Tim Wrede
5.1K posts
Tim Wrede がリツイート
Tim Wrede がリツイート
A rather rare album of nearly 100 pages from the USSR Ministry of Aviation Industry, dedicated to the NK-33 (11D111) rocket engine.
It contains diagrams, technical drawings, electrical schematics, and, of course, photographs.
Link:
drive.google.com/file/d/1Zvvtr7…
English
@mightbejell0 Damn what where they cooking if engine upgrades in the last year does these improvements, like FR what did they do those years before ?
English
@Evgenychern @learning_yohei Or any hobby project of farmers, know a few that do have like 40 year old cars doing these speeds
English
日本からこんにちは🇯🇵👋
ドイツ人に質問があります🇩🇪🙋
僕はこのことを聞いてびっくりしました😳
ドイツには速度制限のない高速道路があるって本当ですか？🚘
日本語
@learning_yohei @Evgenychern You would think until you drive 200 and see a car overtake you in seconds
English
Sooo @torybruno, Are we getting your famous orbital insertion accuracy graphics for this one?
English
Long term Investor approval of the less profitable projects. A lot of mars is included. Congress is so up and down in terms of funding over the years, I'm afraid we'll hit a crossroad of NASA isn't funding something.. Will the shareholders? Probably not.
Great move for anything not mars related though!
English
I'm very much not looking forward to SpaceX going public.. sigh. 🙃
English
@Truthful_ast @astro_kep @austinbarnard45 Can someone compare never tell me the odds (ntmo) flight 1&2 landings
English
@astro_kep @austinbarnard45 They have the welt bolt down things so they’ll be fine
English
On Blue Origin's third ever flight they have had a successful landing of this boosters second flight💪💪
English
@fakecarlsagan @booster_10 Yeah I do think they could do this yeah as they once said 2 landings before ship catch attempt but also V2 and V3 ships are very similar so they might just say one is enough
English
@TimWrede2 @booster_10 Is there any reason they wouldn't plan to perform a recovery on the first launch into a stable orbit? So long as they target somewhere well offshore prior to the bellyflop, there wouldn't be any significant risks.
English
It's starting to look very unlikely but I do still hope that we see the ship survive tip over on flight 12 so it can be recovered and studied ahead of catch attempts in the future.
English
@ScottLikedSLS Why not add both, tuch screens and buttons so you can have some controls on Tuch screen and on buttons for example while coasting I’d say this could be interesting
English
Not a dig as i do like that they tried something different and more experimental with Dragon, buut i think SpaceX should drop or tone back the whole 'trying to be super futuristic by being as minimal as possible' thing with their interiors now..
Astronauts clearly prefer physical buttons and controls over touchscreen controls, should be catering to Astronaut preferences not aesthetics 🤷♂️
SLS@ScottLikedSLS
Thank you Victor for confirming my physics controls and buttons are better than screens point :) Cant say it doesnt Make me worried about Starship HLS, seeing as astronauts also fsr prefer physical controls.. since HLS seemingly uses majority screen control again and a contract agreement was to allow manual control of HLS for landing (which SpaceX has been fighting NASA about)
English
@TheIshikawaRin SSTO or at least a high long taking flight path, stage-> boost back if you do that while upperstage coast towards apogee switch to upperstage do orbital insertion switch back and land or MODS
English
New Glenn is such a pretty rocket and it makes me wish we could make actually reusable first-stage boosters in Kerbal Space Program without sacrificing the second stage.
Blue Origin@blueorigin
New Glenn propellant loading is underway.
English
@theediamondman @TheIshikawaRin Yes it allows to have multiple crafts to be active the same time and on diffrent screens too
English
@TheIshikawaRin as already mentioned FMRS deals with this in a nice way though I hope KSA has stock support for it in a cooler way than auto-saves
English
English
@PebMet1 @booster_10 These metal deflector-style trenches are proven, but they are disposable. All those steel panels wear away during each launch, meaning they must be replaced for each flight. This limits your launch cadence to repair times. You need water cooling for high launch rate usage.
English
Flame trench looks great, we still have to see it survive a flight but it looks like a very successful design change so far.
RGV Aerial Photography@RGVaerialphotos
A look inside the flame trench post Booster 19 static fire
English
@CruiZe427 @booster_10 Not just cooled they have tons of small holes to push the water out and make an additional barrier of cooler gas
English
@booster_10 So those pipes are being actively cooled with water shooting thru them right?
English
@powwidgesan @Ne00ii They are different at least here in Germany I accept every name besides Pfannkuchen and donut
English
@Ne00ii Oh yesh pfannkuchen sucks ass as a name for those
I dont think the dough is the same though ill be so honest. Donuts taste vastly different lmao
English
Can we as germans pls unite against the common enemy of the English language that calls these "donuts"
ꪆৎ@fairiehaze
Strawberry jam or chocolate filled donuts?
English
@Owen_JNO @Starship_block3 Yeah it is G‘s not m/s² the boost back on V2 did like 10-15 did Elon say
English
@Starship_block3 @TimWrede2 what are these numbers?? the stack pulls more than 2 g's even on ascent
English
My flight 12 prediction:
Booster:
No accent problem
No decent problem
Ship
No accent problem
No decent problem
Why?
The booster is made for 20g acceleration and the ice problem is solved by using different tanks
The ship is mostly the V2 ship which allready proved itself
NicePixels 🚀@Starship_block3
My prediction for Flight 12: Booster: -Reasonable ascent -Nominal staging -Accurate boostback -explodes on landing due to forces Ship: -Nominal orbital insertion -Nominal Simlink deployment -Nominal deorbit burn -Extensively damaged during reentry -Makes landing burn ~10m 🎯
English