Factual Thinker
77 posts

Factual Thinker
@FactualLiving
My views in a world gone crazy😵💫 Feel free to share my content🎦 Follow to keep up to date with my thoughts💡

We have Muslim fatigue. The gang rapes. The terrorism. The killing of little girls who enjoy music. The hatred of women and girls. The special courts. The anti semitism. The hate preachers. The marches. The violence. The call to prayer. The public prayers. The complaining about christian preachers. The pauses in football games for skipping lunch. The nicabs. The school kids visiting mosques. The ramadan lights. The ramadan messages on TV and by public figures. The cruel slaughter. The hatred of the West. The hatred of women. The barbarism. The inbreeding. The censorship. The two tier justice. The capture of our institutions. We're tired of it. Islam is a vile woman hating cousin marrying child rape appeasing death cult.






I used to be bothered about being called a racist. Now I do not give a flying shit. Anyone else feel the same?















#PMQs 'Would the PM agree, "The price for a trial that is prejudiced is ultimately paid by the victims and their families who are deprived of the justice that they deserve," as he himself said on 2 August 2024? 'In Scottish law cases are "active" from arrest, criminal liability for prejudicing jury pools, for example, triggered from that point—quite opposed to from when someone is charged, as in England & Wales, of course. 'Regarding public speculation over what "a suspect appears to be motivated by," however, the Contempt of Court Act (1981) applies UK-wide to protect the prejudicing of trials under: the strict liability rule. 'Lengthy prosecution for which many, like Tommy Robinson, have spuriously faced while police officers wilfully sabotaging criminal rape gang trials, for decades, have not. 'Yet in respect of the Muslim families about whom they both assert they care thus being "denied justice," in his own words, Humza Yousaf's recklessness as a former First Minister of Scotland—embarrassingly ignorant of Scottish criminal law—were nonetheless just an echo of his own statements: as a sitting Prime Minister. 'Over "apparent" motivations in Edinburgh's alleged knife attack, last weekend. 'Might I therefore remind the House, and apparently himself, of the PM's previous declaration to all MPs that, speculations over Axel Rudakubana's motivations, would not permit Members to claim parliamentary privilege—as the Speaker, then affirmed—without their risking the integrity of a criminal case: legally deemed "active"? 'To say nothing of a private criminal prosecution by Rupert Lowe, imminently liable to test that mechanism's ability to deliver justice to "victims and their families," given the prospect of the CPS refusing to hold both of themselves, accountable, for not heeding His Majesty's Government's own injunction after Southport to: think before you post! 'In order to curtail such a possibility for facing "the full force of the law," would the PM perhaps concur with me now, from the dispatch box, that it really is quite possible to have posted something on 𝕏, merely... in the heat of the moment? 'And if so, would Mr Starmer thereby care to make one of his last acts in office, his issuing of a personal and apology to Mrs Lucy Connolly?' CC: @Keir_Starmer, @TRobinsonNewEra, @HumzaYousaf, @CommonsSpeaker, @RupertLowe10, @LucyTCWife











