固定されたツイート
SpectrGen — ₿IP-110/acc
2.8K posts
SpectrGen — ₿IP-110/acc
@SpectrGen
Father. Veteran. C++ Senior SWE. Proof-of-work. Cells, interlinked.
参加日 Mayıs 2025
360 フォロー中409 フォロワー
SpectrGen — ₿IP-110/acc がリツイート
Giacomo is trying to play the part of the toxic maxi while running a Libre Relay node which directly feeds Chun's pool a steady supply of spam slop for that swine to mine.
Look up "controlled opposition" in the dictionary and you will find a picture of Giacomo Zucco.
English
SpectrGen — ₿IP-110/acc がリツイート
@SpectrGen @TheBoozles @MARA You need to add rejecttokens=1 to your Knots or bip110 node. It doesn't do it yet, but a future version is likely to add opnet to the token list.
English
@evoskuil @genesis21m If your rule is ‘can be faked = meaningless,’ then you’ve just declared half of empirical reality off limits. Price can be spoofed, volume can be washed, hash rate can be rented. None of that makes them meaningless. Same story here.
English
@SpectrGen @genesis21m The node stats show nothing except the individual IP addresses connected to a software application. That is in fact entirely meaningless as it can be entirely faked.
English
Your daily reminder that node existence does not imply anything about economic power. These are entirely meaningless numbers.
Bitcoin Jesus@realbtcjesus
10,000 nodes are signaling for BIP-110. Bitcoin is money. Rug the spammers.
English
@BitsagaRob I hear ZEC is looking for fiat influencers like you
English
Do not run BIP110
Do not run Knots
Do not decrease the block size
Do not increase the block size
Do not remove the segwit discount
Bitcoin is fine.
We should be thinking about privacy instead, a much more important fight IMO
English
SpectrGen — ₿IP-110/acc がリツイート
@BitcoinMotorist @satofishi This greedy and dishonest miner can't see beyond his own nose. Right now, he wants high commissions, but soon he'll have to look for a new business.
English
SpectrGen — ₿IP-110/acc がリツイート
@BeckyDominic55 @1914ad @SpectrGen It isn't working.
Look at the places that need BTC as MoE, yah know the places that have hyperinflation. Look at the node counts there.
The trade off is always at the expense of the nodes and that logic is exactly backwards
Hell even the miner centralization is because of this
English
SpectrGen — ₿IP-110/acc がリツイート
I don't know if someone has already done this, but I'd like to start a list of businesses that support BIP 110.
The main reason is so like minded people can support each other's businesses.
Please feel free to add companies in the replies:
256heat.com
Covebitcoinwallet.com
Bitcoinartmagazine.com
parman.org/parmanodl
English
@1914ad True. Luckily their opinions don't matter because they don't run nodes
English
@SpectrGen 99% of Bitcoin owners think spam is a complete nonissue
English
Bitcoiners in 2017: “Bitcoin is perfect money that will separate money and state!”
Bitcoiners in 2026: “Spam isn’t a problem for Bitcoin. Have you seen how cheap SSD drives are? Pardon me, I’m playing roulette on Bitcoin!”
English
@bitcoin_bugle @spoonmvn Popularity contests have practically no correlation to Knots/RDTS adoption on the Bitcoin network. I don't understand the point of this aside from propaganda
English
@spoonmvn This is how democracy works. If you don’t like the results, you need to vote harder, not question the institution
English
😂 Well, that’s strange…
I saw the total votes of each match up jump by a block of 500 in the last few minutes,
flipping most of the results in favor of shitcoiners.
Anyway, I’m sure it was just a glitch!
Bugle.News 📯@bitcoin_bugle
#MaxiMadness Node Region 🧵
English
@evoskuil @genesis21m ‘Not a clean proxy for economic power’ does not mean ‘entirely meaningless.’ Sybils, crawler shifts, and version rollouts can muddy individual jumps, but they do not cancel a sustained post-v30 trend toward Knots and RDTS.
English
@SpectrGen @genesis21m The point of course is that there is no way to tell the difference.
English
@Kurtis_NZ @CatoTheElder17 Centralization inevitably leads to Bitcoin's death, as it would no longer be a P2P electronic cash system. You need to do more studying and less yapping like you know what you're talking about.
English
@SpectrGen @CatoTheElder17 No, you just don't seem to be able to comprehend the distinction I'm making
English
Updated chain growth vs projected storage improvement chart using more historic input data and better modelling. #bitcoin won't die.
Worst that will happen is near term people will have to upgrade their node hardware sooner than they hoped.
English
@TheBoozles @MARA "BIP-110 DoEsN't StOp Op_NeT"
BIP-110 nodes are chillin 😎
Filters work. Run #BIP110
English
Yeah, the time for talk is over. BIP-110 is action. I don't want Datacoin, I want Bitcoin. @MARA fork off!
English
@SpectrGen @CatoTheElder17 I didn't say it wasn't. I just said it's unlikely to kill bitcoin (because that was my fear, so I looked into it and posted my findings).
English
@BTCtoOblivion @opnetbtc OP_NET couldn’t be a better advertisement for running BIP-110. They’re practically doing our work for us
English
IT SEEMS LIKE BITCOIN IS CURRENTLY BEING ATTACKED BY SCAMMER @opnetbtc
NPC bitcoiners/midwits are going to fuck around and find out why existence of shitcoin core is the existential risk for bitcoin.
BIP110 CAN'T COME SOON ENOUGH
LONG LIVE BITCOIN 🧡🧡🧡
English
@mattkratter satofishi deleted his post after we ratioed him
English
SpectrGen — ₿IP-110/acc がリツイート
@evoskuil @genesis21m The distinction is independent control. One actor running 100M nodes is one coordination point, one failure domain, and one policy switch—not 100M independent operators. Given your work on libbitcoin, this level of confusion about decentralized systems is embarrassing.
English
@SpectrGen @genesis21m It would not make any difference who it is, the behavior is identical/
English