IMAFEEISH
505 posts


@NotAFeeish @Darb_Seyah777 You follow a fraudulent faith.
English

@SylentBell That good April fool joke like also the book of morons aka Mormon cuz I a Christian let me tell u Mormon is fake church and they a devi cult
English

@ci_le_moth @_pipdid @SylentBell Gotta love how you didn't even deny hating them based off their religion. Very Christian of you lol
English

@_pipdid @SylentBell Since you brought it up, I will. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
Have a great life.
English

@ci_le_moth @SylentBell You can unfollow me for real I guess, since you guys hate us so much...
English

@SylentBell “Another testament”👇
"But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed." — Galatians 1:8
English


@SylentBell You haven't questioned "Nephi"? of Nephilim...???
Fucking Stupid, mormons.
English

@SylentBell Are you joking? What is FAV means? the book of Mormon is a garbage. that’s not the Bible! 😔😓😡 if I know what FAV means for analyze versus. I hope it’s a compare and scripture with scripture. I hope you’re calling it out. Mormons are not Christians.
English

@TigerBalladeer Solely the bible lead to 47000 Christian denominations. The Book of Mormon is a historical Gospel record of the American continent's people, and their experiences with the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The real kicker is we have a modern Prophet, who leads God's true church.
English

@NotAFeeish I don't find them amazing, I find them derivative, copying the phrases of the Bible and aping the language of the KJV when it was archaic even in the 1800s.
The text conveys the same gospel as the NT? If so, it's redundant, and you should stick with the authentic NT text.
English

Here's how a conversation between a thoughtful Trinitarian and a thoughtful Latter-day Saint always goes:
The Trinitarian brings up the Creeds. The Latter-day Saint says "I don't accept the Creeds as authoritative because they are unscriptural and unauthorized."
The Trinitarian insists they are simply restatements of truths taught in scripture. This starts the back and forth from the Bible, mainly from the New Testament.
The Trinitarian brings a verse saying, "I and my Father are one."
The Latter-day Saint explains that "oneness" of the Godhead members doesn't necessarily imply a full Trinitarian consubstantiation. After all, Jesus also said husband and wife ought to be "one." And He prayed for His disciples to be one even as He and the Father are one. Surely that doesn't mean we all become consubstantial entities in the Trinity?
Then the Trinitarian side talks about "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one."
Then the Latter-day Saint responds with "Let us create man in our own image."
Then the Trinitarian brings up "Philip, if you've seen me, you've seen the Father" and other verses.
The Latter-day Saint then brings up verses about the express likeness: "this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ," the Gethsemane prayer—"not my will, but thine, be done," the baptism of Jesus, "why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God," "the Father is greater than I," and the idea that the Father knows the timing of the Second Coming but not the Son, etc.
Then the Trinitarian responds with, "Well, He's carefully crafting His words for the people and it's the Person of the Son speaking, so in a sense it's true," and brings up "Before Abraham was, I AM," indicating Jesus is the Jehovah of the Old Testament.
And the Latter-day Saint says, "Yes, we believe that, too. But that doesn't mean He is the same as the Father." Also, what of the first, second, and third-century disciples—some of whom walked with Jesus Himself—who didn't hold a Trinitarian formulation? Were they not Christian?
And they go round and round, pulling up the Greek and the Aramaic, and both come away at the end more sure of their own positions than that the other's is the correct understanding.
At the end of the day, an honest neutral observer of this discussion knows one thing: the Trinitarian theory is not self-evident from the Bible alone. As the Harper Bible Dictionary itself states, "the formal doctrine of the Trinity as it was defined by the great church councils of the fourth and fifth centuries is not to be found in the [New Testament]." There is ample room for an intelligent person to interpret the text either way, and neither is proven correct.
The best a Trinitarian or Latter-day Saint can say about the Bible is "my position is evident to me."
But through all this back and forth, the Latter-day Saint has been debating with one hand tied behind his back. Because although we love the Bible and accept it as the word of God, we are not reliant only on the Bible. We believe God has given additional clarification on the ambiguity of His inspired but imperfectly translated earlier words in the Holy Bible.
God the Father and Jesus Christ appeared to Joseph Smith. And just as they appeared to the martyr Stephen, they appeared as two distinct Personages, with Jesus standing on the right hand of God. Then in the Book of Mormon and subsequent revelations, Jesus explicitly and directly set forth His nature, removing all ambiguity. And these truths are confirmed to us by personal revelation from God Himself.
This is not a contradiction of the Bible, just a contradiction of the Creedalist understanding of the Bible. We respect our Catholic and Protestant brothers and sisters who read the Bible through a different lens and understand the verses differently than us. Even though their understanding is opposed to what we believe is substantiated in Holy Scripture, we recognize their efforts to follow the Savior to the best of their ability and wouldn't dare call them un-Christian for what we see as a mistaken view.
And we respectfully ask others recognize the Bible is not self-evident on these matters and grant us the same grace we extend to them.

English

@RodRuiz14 @Darb_Seyah777 Agree to disagree ig. I know I follow the teachings of Jesus Christ to the best of my ability. And have seen his hand in my life. His forgiveness and love is limitless. I wouldn't be here if not for him. I don't seek to downplay your experiences with him. Why do you do so to me?

English

@NotAFeeish @Darb_Seyah777 Nope. You guys follow a counterfeit gospel. Happy Easter Christ, the 2nd Person of the Trinity, is indeed King.
English

@RodRuiz14 @Darb_Seyah777 Well thats us alright! Thanks brother! 😊 Happy Easter! Christ is King!
English

@NotAFeeish @Darb_Seyah777 I don’t care if you do. We only want thinking individuals who value truth and want to follow Christ.
English

@crusaderfidelis @jkdavis89 Here have a ton of the fruits of Joseph Smith!
youtu.be/gpVzQgUH1BU?si…
youtu.be/VziOwwL1Ca0?si…
youtu.be/kjaqgFd6J-o?si…
youtu.be/lMdAtzGIuBI?si…
youtu.be/0Hezx4Ar-5M?si…
youtu.be/S4OaTLYOclo?si…
Pictures are his Presidential campaign policies.
Happy Easter my friend! Christ is King!

YouTube

YouTube

YouTube

YouTube

YouTube

YouTube




English

@jkdavis89 1. The bible has many warnings against false prophets, you just cherry pick the one where you have the strongest case to make (still bad)
2. This particulat warning would require judging the fruits of Joseph Smith himself
English
IMAFEEISH がリツイート

Why would Jesus hate what He Himself restored?

Aaron (Disciple)@DiscipleFidei
Jesus loves Mormons, but he hates Mormonism.
English

@RodRuiz14 @Darb_Seyah777 Ok then convince me why I should believe in Catholicism then.
English

@NotAFeeish @Darb_Seyah777 Your “scientists” aren’t credible.
English

You know there are many good things I would agree with you on and with actually. But, this isn't one of them. Don't spread hate to people that don't deserve it. They just wanna be happy like the rest of us tbh. They need support negativity will only push them away.
x.com/i/status/20391…
English

@DoggoDog100 @kariwarburton Oh so true. Also gotta love how these weirdos believe in God's starbase Kolob! And worship Joseph Smith!
APRIL FOOLS!!! A HOUSE DIVIDED CANNOT STAND YOU ABSOLUTE GOOBER!!!
English

@kariwarburton The false prophet Joseph smith gains another woman for his father the Devil
English

@MucusMucous1 @TommyBoyo91 @InsaneCope Rape is objectively wrong. Beating a child to death is objectively wrong. You are natrually repulsed by the thought. If you aren't then something is deeply wrong with you.
English

@InsaneCope Ngl this genuinely pissed me off. They kill the innocent and mock them. Their own children.
English

“We don’t support these things the church has always taught. What are you going to do to retain us?”
Taylor G. Petrey@TaylorPetrey
Political polarization is having a measurable effect on the shape of LDS communities. Liberal Latter-day Saints are hurting and could use some meaningful outreach.
English

@yDYR0OHR5h13004 @Sola_GPT -700 IQ for unironically using the word "cult" to describe The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
English






























