Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟

3

17

677

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·2d

@the_UrbanWolf @bryanculbertson @StreetsblogNYC Unless you actually reduce VMT, more cars can only increase deaths. All current evidence and and past data around ridehail shows that AVs will increase car traffic, not reduce or displace it

English

1

5

Urban Wolf@the_UrbanWolf·4d

@bryanculbertson @StreetsblogNYC Unless people are driving 20x more, that's not true. Even if people drive 1.5x more, you would still save lives. Sorry , but math beats your math argument.

English

0

14

100

Streetsblog New York City@StreetsblogNYC·4d

The "AVs are safer" argument is shakier than people want you to believe. nyc.streetsblog.org/2026/04/08/way…

Sean Frank@Seanfrank

People will die to protect taxi drivers jobs. That’s the reality of this decision. Not political, not sensationalized. There will be excess pedestrian deaths because we aren’t rolling out Waymos in NYC. Human lives could be saved.

English

65

8

63

152K

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·3 Nis

@BeckIvrsn @aaron_renn Yes during the dot com bubble

English

1

21

Beck Iverson 🇺🇸@BeckIvrsn·2 Nis

@aaron_renn There was a previous plan?

English

0

1.2K

Aaron M. Renn 🇺🇸@aaron_renn·1 Nis

San Francisco needs to fix its airport runway situation for real. Naturally, the last time the city tried to do this, environmentalists were able to kill the plan. It’s hard to imagine a fix happening now, in a more dysfunctional age.

English

13

3

108

61.4K

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·1 Nis

@stargazermellu rip

166

melody☆@stargazermellu·1 Nis

nooooooooooooOOOOO the demons have won 😭

English

0

36

2.2K

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟がリツイート

bryan culbertson@bryanculbertson·27 Mar

BART has been asked to provide more service with less funding than any rail agency in the nation and yet they still deliver fast, reliable, frequent, safe, and affordable transit on their austerity budget Thank you ATU 1555, AFSCME 3993, and SEIU 1021!

English

7

16

513

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·26 Mar

@Random__Kids @fawfulfan I believe that all 50 states have recognized unmarked crosswalks since the 1930s, although the exact details vary slightly

English

0

9

Random Kid 🇺🇲 🇺🇦 🇮🇱@Random__Kids·26 Mar

@MingweiSamuel @fawfulfan that is ridiculous and dangerous idea don't have a problem with people crossing but they should not have the expectation of cars realizing it is a "cross walk" and stopping is this a California thing? never heard of it before

English

0

11

Matthew Chapman@fawfulfan·25 Mar

So many people angrily replying to this apparently forgot basic driver's ed. An "unmarked crosswalk" is still a legal pedestrian crossing. It's not jaywalking. They have the right of way. You should be stopping for them regardless of whether the LAPD is doing an op.

Collin Rugg@CollinRugg

NEW: The LAPD is setting up drivers by having someone walk across the street in an "unmarked crosswalk" so they can then give tickets to people who don't stop. "Recently, LAPD Van Nuys division conducted a Pedestrian Enforcement Taskforce," they shared online. The LAPD says the trap was made to "promote education" after they've "had a string of accidents that have resulted in fatal or severe injuries related to pedestrians."

English

66

35

415

22.2K

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·26 Mar

@Random__Kids @fawfulfan When a road with sidewalks intersects another road approximately perpendicularly, then unmarked crosswalks exist along the extension of the sidewalks across the second road. Between the red lines here

English

0

17

Random Kid 🇺🇲 🇺🇦 🇮🇱@Random__Kids·26 Mar

@MingweiSamuel @fawfulfan that makes no sense by ur standard every place along a street is an "unmarked" cross walk

English

0

11

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·26 Mar

@MSarelson @fawfulfan (17) CROSSWALK.— (a) That part of a roadway at an intersection included within the connections of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the highway, measured from the curbs or, in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the traversable roadway.

English

1

30

Matt Sarelson, Esq. - Celebrity Attorney & Advisor@MSarelson·25 Mar

@fawfulfan God I love Florida, we don't have stupid shit like this. Our cops enforce jaywalking laws if you cross outside a marked crosswalk.

English

5

0

7

336

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·26 Mar

@Random__Kids @fawfulfan Unmarked crosswalks exist regardless of curb cuts or a grass verge

English

0

12

Random Kid 🇺🇲 🇺🇦 🇮🇱@Random__Kids·25 Mar

@fawfulfan u r post doesn't line up with the video the person clearly walks from the sidewalk over the curb (there is no entry / curb cut to the road) u should at least watch the video before posting about it

English

0

8

242

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@YetiMoose @BoydSteere @mnolangray 4ft to the left of the hydrant is exactly where the unmarked crosswalk begins. Pardon my drawing, the lines are meant to be straight. Hope this helps

English

0

1

26

THE Yeti Moose@YetiMoose·25 Mar

@MingweiSamuel @BoydSteere @mnolangray Watch the video again. At the end the pedestrian leaves from four feet to the left of the fire hydrant. It's a straight up illegal jay walk. No question about it.

English

0

20

M. Nolan Gray 🥑@mnolangray·24 Mar

It's not a "set up" or a "trap," it's vanilla traffic enforcement along a corridor where reckless drivers regularly strike and kill pedestrians using crosswalk.

Collin Rugg@CollinRugg

NEW: The LAPD is setting up drivers by having someone walk across the street in an "unmarked crosswalk" so they can then give tickets to people who don't stop. "Recently, LAPD Van Nuys division conducted a Pedestrian Enforcement Taskforce," they shared online. The LAPD says the trap was made to "promote education" after they've "had a string of accidents that have resulted in fatal or severe injuries related to pedestrians."

English

63

55

1.2K

41.1K

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@YetiMoose @BoydSteere @mnolangray Wrong, there is Van Noord Ave

English

0

1

16

THE Yeti Moose@YetiMoose·25 Mar

@MingweiSamuel @BoydSteere @mnolangray It's a driveway t-section. I live 5 mins from there

English

0

21

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@TakingHisTime @mnolangray No one is wearing red, and the video doesn’t show a single person stepping off the sidewalk, every clip shows drivers approaching a failing to yield to pedestrians already in the crosswalk. Even if it did, pedestrian due care does not relieve driver duty of due care (CVC 21950.d)

English

0

1

46

God@TakingHisTime·25 Mar

That is not an unmarked crosswalk the ma in red is walking on. He is outside the width. He is crossing in the middle of the road. Also, pedestrians have a “duty of care” they can’t simply launch off the sidewalk into traffic (as seen here). Pedestrians also have to yield to vehicles outside of crosswalks

English

0

1

48

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@CollinRugg @Mr_Pendulum_ Yes make up something in your head and then be mad about it, haha

English

4

Collin Rugg@CollinRugg·24 Mar

@Mr_Pendulum_ There is probably a homeless guy injecting drugs and harassing people down the street but this is what they decide to spend their time doing.

English

42

21

932

33.1K

Collin Rugg@CollinRugg·24 Mar

NEW: The LAPD is setting up drivers by having someone walk across the street in an "unmarked crosswalk" so they can then give tickets to people who don't stop. "Recently, LAPD Van Nuys division conducted a Pedestrian Enforcement Taskforce," they shared online. The LAPD says the trap was made to "promote education" after they've "had a string of accidents that have resulted in fatal or severe injuries related to pedestrians."

English

1.8K

405

2.6K

1.2M

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@jasonmcminn @tetrisgm @marcjoffe @kimmaicutler BART had the highest fare box recovery rate before the pandemic, which means decreased commute ridership post pandemic has hit it harder than other agencies. By your measure, BART is bad because it was run too well, too efficiently, pre-pandemic

English

If voters spurn BART in November, you've read about some pretty dire worst-case scenarios. Rough news: They're worse. From @esksf missionlocal.org/2026/03/bart-d…

0

2

34

Jason McMinn@jasonmcminn·25 Mar

@tetrisgm @marcjoffe @kimmaicutler @tetrisgm explain further. I am intrigued.

English

4

0

2

385

Kim-Mai Cutler@kimmaicutler·24 Mar

Oh wow, shutting down BART entirely is a possibility if the sales tax measure doesn't pass.

Mission Local@MLNow

English

50

19

215

94.9K

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@WillyDiBa7 @jbillinson No, it is the extension of the sidewalk across the intersection. I.e. exactly where any reasonable person would think a crosswalk would be. This has been the case since 1931. Here is the Statutes of California (1959) when the sections were renumbered

English

13

mikchaelvratetbel@WillyDiBa7·25 Mar

@jbillinson “Unmarked crosswalk” is the craziest thing I’ve ever heard. So that’s just literally the whole road? You can walk across any part of any road in America 😂

English

3

0

7

482

Josh Billinson@jbillinson·24 Mar

LAPD is setting up drivers who narrowly avoid vehicular manslaughter

Collin Rugg@CollinRugg

NEW: The LAPD is setting up drivers by having someone walk across the street in an "unmarked crosswalk" so they can then give tickets to people who don't stop. "Recently, LAPD Van Nuys division conducted a Pedestrian Enforcement Taskforce," they shared online. The LAPD says the trap was made to "promote education" after they've "had a string of accidents that have resulted in fatal or severe injuries related to pedestrians."

English

4

8

319

23K

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@wongmjane Only if they have The Bird

English

2

37

Jane Manchun Wong@wongmjane·25 Mar

So uhh, hey my local neighbors in SF, are you excited about the Super Duper Burgers location that’s being opened in Burger King’s former location in Lower Pac Heights / Japantown?

Nikita Bier@nikitabier

Starting Thursday, we'll be updating our revenue sharing incentives to better reward the content we want on X: We will be giving more weight to impressions from your home region—to encourage content that resonates with people in your country, in neighboring countries and people who speak your language. While we appreciate everyone's opinion on American politics, we hope this will disincentivize gaming the attention of US or Japanese accounts and instead, drive diverse conversations on the platform. We invite creators to start building an audience locally. X will be a much richer community when there's relevant posts for people in all parts of the world.

English

35

5

311

47.1K

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@mnolangray And unmarked crosswalks have always been law in California, since 1931. Here is the Statutes of California (1959) when the sections were renumbered.

English

32

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@YetiMoose @BoydSteere @mnolangray You can see the intersecting road on the left. The road has sidewalks and the intersection is near 90 degrees, so it has unmarked crosswalks where the sidewalks would continue

English

0

1

21

THE Yeti Moose@YetiMoose·25 Mar

@BoydSteere @mnolangray It's not intersections this is just straight jaywalking in the middle of a block.

English

0

2

38

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@TakingHisTime @mnolangray Drivers must yield to pedestrians in marked and unmarked crosswalks, this has been the case since 1931. Here is the Statutes of California (1959) when the sections were renumbered

English

0

1

44

God@TakingHisTime·25 Mar

@mnolangray Is this crosswalk in the room with you now?

English

0

21

1.1K

Mingwei Samuel 翁明伟@MingweiSamuel·25 Mar

@wndrwhtsreel @DK3OffTheT @Shrewd1776 @CollinRugg @BeAccountable4u Wrong, it has always been the case, since 1931. Here is the Statutes of California (1959) when the sections were renumbered

English