TimeandChange

I strongly disagree. I've been requesting deci-cents on golf for a long time. Deci-cents hurts top-down market makers and rewards better pricing. The game is no longer about queue position on something a square 6th grader could price because it's trading at 1c/2c. On live, yeah, it probably hurts margins for MMs pulling odds from sportsbooks. Aside from the courtsiding issue, it's very easy to price something at -9900/+4900. It's just speed and queue management. Short term maybe liquidity dips, but long run you get more competitive prices. You say recs don't care about price but a rec does care about 499/1 instead of 99/1. And your argument about taking being harder is easily solved via a configurable "slippage" feature that many orderbooks already have. If done right, it should feel no different to recs. I'll be more active in live MM now that more than 5% of the field is tradeable and the competition is about having better prices, not being first in queue at 98c laying a golfer DraftKings has at 80/1. Also, 40 million contracts sounds like a lot, but when most of that volume is taking at 1c, actual bet volume from takers is much smaller than other markets trading 40 mill.

We are about to see the gnarliest tank race in NBA history. The bottom 8 teams + the Bulls + the Bucks if they can pacify Giannis would all prefer to lose every game the rest of the season. There is no competitive integrity to be found here.

Landman is great. The ex wife and daughter scenes