let them stand up to scrutiny. If the methodology is weak, it shouldn’t wear the CDC’s seal of approval.That’s not anti-vaccine. That’s pro-science. RFK Jr.’s CDC Delays Report Proving the Covid Vaccine Worked | The New Republic share.google/F4U9wR4qDfSHCW…

QME
0
0
0
3
DrOzCMS
DrOzCMS@DrOzCMS·
It’s time for a nationwide audit of Medicaid. Every governor can be part of the solution or part of the problem.
English
436
1.9K
7.2K
80.4K
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The New Republic is at it again — turning a legitimate scientific debate into conspiracy. The CDC recently declined to publish a study in its flagship journal (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) that used an observational “test-negative” design to estimate COVID vaccine effectiveness last winter. Acting CDC Director Jay Bhattacharya and HHS cited concerns that the methodology gave an “inaccurate picture” of the vaccine’s real-world benefit. This is not suppression of “proof the vaccine works.” It’s a debate over scientific standards. The test-negative design is common for flu and respiratory viruses, but it has well-known limitations — especially with COVID, where prior infection, testing behavior, and seasonality can confound results. Bhattacharya and the MMWR editorial team wanted stronger evidence before putting the CDC’s name on it. The study authors reportedly refused to adjust the design. The New Republic immediately framed this as political censorship by RFK Jr.’s team — the same outlet that spent years pushing narratives with far less scrutiny. They conveniently omitted that the decision came after internal scientific review and focused on methodology, not safety or politics. This is classic reframing: any time the current administration applies higher evidentiary standards, it’s portrayed as anti-science. RFK Jr. and Jay Bhattacharya have been clear: they want rigorous, transparent science at the CDC and FDA — not automatic publication of observational data that may overstate benefits or understate risks. That’s not “blocking lifesaving information.” It’s responsible oversight after years of public health overreach and eroded trust. The real story isn’t conspiracy. It’s a long-overdue push for better standards at agencies that spent years demanding blind compliance while ignoring legitimate methodological concerns. The New Republic doesn’t want that conversation. They want the old narrative back. Americans deserve honest science, not politicized journals or activist media spinning every disagreement as dangerous. If the data are strong, let them stand up to scrutiny. If the methodology is weak, it shouldn’t wear the CDC’s seal of approval.That’s not anti-vaccine. That’s pro-science. RFK Jr.’s CDC Delays Report Proving the Covid Vaccine Worked | The New Republic share.google/F4U9wR4qDfSHCW…

QME
0
0
0
5
Deputy Commissioner Kyle Diamantas
Under the leadership of @SecKennedy, we’ve officially launched the FDA's first-ever Office of Post-Market Review. We’re moving from a reactive model to a proactive one, because the American people deserve an @US_FDA that isn’t just watching, but actively working for them.
English
25
64
476
25.9K
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The New Republic is at it again — turning a legitimate scientific debate into conspiracy. The CDC recently declined to publish a study in its flagship journal (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) that used an observational “test-negative” design to estimate COVID vaccine effectiveness last winter. Acting CDC Director Jay Bhattacharya and HHS cited concerns that the methodology gave an “inaccurate picture” of the vaccine’s real-world benefit. This is not suppression of “proof the vaccine works.” It’s a debate over scientific standards. The test-negative design is common for flu and respiratory viruses, but it has well-known limitations — especially with COVID, where prior infection, testing behavior, and seasonality can confound results. Bhattacharya and the MMWR editorial team wanted stronger evidence before putting the CDC’s name on it. The study authors reportedly refused to adjust the design. The New Republic immediately framed this as political censorship by RFK Jr.’s team — the same outlet that spent years pushing narratives with far less scrutiny. They conveniently omitted that the decision came after internal scientific review and focused on methodology, not safety or politics. This is classic reframing: any time the current administration applies higher evidentiary standards, it’s portrayed as anti-science. RFK Jr. and Jay Bhattacharya have been clear: they want rigorous, transparent science at the CDC and FDA — not automatic publication of observational data that may overstate benefits or understate risks. That’s not “blocking lifesaving information.” It’s responsible oversight after years of public health overreach and eroded trust. The real story isn’t conspiracy. It’s a long-overdue push for better standards at agencies that spent years demanding blind compliance while ignoring legitimate methodological concerns. The New Republic doesn’t want that conversation. They want the old narrative back. Americans deserve honest science, not politicized journals or activist media spinning every disagreement as dangerous. If the data are strong, let them stand up to scrutiny. If the methodology is weak, it shouldn’t wear the CDC’s seal of approval.That’s not anti-vaccine. That’s pro-science. RFK Jr.’s CDC Delays Report Proving the Covid Vaccine Worked | The New Republic share.google/F4U9wR4qDfSHCW…

QME
0
0
0
16
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The New Republic is at it again — turning a legitimate scientific debate into conspiracy. The CDC recently declined to publish a study in its flagship journal (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) that used an observational “test-negative” design to estimate COVID vaccine effectiveness last winter. Acting CDC Director Jay Bhattacharya and HHS cited concerns that the methodology gave an “inaccurate picture” of the vaccine’s real-world benefit. This is not suppression of “proof the vaccine works.” It’s a debate over scientific standards. The test-negative design is common for flu and respiratory viruses, but it has well-known limitations — especially with COVID, where prior infection, testing behavior, and seasonality can confound results. Bhattacharya and the MMWR editorial team wanted stronger evidence before putting the CDC’s name on it. The study authors reportedly refused to adjust the design. The New Republic immediately framed this as political censorship by RFK Jr.’s team — the same outlet that spent years pushing narratives with far less scrutiny. They conveniently omitted that the decision came after internal scientific review and focused on methodology, not safety or politics. This is classic reframing: any time the current administration applies higher evidentiary standards, it’s portrayed as anti-science. RFK Jr. and Jay Bhattacharya have been clear: they want rigorous, transparent science at the CDC and FDA — not automatic publication of observational data that may overstate benefits or understate risks. That’s not “blocking lifesaving information.” It’s responsible oversight after years of public health overreach and eroded trust. The real story isn’t conspiracy. It’s a long-overdue push for better standards at agencies that spent years demanding blind compliance while ignoring legitimate methodological concerns. The New Republic doesn’t want that conversation. They want the old narrative back. Americans deserve honest science, not politicized journals or activist media spinning every disagreement as dangerous. If the data are strong, let them stand up to scrutiny. If the methodology is weak, it shouldn’t wear the CDC’s seal of approval.That’s not anti-vaccine. That’s pro-science. RFK Jr.’s CDC Delays Report Proving the Covid Vaccine Worked | The New Republic share.google/F4U9wR4qDfSHCW…

QME
0
0
0
21
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
The New Republic is at it again — turning a legitimate scientific debate into conspiracy. The CDC recently declined to publish a study in its flagship journal (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report) that used an observational “test-negative” design to estimate COVID vaccine effectiveness last winter. Acting CDC Director Jay Bhattacharya and HHS cited concerns that the methodology gave an “inaccurate picture” of the vaccine’s real-world benefit. This is not suppression of “proof the vaccine works.” It’s a debate over scientific standards. The test-negative design is common for flu and respiratory viruses, but it has well-known limitations — especially with COVID, where prior infection, testing behavior, and seasonality can confound results. Bhattacharya and the MMWR editorial team wanted stronger evidence before putting the CDC’s name on it. The study authors reportedly refused to adjust the design. The New Republic immediately framed this as political censorship by RFK Jr.’s team — the same outlet that spent years pushing narratives with far less scrutiny. They conveniently omitted that the decision came after internal scientific review and focused on methodology, not safety or politics. This is classic reframing: any time the current administration applies higher evidentiary standards, it’s portrayed as anti-science. RFK Jr. and Jay Bhattacharya have been clear: they want rigorous, transparent science at the CDC and FDA — not automatic publication of observational data that may overstate benefits or understate risks. That’s not “blocking lifesaving information.” It’s responsible oversight after years of public health overreach and eroded trust. The real story isn’t conspiracy. It’s a long-overdue push for better standards at agencies that spent years demanding blind compliance while ignoring legitimate methodological concerns. The New Republic doesn’t want that conversation. They want the old narrative back. Americans deserve honest science, not politicized journals or activist media spinning every disagreement as dangerous. If the data are strong, let them stand up to scrutiny. If the methodology is weak, it shouldn’t wear the CDC’s seal of approval.That’s not anti-vaccine. That’s pro-science. RFK Jr.’s CDC Delays Report Proving the Covid Vaccine Worked | The New Republic share.google/F4U9wR4qDfSHCW…
English
0
0
1
98
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) Are Quietly Wrecking Communities — And CVS Is Leading the Charge Pharmacy Benefit Managers were supposed to negotiate better drug prices for patients and employers. Instead, they’ve become one of the most powerful and opaque middlemen in American healthcare, extracting massive profits while driving up costs and shutting down local pharmacies. PBMs control which drugs are covered, how much pharmacies get paid, and where patients can fill prescriptions. They use spread pricing, opaque rebates, and steering tactics to pocket billions while patients and independent pharmacies suffer. The result? Higher out-of-pocket costs for patients, forced closures of local pharmacies, and “pharmacy deserts” in many communities. CVS Health is the poster child for this broken model. Through its CVS Caremark PBM, CVS owns both the middleman and thousands of retail pharmacies. This vertical integration creates massive conflicts of interest. CVS has been repeatedly accused of steering prescriptions to its own stores, imposing harsh clawbacks on independent pharmacies, and prioritizing its own profits over patient access and affordability. The damage to communities is real. When independent pharmacies close because they can’t compete with CVS’s integrated model, patients lose convenient access, personal relationships with pharmacists, and local economic anchors. Rural and smaller towns are hit hardest. Two states are fighting back: In Arkansas, lawmakers passed strong PBM reform legislation banning PBM ownership of pharmacies and requiring greater transparency. CVS sued the state, claiming the law would force store closures and harm patients. The legal battle is still ongoing. Now Tennessee has passed its own aggressive bill (the FAIR Rx Act), which prohibits PBMs from owning or controlling pharmacies in the state starting in 2027–2028. CVS has already threatened to sue and claims the law would force it to close many — possibly all — of its Tennessee locations. This is the same company that benefits enormously from the current system. When states try to protect patients and independent pharmacies from vertical integration abuse, CVS’s response is to threaten closures and lawsuits. The PBM model has become a classic case of corporate extraction: middlemen insert themselves between patients, doctors, and pharmacies, skim massive profits, and then cry foul when anyone tries to rein them in. Americans deserve better than a healthcare system where a handful of giant corporations control the flow of prescriptions and profits. States like Arkansas and Tennessee are right to push back. The rest of the country should be watching closely.When middlemen get too powerful, patients and communities pay the price. Tennessee House passes bill to restrict PBM-owned pharmacies share.google/rSRqfJTnhWh1r9…
English
0
1
1
56
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
@MaxBlumenthal All roads lead to London Max. x.com/i/status/20462…
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

London’s Hidden Chain: How the Iran Conflict Is Finally Breaking It Most people see London as a stylish financial capital with historic buildings and red buses. But for the last century, the City of London has quietly acted like a heavy chain holding back the world.After World War I, the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement — a 1916 British-French deal — carved up the Ottoman Empire and drew messy borders across the Middle East. Those artificial lines created endless conflicts and resource fights. The result was built-in scarcity: expensive oil, jumpy gold prices, and constant tension that kept money flowing through London’s banks, insurance markets (Lloyd’s), and gold trading hub (LBMA). The LBMA, which dominates global gold and silver pricing, has long been accused of enabling artificial price suppression through massive paper trading and short positions. This kept metals undervalued for years, making it harder for ordinary people and producing nations to build real wealth from their resources. Instead of fair market signals encouraging investment and innovation, the system funneled gains back toward London’s financial insiders. London also built the Eurodollar market in the 1950s — an offshore dollar system that let the City influence global interest rates through LIBOR. For decades, the cost of borrowing dollars worldwide was partly set in London, not Washington. This gave London extra leverage over the global economy. The darker side is even clearer. Networks tied to Iran’s IRGC, Hezbollah, and Venezuela’s regime have moved billions through gold-smuggling routes and oil-for-gold swaps. Venezuelan gold and cartel money flowed through Toronto and London-linked banks. IRGC and Hezbollah used Turkish gold markets and London bullion channels to launder funds and finance operations. Lloyd’s itself flagged these IRGC/Hezbollah gold routes years ago, and U.S. sanctions in April 2026 again exposed the same networks — Iranian oil swapped for Venezuelan gold, sold on Turkey’s black market, with proceeds cycling back through familiar financial plumbing. Right now, the Iran conflict is ripping that chain apart in real time. U.S. and Israeli strikes began February 28, 2026. Iran choked the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting 20% of global oil. Prices spiked hard. But look at the futures market: WTI (the U.S. benchmark) went into extreme backwardation — prompt oil traded $20–$40+ above later contracts — and briefly traded above Brent (London’s benchmark). Traders are paying huge premiums for immediate, reliable barrels that don’t need Hormuz. The old London-centric pricing web is losing control. This isn’t random chaos. It’s the scarcity machine cracking. Europe still feels the echo — heavy regulations, energy squeezes, and policies that suppress local wages while flooding in immigrants. The Biden administration in the US mirrored this path almost exactly: record border encounters, expanded migration that increased labor supply and pressured wages for American workers, while layering on more institutional dependency mechanisms. Both sides kept the old scarcity playbook alive.The Iran conflict is doing what years of talk couldn’t: it’s forcing real trade to reroute away from London’s extractive plumbing. The chain held humanity back long enough. The multipolar world is finally shaking it loose.

English
0
0
0
41
Max Blumenthal
Max Blumenthal@MaxBlumenthal·
There's still a wing of MAGA that believes Trump is a King David-like figure who's being used by God to serve a holy purpose And no amount of insider trading, Epstein associating or school bombing can convince them otherwise My latest
The Grayzone@TheGrayzoneNews

Trump reads Scripture at MAGA Bible marathon @MaxBlumenthal visited a DC gathering of evangelicals who insisted that the notoriously sinful president had been chosen by God to "heal" the nation There, he probed them on the Iran war and Israel's assault on Christian communities

English
179
1.3K
5K
94.2K
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
@RonPaul Why doesn't @RonPaul ever focus on London? x.com/i/status/20462…
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

London’s Hidden Chain: How the Iran Conflict Is Finally Breaking It Most people see London as a stylish financial capital with historic buildings and red buses. But for the last century, the City of London has quietly acted like a heavy chain holding back the world.After World War I, the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement — a 1916 British-French deal — carved up the Ottoman Empire and drew messy borders across the Middle East. Those artificial lines created endless conflicts and resource fights. The result was built-in scarcity: expensive oil, jumpy gold prices, and constant tension that kept money flowing through London’s banks, insurance markets (Lloyd’s), and gold trading hub (LBMA). The LBMA, which dominates global gold and silver pricing, has long been accused of enabling artificial price suppression through massive paper trading and short positions. This kept metals undervalued for years, making it harder for ordinary people and producing nations to build real wealth from their resources. Instead of fair market signals encouraging investment and innovation, the system funneled gains back toward London’s financial insiders. London also built the Eurodollar market in the 1950s — an offshore dollar system that let the City influence global interest rates through LIBOR. For decades, the cost of borrowing dollars worldwide was partly set in London, not Washington. This gave London extra leverage over the global economy. The darker side is even clearer. Networks tied to Iran’s IRGC, Hezbollah, and Venezuela’s regime have moved billions through gold-smuggling routes and oil-for-gold swaps. Venezuelan gold and cartel money flowed through Toronto and London-linked banks. IRGC and Hezbollah used Turkish gold markets and London bullion channels to launder funds and finance operations. Lloyd’s itself flagged these IRGC/Hezbollah gold routes years ago, and U.S. sanctions in April 2026 again exposed the same networks — Iranian oil swapped for Venezuelan gold, sold on Turkey’s black market, with proceeds cycling back through familiar financial plumbing. Right now, the Iran conflict is ripping that chain apart in real time. U.S. and Israeli strikes began February 28, 2026. Iran choked the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting 20% of global oil. Prices spiked hard. But look at the futures market: WTI (the U.S. benchmark) went into extreme backwardation — prompt oil traded $20–$40+ above later contracts — and briefly traded above Brent (London’s benchmark). Traders are paying huge premiums for immediate, reliable barrels that don’t need Hormuz. The old London-centric pricing web is losing control. This isn’t random chaos. It’s the scarcity machine cracking. Europe still feels the echo — heavy regulations, energy squeezes, and policies that suppress local wages while flooding in immigrants. The Biden administration in the US mirrored this path almost exactly: record border encounters, expanded migration that increased labor supply and pressured wages for American workers, while layering on more institutional dependency mechanisms. Both sides kept the old scarcity playbook alive.The Iran conflict is doing what years of talk couldn’t: it’s forcing real trade to reroute away from London’s extractive plumbing. The chain held humanity back long enough. The multipolar world is finally shaking it loose.

English
0
0
0
69
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Canada’s MAiD Program: From “Compassionate Choice” to Government Solution for Healthcare Failure When Canada legalized Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in 2016, it was sold as a tightly controlled option for terminally ill adults facing unbearable suffering. Safeguards were promised. Fast-forward to 2026: MAiD has become one of the fastest-growing causes of death in Canada. In 2024 alone, 16,499 people received MAiD — roughly 5.1% of all deaths that year. The program now covers grievous and irremediable non-terminal conditions, and expansion to mental illness as the sole underlying condition is scheduled for 2027. Reports and coroner reviews document cases where individuals were offered or chose MAiD due to long wait times for treatment, poverty, inadequate housing, or inability to afford basic support. What began as an end-of-life choice has quietly morphed into a bureaucratic exit ramp for problems the government finds expensive or difficult to solve. This expansion didn’t happen in a vacuum. It coincides with massive policy strains driven by globalist priorities: rapid immigration that has overwhelmed housing, healthcare, and social services, combined with chronic fiscal deficits from expansive spending. When systems are stretched thin, offering death becomes an easier, cheaper pressure valve than fixing root failures in care delivery and support. This is the predictable outcome when governments treat human life as a budget line item. Expanding eligibility reduces pressure to reform failing systems. It becomes easier — and cheaper — to offer death than to deliver care. Canadians deserve better than a healthcare policy that treats vulnerable citizens as problems to be solved through lethal injection. True compassion means fixing the underlying failures — wait times, mental health services, housing, and disability support — not offering assisted death as the default solution. The expansion of MAiD wasn’t an accident. It was the logical endpoint of treating death as a cost-saving measure rather than a last resort. That should trouble every citizen, regardless of political affiliation.
English
0
2
2
149
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
El Salvador’s Regenerative Agriculture Move Is What Real Mercantilism Looks Like While much of the West remains stuck in outdated globalist thinking, El Salvador just took a practical, sovereign step forward. On April 16, 2026, the Bukele government launched a National Regenerative Agriculture Initiative. The goal is straightforward: regenerate degraded soils, boost food security, increase productivity, and connect farmers directly to competitive markets. It includes technical training through CENTA, reform of the cooperative system, incentives for underused land, and integration with “AgroMercado” for better pricing and export potential. This isn’t abstract ideology. It’s a mercantilist approach in action: a nation deliberately investing in its own productive capacity — healthy soil, resilient food systems, and long-term economic strength — rather than relying on imported inputs, global supply chains, or endless foreign aid. Contrast that with the globalist model that has dominated for decades. Globalism encourages countries to specialize in whatever is “cheapest” at the moment, often leading to soil degradation, dependency on volatile international markets, and weakened domestic resilience. It prioritizes open borders for goods and capital while ignoring the long-term health of the land and the people who work it. El Salvador is choosing a different path: build internal strength first. Strengthen the soil, reform cooperatives for fairness and output, develop both staple crops and high-value regenerative exports, and align government coordination with private sector mobilization. It’s pragmatic nationalism — using the state to catalyze real productivity instead of managing decline. This is the kind of thinking the United States desperately needs right now. We have vast agricultural potential, but we’ve allowed soil degradation, regulatory capture, and over-reliance on industrial inputs to weaken our food system. A serious American mercantilist approach would focus on regenerating our own farmland, reducing vulnerability to global shocks, and prioritizing domestic food security and export competitiveness — not just shipping more grain overseas while our own soil erodes. El Salvador’s move is small but directional. It shows a government choosing to solve problems at the root instead of kicking the can down the road. If the U.S. wants to thrive in the emerging multipolar world, we should be watching examples like this closely. Mercantilism isn’t about isolation. It’s about building real national strength — starting with the land under our feet. The old globalist model is fading. Nations that invest in their own productive base will be the ones that come out ahead. ADDN - Agencia de Desarrollo y Diseño de Nación share.google/kePuQWWDcq24Rb…
English
0
2
3
139
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The Southern Poverty Law Center — the same group that spent decades labeling millions of Americans as “hate groups” and raising hundreds of millions in donations — has now been federally indicted on 11 counts including wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering conspiracy. The core allegation: From 2014 to 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled over $3 million to actual Klansmen, neo-Nazis, Aryan Nations members, and other violent extremists. They allegedly used shell companies like “Fox Photography” and “Rare Books Warehouse,” plus prepaid cards, to hide the payments from donors and the banking system. One informant received over $1 million while affiliated with the neo-Nazi National Alliance. Another was paid $270,000 while helping coordinate logistics for the 2017 Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally — at the direction of the SPLC. This is the same SPLC whose “hate map” was treated as gospel by the Obama and Biden administrations, corporate media, and Big Tech. Remember the “very fine people” hoax? Biden, Obama, and the press spent years claiming Trump called neo-Nazis “very fine people” in Charlottesville. It was a deliberate lie used to paint half the country as irredeemable racists and justify censorship, lawfare, and political persecution. Now we learn the very institution feeding that narrative was allegedly paying the actual extremists they claimed to oppose. This isn’t incompetence. This is the business model: manufacture the enemy, then monetize the fight against it. The mask is slipping. The American people deserve better than NGOs that allegedly funded Nazis while calling their neighbors Nazis. The narrative you were sold for years was a con. Time to demand better.

QME
0
0
0
10
Jeffrey A Tucker
Jeffrey A Tucker@jeffreytucker·
This is stunning: the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, VA, the most notorious of all the extremist displays of the last ten years, tiki torches and all, was actually a subsidized racket funded by the supposedly anti-hate SPLC. The DOJ has all the receipts. I'm not cynical enough to have imagined such a thing. x.com/Tyler2ONeil/st…
English
363
2.1K
10.6K
487.8K
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The Southern Poverty Law Center — the same group that spent decades labeling millions of Americans as “hate groups” and raising hundreds of millions in donations — has now been federally indicted on 11 counts including wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering conspiracy. The core allegation: From 2014 to 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled over $3 million to actual Klansmen, neo-Nazis, Aryan Nations members, and other violent extremists. They allegedly used shell companies like “Fox Photography” and “Rare Books Warehouse,” plus prepaid cards, to hide the payments from donors and the banking system. One informant received over $1 million while affiliated with the neo-Nazi National Alliance. Another was paid $270,000 while helping coordinate logistics for the 2017 Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally — at the direction of the SPLC. This is the same SPLC whose “hate map” was treated as gospel by the Obama and Biden administrations, corporate media, and Big Tech. Remember the “very fine people” hoax? Biden, Obama, and the press spent years claiming Trump called neo-Nazis “very fine people” in Charlottesville. It was a deliberate lie used to paint half the country as irredeemable racists and justify censorship, lawfare, and political persecution. Now we learn the very institution feeding that narrative was allegedly paying the actual extremists they claimed to oppose. This isn’t incompetence. This is the business model: manufacture the enemy, then monetize the fight against it. The mask is slipping. The American people deserve better than NGOs that allegedly funded Nazis while calling their neighbors Nazis. The narrative you were sold for years was a con. Time to demand better.

QME
0
0
0
17
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The Southern Poverty Law Center — the same group that spent decades labeling millions of Americans as “hate groups” and raising hundreds of millions in donations — has now been federally indicted on 11 counts including wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering conspiracy. The core allegation: From 2014 to 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled over $3 million to actual Klansmen, neo-Nazis, Aryan Nations members, and other violent extremists. They allegedly used shell companies like “Fox Photography” and “Rare Books Warehouse,” plus prepaid cards, to hide the payments from donors and the banking system. One informant received over $1 million while affiliated with the neo-Nazi National Alliance. Another was paid $270,000 while helping coordinate logistics for the 2017 Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally — at the direction of the SPLC. This is the same SPLC whose “hate map” was treated as gospel by the Obama and Biden administrations, corporate media, and Big Tech. Remember the “very fine people” hoax? Biden, Obama, and the press spent years claiming Trump called neo-Nazis “very fine people” in Charlottesville. It was a deliberate lie used to paint half the country as irredeemable racists and justify censorship, lawfare, and political persecution. Now we learn the very institution feeding that narrative was allegedly paying the actual extremists they claimed to oppose. This isn’t incompetence. This is the business model: manufacture the enemy, then monetize the fight against it. The mask is slipping. The American people deserve better than NGOs that allegedly funded Nazis while calling their neighbors Nazis. The narrative you were sold for years was a con. Time to demand better.

QME
0
0
0
75
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The Southern Poverty Law Center — the same group that spent decades labeling millions of Americans as “hate groups” and raising hundreds of millions in donations — has now been federally indicted on 11 counts including wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering conspiracy. The core allegation: From 2014 to 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled over $3 million to actual Klansmen, neo-Nazis, Aryan Nations members, and other violent extremists. They allegedly used shell companies like “Fox Photography” and “Rare Books Warehouse,” plus prepaid cards, to hide the payments from donors and the banking system. One informant received over $1 million while affiliated with the neo-Nazi National Alliance. Another was paid $270,000 while helping coordinate logistics for the 2017 Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally — at the direction of the SPLC. This is the same SPLC whose “hate map” was treated as gospel by the Obama and Biden administrations, corporate media, and Big Tech. Remember the “very fine people” hoax? Biden, Obama, and the press spent years claiming Trump called neo-Nazis “very fine people” in Charlottesville. It was a deliberate lie used to paint half the country as irredeemable racists and justify censorship, lawfare, and political persecution. Now we learn the very institution feeding that narrative was allegedly paying the actual extremists they claimed to oppose. This isn’t incompetence. This is the business model: manufacture the enemy, then monetize the fight against it. The mask is slipping. The American people deserve better than NGOs that allegedly funded Nazis while calling their neighbors Nazis. The narrative you were sold for years was a con. Time to demand better.

QME
0
0
0
17
FBI
FBI@FBI·
NEWS RELEASE: Federal Grand Jury Charges Southern Poverty Law Center for Wire Fraud, False Statements, and Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering Between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled more than $3 million in donated funds to individuals who were associated with various violent extremist groups including the Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, and National Socialist Party of America. Read more about the #FBI investigation: justice.gov/opa/pr/federal…
FBI tweet media
English
317
2K
6.1K
257.6K
Kung Fu
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu·
Kung Fu@Chart_Fu

The Southern Poverty Law Center — the same group that spent decades labeling millions of Americans as “hate groups” and raising hundreds of millions in donations — has now been federally indicted on 11 counts including wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering conspiracy. The core allegation: From 2014 to 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled over $3 million to actual Klansmen, neo-Nazis, Aryan Nations members, and other violent extremists. They allegedly used shell companies like “Fox Photography” and “Rare Books Warehouse,” plus prepaid cards, to hide the payments from donors and the banking system. One informant received over $1 million while affiliated with the neo-Nazi National Alliance. Another was paid $270,000 while helping coordinate logistics for the 2017 Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally — at the direction of the SPLC. This is the same SPLC whose “hate map” was treated as gospel by the Obama and Biden administrations, corporate media, and Big Tech. Remember the “very fine people” hoax? Biden, Obama, and the press spent years claiming Trump called neo-Nazis “very fine people” in Charlottesville. It was a deliberate lie used to paint half the country as irredeemable racists and justify censorship, lawfare, and political persecution. Now we learn the very institution feeding that narrative was allegedly paying the actual extremists they claimed to oppose. This isn’t incompetence. This is the business model: manufacture the enemy, then monetize the fight against it. The mask is slipping. The American people deserve better than NGOs that allegedly funded Nazis while calling their neighbors Nazis. The narrative you were sold for years was a con. Time to demand better.

QME
0
0
0
64