Algod

Even after the typo i made i will still frame this

@CryptoZPunisher @markjeffrey waiting for weights

@markjeffrey @AlgodTrading 👀

Sounds like we need more inference from somewhere ... :)

@andyyy @grok Seems they are on a good path!

@AlgodTrading @grok Ya they have work to do to get deflationary but anticipating late 2027 or 2028

Since Novemeber of last year, near:native intents volume has been absolutely exploding and is normalizing a new level of around $500m/week. Expecting this to rise into billions per week in 2027 as the crypto bull returns and they prioritize cross-chain RWAs and tokenized equity opportunities. One of the best products on the market right now.

@daanisharif @trikcode Yes

@AlgodTrading @trikcode Is this engy you're speaking of?

switched my Claude API to Kimi yesterday it’s faster, 10x cheaper, and writes better code. i don't care if Beijing knows my db schema. it's not like my startup has users anyway.

@GokuYoppy @engyai we have state of the art cluster management and access to cheap compute

@AlgodTrading @engyai 50% off is a big cut ngl, how does that scale

Private beta for @engyai closing as we are preparing to go live if you/your company is using large amounts of inference we can cut your bill in half for majority of the models feel free to DM me

@KAPOTHEGOAT01 @FloodCapital Only $1m?

@AlgodTrading @FloodCapital Call it $1M @AlgodTrading let’s see if he’s really serious

hi @FloodCapital , as you called me 'pussygod', lets up the bet? whats your max size

And another near SOTA opensource model dropping soon If you have interest in cheap inference, feel free to check out @engyai

@AurelianofRome @beffjezos You can tariff the providers

@beffjezos You can’t tariff free software.

Ok memes, aside, I do think Dean points out a predicament we are in. He's not wrong that if there is no way to privatize some of the gains from model making, the rate of AI capex growth will inevitably slow down. China is trying to squeeze our capitalist system with this tactic. I do not think a soft regulatory risk increase around OSS is the way to go. I do think adding "import tariffs" on Chinese open source models is a much better hammer. That is, for any business running Chinese models as a service, they are taxed per token at a rate depending on model capability equivalent market price. This both protects American frontier closed labs' margins that they can reinvest in capex *and* gives an advantage to local US and allies open source models. TL;DR - Chinese token tariffs >> Regulatory uncertainty for OSS AI

@koolkrypto223 @FloodCapital My pe of 1000 was generous 😀

@FloodCapital @AlgodTrading You do know that premiums paid isn't fees paid right? They're only making 5bps on premiums (less with caps).

About to mog this fool🫵🤣, he clearly didn't get the memo, IT'S ethereum:0x0f2d719407fdbeff09d87557abb7232601fd9f29 SUMMER BABY!!!!

@0xTaiki @FloodCapital Yes

@AlgodTrading @FloodCapital Isn't this the same as when dokwon made a bet with you? Posturing to try prop up confidence in the token

Sized the bet to 200k with @FloodCapital , the protocol is not worth $250m fdv lets hope he pays out :)

@retro_doomer @FloodCapital Not easy to crime it up for 3 consecutive weeks

@AlgodTrading @FloodCapital what if he crimes it up to $250M? it really doesn't take alot to get a token that high... (didn't take a look at liquidity)

@RonXLabs This counts for every business tbh But taking rewards from subnets that do well to give to new subnets is very anti capitalism

@AlgodTrading new subnets are hard to survive though

Jacob did the right thing and corrected root prop % in the emissions equation Subnets that utilise all emissions + have revenue/profit will now receive most emission share in the network Imagine a world where Tao becomes deflationary, the flywheel would be insane

@const_reborn @WSquires If you believe research over profits, ask every subnet owner to not take any owner emissions or just a research wage You cant have the benefits of doing research while at same take making the money of a for profit company

I take @WSquires on this one

@const_reborn @WSquires 😀😀

@EthMagician @FloodCapital Consecutive means consecutive yes

@FloodCapital @AlgodTrading Plus I think you both need to clarify terms. Is it closing price? If it ever dips below 1.00 does the 3 week clock reset? It’s too vague and in the scenario it does have a massive run, there’s too many ways for your side to be voided.

Taking a $100k bet with @FloodCapital that $syn wont be over $1 for 3 consecutive weeks by Jan 1st 2027 No escrow so both our reputation on the line, easiest bet of my life

@plotarmordev Subnets turning profitable

@AlgodTrading So what's the actual mechanism making tao deflationary here? The emission share change I get, but the rest?