Chief

1.2K posts

Chief

Chief

@__chief____

Islamist.

参加日 Eylül 2023
21 フォロー中6 フォロワー
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@AsaadOfBengal @bangu_librarian @lowtierconbart3 @_Caged_ Hindustani, Hindi, and Urdu are all different names for the SAME language. Sanskritised Hindi is derived from Hindi/Urdu by removing Persian & Arabic by some sanghis ~150 years ago. This new language is now called "Hindi" and instated as the official language of India by hindus.
English
0
0
0
1
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@Eagle220468 @Thesonderous @bangu_librarian @lowtierconbart3 @_Caged_ Urdu is a just an 18th century Turkish name for Hindustani/Hindi, a millennium old language. Sanskritised Hindi invented ~150 years ago is what you're thinking about because the hindus cunningly called this new language "Hindi" and made it the official language of India.
English
0
0
0
3
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@JaiVeru12006 @bangu_librarian @lowtierconbart3 @_Caged_ it doesn't say that Urdu is a later LANGUAGE your own source literally states that Urdu is a later NAME for Hindustani/Hindi, learn to read, u hateful hindu Sanskritised Hindi - the official language of Republic of India, cunningly called "Hindi" by hindus - is a later language
English
0
0
0
4
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@OurAqsa @Rustum_0 it is not dying, but getting mixed with English in colloquial language. literature, on the other hand, is unaffected all thanks to Islamic madrasas. though non-Islamic literature is losing its quality as it gets affected by the education system and colloquial language.
English
0
0
0
2
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@McBeaner69 it is. objecting to "Urdu is mid" (clearly a hateful and/or indoctrinated laid with inferiority complex stance) is supremacism now?
English
1
0
1
46
Oliver Klozoff
Oliver Klozoff@McBeaner69·
@__chief____ It really isn’t since Islamic scholarship in the subcontinent has existed in local languages I’m not even anti-Urdu but this Urdu supremacism is just dumb especially in the modern age when Urdu has become even less relevant
English
1
0
3
115
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@Suomm0 @Jam7582 @m4naldx1 > ketchup is peak on everything I'm sorry that you think that, may Allah improve the state of your taste buds
English
1
0
1
36
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@Jam7582 @m4naldx1 😂 me personally, I would like a clarification that the ketchup is for the fries and not the shawarma...
English
2
0
3
4K
جميل
جميل@Jam7582·
@m4naldx1 I’m with white people on this one, shawarma shouldn’t be cut
English
3
1
27
20.1K
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@abeera_ehsan0 @kaleshiwasp @rorodiaryxo @nineteesgurl if u read closely u'll notice that I objected to one specific thing not to your stance in the wider discussion yes, anything other than nikah & walimah isn't part of Islam. but it can be permissible. feast given after nikah during barat can be considered (non-sunnah way) walimah
English
1
0
1
15
Wednesday 2.0
Wednesday 2.0@abeera_ehsan0·
@__chief____ @kaleshiwasp @rorodiaryxo @nineteesgurl I will end the discussion on this " Walima is arranged by only groom's side and Barat/nikah arranged by bride's side" so it cannot be seem as a Walima. Only Nikah and a Walime dinner is valid if it is arranged by groom's side.
English
2
0
0
28
s.
s.@nineteesgurl·
😭😭😭😭
s. tweet media
QME
9
5
312
33.6K
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@kaleshiwasp @abeera_ehsan0 @rorodiaryxo @nineteesgurl > "Walima" just means dinner & Salah just means "to connect". some words become terms, you cannot then literally translate them. so this notion is incorrect. walimah literally means a banquet, but in Islam it's a term denoting a feast hosted by the groom to celebrate a wedding.
English
1
0
0
24
meow (da realest)
meow (da realest)@kaleshiwasp·
@abeera_ehsan0 @rorodiaryxo @nineteesgurl "Walima" just means dinner. You dont have to call the function walima. The emphasis is on giving a DINNER. Do you think the prophet meant you should have a big wedding function like a pakistani walima 😭😭😭 he meant FEEDING people not the actial function
English
1
0
4
76
أحمد
أحمد@4hm4d_m1rza·
Me and my boys have this theory that we can just tell which people are gonna be wife beaters and honestly even on this app I can just tell from your opinions which of you incels are gonna be woman beating bums
English
21
15
508
28.5K
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@mshaq123 "the Sunnis" the insecurity OMG 🤣
English
1
0
1
470
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@mahadnaseermrj @0rion_7 @properstrange 'nowadays' people mix English with Hindi/Urdu, coz sadly our education system is in Eng. But this is completely different than the topic of discussion in every language, literature is more formal. while people speak a watered down version of it. that doesn't make it 2 languages
English
0
0
0
16
MAHAD
MAHAD@mahadnaseermrj·
@0rion_7 @__chief____ @properstrange muhajirs that came from India speak haryanvi, punjabi, bihari, bengali also, i am using phrase "Pure Urdu" to differ it from the "Spoken Urdu" that we spoke nowadays... if you are urdu spoken then try to read any old urdu novel or afsana, you will get to know the diff...
English
1
0
0
18
irraj
irraj@properstrange·
seeing lyrics for urdu songs on spotify in sanskrit script disgusts me
English
57
109
1.6K
58.3K
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@mahadnaseermrj @0rion_7 @properstrange are u not comprehending? of course Hindustani/Urdu/hindi and Sanskritised Hindi are two different languages. That's why I gave u a history lesson on actual Hindi shuddh is not a word in Hindi. This is sanskritised Hindi u're talking about, there's nothing 'pure' about this lang
English
0
0
0
9
MAHAD
MAHAD@mahadnaseermrj·
@__chief____ @0rion_7 @properstrange well, lemme give an example ! Lets take the word Pure itself !... In Urdu, we use word 'khalis' for pure but in hindi, we use word 'shud' for pure ! but, people knows both of the words coz both are languages of the subcontinent BUT, as you can see two diff word, two diff lang...
English
1
0
0
17
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@mahadnaseermrj @0rion_7 @properstrange this "pure hindi" is pure propaganda by India to give credibility to Sanskritised "Hindi". and pakistanis play right into this, knowingly, because they get to keep "Urdu" for themselves. Hindustani (Hindi-Urdu) is a mixture of Prakritik, Persian and Arabic. now, define "pure"
English
1
0
0
11
MAHAD
MAHAD@mahadnaseermrj·
@__chief____ @0rion_7 @properstrange yes, spoken urdu and spoken hindi are same, that is caused by people of sub-continent... but, pure urdu and pure hindi are two diff languages, as i said above !,
English
2
0
0
25
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@abimikaeel "Wahhabi" is not a name of a sect, it's a pejorative. popularised by westerners, and now, bread and butter of barelvis. Al-Wahhab is Allah's name BTW. so when barelvis use "wahhabi" as an insult, they're actually insulting Allah. sad thing is many of them know about this.
English
3
0
19
572
Abi Mikaeel
Abi Mikaeel@abimikaeel·
Was Imam Ahmad a Wahabbi? How about Ibn Taymiyyah? Maybe Ibn al-Qayyim? What about Al-Barbahari? They all came before Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab so make it make sense lol
English
14
16
147
7.1K
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@mahadnaseermrj @0rion_7 @properstrange Urdu and [Spoken] Hindi are the same language. Official or 'Sanskritised' Hindi is a new (~150yo), completely different language that no one speaks. The states of Ind and Pak deliberately created this conflation/confusion of names in order to have a separate national identities
English
1
0
1
27
MAHAD
MAHAD@mahadnaseermrj·
@0rion_7 @properstrange urdu and hindi are two diff languages with diff history and diff way of formation. for convenience, people of sub-continent have mixed these two and added a lot of words of english e.g. radio, television, etc...! if you listen to pure urdu and pure hindi, you will get the diff !
English
4
0
4
384
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@bas3dp4ki and btw you said "odds" in your original tweet odds are a different concept than probability or fractions. probability of 'n to m' odds = n/(n+m) in your 1 to 0 odds, this becomes p = 1/(1+0) = 1 a perfect probability of 1 denoting absolute certainty!
English
0
0
0
4
Chief
Chief@__chief____·
@bas3dp4ki it is not 1/0 is (undefined) infinity 1/1 is 1 read again what I wrote u said "1 in 0", so that's more than 100% (i.e. 1/1) probability of occurrence. which is against the laws of nature AND probability theory. but rhetorically it may imply certainty beyond absolute certainty!
English
1
0
0
5

ディスカバー

@AsaadOfBengal @bangu_librarian @lowtierconbart3 @_Caged_ @Eagle220468 @Thesonderous @JaiVeru12006 @OurAqsa