
Robert Harrison
1.4K posts


@Mangu_baby @Aella_Girl @letclaudiatweet I am no expert of female behavior, but my understanding is that when someone’s husband is being flirtatious with another woman, that can breed jealousy and resentment towards the object of attraction from the wife, especially if it is not repelled by the recipient.
English

this is not the diplomatic move if you are a hot popular girl vulnerably approached by a nervous nerdy girl whose husband is inappropriately enamored with you.
the diplomatic move is to start subtly ice-queening the husband (but not so blatantly as to cause drama) and acting warmly towards the girl.
all other moves are open aggression, which can be strategically correct, but certainly are not “post receipts on the timeline to be vindicated” moves
so is this autism, or am I just southern and not competent in San Francisco Womanese?
Aella@Aella_Girl
@ilex_ulmus this is the entirety of that conversation.
English

@gawillstewart @conorsen Well no Mitch cost them the series for letting him start and play so many minutes
English

@Aella_Girl @letclaudiatweet It sounds like she was insecure that her husband was sexually attracted to you
English

@RobertHarrisonv @letclaudiatweet She was mean to me well before this!
English

@Aella_Girl @letclaudiatweet “Banging someone’s ex husband at an orgy as a gag” is just something that normal people will never be able to process and that’s probably a part of the dynamic here
English

some context is that holly started being really cruel about me to other people and on twitter, saying stuff along the lines of people only took me seriously cause they wanted to fuck me, etc. for quite some time before this.
from my point of view, and the way I remember things (which isn't perfect), there was a guy and his gf i was friendly to for a while, didn't know well, he taught me guidedtrack, he was a fan of my work, there was some weird stuff going on in their relationship i didnt know, i wasn't close with either of them, they lived very far away. i was just trying to be nice and stay out of it and be clear that no i was not reciprocating anything but u guys have fun.
then they divorced, over the course of a few years he moved to my city, we became friends, started working together, and over this period of time holly became increasingly mean to me for, from my perspective, no particularly good reason. i hadn't interacted with her much or tried to turn anyone against her. i thought it was projection off of her own dynamic with her ex husband. i felt pretty hurt by this cause i thought i'd been nice to her. but whatever. over a certain level of visibility some ppl just seem to kinda lose it and take out their issues on you so i ignored it idk.
Her ex did eventually bang me at an orgy, but I consider this pretty minor; it was brief, I barely remember it, and *tons* of guys I don't know well or even like that much bang me at orgies. ppl really focus on this but it was more of a gag than anythign else. I maintained that i did not want to date him and did not have sex with him in any contexts i considered meaningful.
anyway i had her blocked for a long time, she tweets this 'apology' at me with a really warped depiction of the actual conversation, and im just like. ok fuckit i am fed up. i will finally make any public response *at all* and respond with the actual text so people can see the gap between how she perceives reality and what actually happened.
I don't know how to handle this kind of thing in general. It's been happening more in my life as I have gotten more famous, usually a one-degree-removed person will start getting extremely upset with me for something I did or represent as is mediated through whatever mutual network we have, and then start really focusing in on me specificaly and going around on the timeline or in social groups telling people that i suck for reasons that I consider really warped construals of what actually happened, or referred anger from a different issue, and like. idk man. idk what the solution is here. it feels like im just going through life tryin to mind my own damn business and not start beef with anybody else, but ppl get furious at me and im just like pleaseeee leave me alone.
historically for most of these i have practiced complete non-response, but im trying out something different here. idk if it's a smart move but this will at least get me data.
English

@Arugula1190981 @onya_fartin @Jims_Beans @pooptartgav There’s a famous saying about marketing ‘half the budgeting market is useless, but nobody knows which half’
English

@RobertHarrisonv @onya_fartin @Jims_Beans @pooptartgav so do you just think every ad ever is pointless because the consumer inherently knows whats best for them already?
English

This is genius to me
Eric Krehbiel@ericgkrehbiel
Possibly the worst billboard campaign I’ve ever seen
English

@onya_fartin @Jims_Beans @pooptartgav If they were actually price sensitive then they’d already be checking Lyft mate
English

@RobertHarrisonv @Jims_Beans @pooptartgav People who use Uber to get to work, etc are absolutely price sensitive
English

@cricket_je101 @pooptartgav I agree, to that end ‘reliably cheaper’ or some such phrasing would be more effective so that uber riders that are price sensitive are encouraged to consistently check Lyft
English

@RobertHarrisonv @pooptartgav its more effective the other way round no? encouraging uber customers to check lyft?
English

@RobotChocobo @DanielSLoeb1 If mythos is as dangerous as the USG claims it is then it is very obvious that USG needs Anthropic
English

@DanielSLoeb1 USG doesn't need Anthropic but Anthropic needs USG. Hope that helps.
English


@Jims_Beans @pooptartgav People who default to uber aren’t price sensitive though, and that’s the market segment this ad is clearly trying to reach
English

@RobertHarrisonv @pooptartgav If this is an area where people default to uber then it doesn’t matter cause it’s adding lyft to the rotation
English

@unclejfranklin @Real_James_Hogg @JoyceCarolOates Yeah I mean it’s an entirely different photo and shows that the restoration took very few liberties and did a pretty fantastic job
English

this is George Bernard Shaw? looks like a 2026 actor who has been "aged" unconvincingly. does not look like the historic Shaw in most photographs I have seen.
BabelColour@StuartHumphryes
The Irish playright George Bernard Shaw, photographed 119 years ago, at the age of 51. I have cleaned and enhanced this very striking Autochrome portrait by Alvin Langdon Coburn, taken in colour in 1907 via the Lumiere brother's newly-patented colour glass-plate process.
English

@BroadAndMarket Calling it a tv timeout is better though. The players are still hydrating and resting, but the name is a little more honest
English

@Real_James_Hogg @JoyceCarolOates Which makes sense considering otherwise the years wouldn’t match
English


@alexL_E_I The fake White House facade kinda ruins it but also makes it more interesting
English


@nabeelazeez @STEFisDOPE She is quite literally not wife material that’s the entire point of the whole thing man
English

@rah_66_comanche @Maryland_Blonde @harrowthefirst1 Actually twitter became xai which led to them buying a bunch of gpus for grok which they ended up selling (leasing) to Anthropic and now makes up a very significant chunk of revenue for SpaceX
English

@Maryland_Blonde @harrowthefirst1 Yeah sorta, but Twitter is a tiny fraction of why SpaceX is considered so valuable.
English

I am filled with optimism at the fact that the world's first trillionaire was made not by hedge funds or market manipulation, but by building the infrastructure to take America to the stars.
Hunter📈🌈📊@StatisticUrban
Feels very epochal.
English

@HighyieldHarry Either fable is extremely dangerous and the broader public should not have access
Or
Fable is not actually dangerous and everyone should have access
The US Gov’ts position is simply incoherent, which is to say populist nonsense.
English

@HighyieldHarry Assume that fable is actually as dangerous as they say it is:
Why would it make sense at all to then block access for anyone who is not a US citizen?
Couldn’t a maladjusted US citizen still use this ‘extremely dangerous’ model to cause chaos and destruction?
English










