😄

1K posts

😄 banner
😄

😄

@m_azzd

Scotland 参加日 Mart 2021
711 フォロー中32 フォロワー
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@ChrisHasla73748 That’s exactly what universal credit should be used for. The issue is it’s not. And life being difficult on 12k doesn’t make life on 50k any easier. Hope things get better for you soon mate!
English
0
0
1
50
Paul Davis
Paul Davis@ChrisHasla73748·
I'm sick and tired of hearing about people moaning that they can't manage on 50k a year due to the cost of living crisis. Try living off 12k a year on universal credit. I'm not on it by choice btw,I was like many others that unfortunately lost their job.
English
128
34
691
69.4K
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@jonnyshort @JamesW1906 @TerraOrBust Restaurant owner here, staffing is the highest cost for hospitality businesses. If those costs increased another 25%, 99% of them would fail in their current form. A well run efficient hospitality business has single digit profit margins these days.
English
0
0
0
14
jonny short
jonny short@jonnyshort·
@JamesW1906 @TerraOrBust Do people I’m replying to run a hospitality business? I’m sure shelling minimum wage out is an issue but surely not the fundamental one.
English
2
0
0
91
Gully Foyle #UKTrade
Gully Foyle #UKTrade@TerraOrBust·
This is a really good explanation. Ultimately you need to add more value per hour to a business, than you cost per hour to employ, for a business to bother employing you. Someone on £15 an hour costs around £22-23 an hour to the business to employ.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
26
31
245
14.2K
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@PhilipProudfoot @JamesMainw41767 Genuinely interested what you think should happen, these businesses shut down. Millions unemployed, tax revenues plummet, 100s of 1000s business close. You think the country would be a better place then?
English
0
0
1
45
Philip Proudfoot
Philip Proudfoot@PhilipProudfoot·
@JamesMainw41767 I don’t think a small business is viable if it can’t afford to pay its workers enough to live on. I don’t see anything you’ve said here that disproves my point?
English
203
5
311
17.6K
Philip Proudfoot
Philip Proudfoot@PhilipProudfoot·
Don’t particularly feel sorry for any business owner whose enterprise is only viable because they pay poverty wages.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
1.4K
652
6.5K
315.2K
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@NiallFraser8 How does one get to be an adult and have such fundamental misunderstandings of how the world works.
English
0
0
4
135
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@bbcdebatenight Reality just doesn’t ever make an appearance in these people’s thought process. Madness.
English
1
0
0
298
BBC Debate Night
BBC Debate Night@bbcdebatenight·
"Your generation face this problem because we’re part of a system... it only works for a small number of super rich elites" The SNP's Jack Middleton says society “doesn’t work” for young people, pledging help towards home deposits and rent caps #bbcdn
English
84
80
218
27K
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@MacRumors I was hoping to buy one in the next 5-10 years when the price, battery life and weight got to an acceptable point! Hopefully they revisit when the tech allows - it’s got awesome potential!
English
0
0
0
1.2K
Benjamin
Benjamin@FleetsAndTweets·
Hey @Morrisons please stop selling @LaFamigliaRana foods. I needed something quick for dinner so I bought this. The box photo of the food is 100% false advertising. 3 tiny cubes of beef. This is just oxtail soup with pasta.
Benjamin tweet mediaBenjamin tweet media
English
60
28
707
288.2K
😄 がリツイート
Bilal Farooqui
Bilal Farooqui@bilalfarooqui·
SpaceX just tied Elon Musk’s comp to achieving a $7.5T market cap and building a 1M person colony on Mars A Delaware judge 20 years from now: this was really easy to do and we will take his comp back
English
92
344
11.3K
315.6K
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@scottishgreens He’s paid more tax than your leadership could in 1000 lifetimes. Bunch of spongers.
English
0
0
23
235
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@Malcolm_Offord The entire exchange with @Ross_Greer was eye opening. They don’t want success for the Scottish people as an absolute core belief. It’s something to be demonised and discouraged. Taking from the system is more virtuous, in their eyes, than paying in.
English
0
0
2
252
Felis Silvestris Grampia
@m_azzd @JimSpenceDundee A fettered capitalism with properly taxed corporations and high wealth individuals. A soft socialism perhaps, but mixed. All vital services should be state-owned imho. Privatisation has been a disaster in the UK, all of it is failing, too expensive or both.
English
1
0
0
33
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@FGrampia @JimSpenceDundee It also ignores the fact that capitalism is the greatest poverty eradicator in human history. What alternative system do you suggest?
English
1
0
0
20
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@FGrampia @JimSpenceDundee This article does not suggest that inequality causes hardship and environmental damage. It is saying it is a symptom of capitalism, along with haddship and environmental damage.
English
2
0
0
22
Felis Silvestris Grampia
@JimSpenceDundee Inequality is increasing, we should be decreasing it instead. It causes hardship and environmental damage. The richest have too much, the poorest not enough. Tax loopholes should be closed and everyone should pay their fair share without avoiding tax. That doesn't happen. Simple.
English
2
0
1
449
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@DMScotPol Not everyone in Scotland hates aspiration, success and contribution.
English
0
0
5
125
Tom Gordon
Tom Gordon@DMScotPol·
Reform UK Scotland leader Malcolm Offord does his man-of-the-people bit by declaring he has 'six houses, five cars and six boats' on #STVdebate. Novel approach
English
130
41
203
20.4K
😄 がリツイート
😄
😄@m_azzd·
@Dennynews Utterly incredible! Contributed more to the country than the other candidates would manage in 100 lifetimes. Could be on a beach with a pina colada and yet he wants to serve his country further. Hats off to the man.
English
0
0
22
917
Chris McCall
Chris McCall@Dennynews·
Malcolm Offord tells the STV debate he owns "six houses, five cars and six boats". He adds: "I've paid £45 million in tax... I don't say this to boast". Incredible.
English
152
33
445
102.5K
😄 がリツイート
Brivael
Brivael@brivael·
Hello Julia, sans aucune ironie, c'est top que tu prennes le temps de te renseigner. Mais le problème quand on lit Marx aujourd'hui, c'est qu'on prend pour acquis sa prémisse de départ, alors qu'elle a été démontée scientifiquement il y a plus de 150 ans. Toute la pensée de Marx repose sur la théorie de la valeur-travail. L'idée que la valeur d'un bien vient de la quantité de travail nécessaire pour le produire. Si tu acceptes cette prémisse, alors oui, tout son raisonnement tient. Le capitaliste "vole" la plus-value du travailleur, l'exploitation est mathématique, la révolution est inévitable. Sauf qu'en 1871, trois économistes (Menger en Autriche, Jevons en Angleterre, Walras en Suisse) découvrent indépendamment la même chose : la valeur n'est pas objective, elle est subjective et marginale. Un verre d'eau dans le désert vaut une fortune. Le même verre à côté d'une rivière ne vaut rien. Le travail incorporé est identique. Donc le travail ne détermine pas la valeur. C'est le consommateur qui valorise un bien selon son utilité marginale dans un contexte donné. Exemple concret : tu peux passer 1000 heures à tricoter un pull moche que personne ne veut. Selon Marx, ce pull a énormément de valeur (beaucoup de travail incorporé). Selon la réalité, il ne vaut rien. Parce que personne n'en veut. À l'inverse, Bernard Arnault crée des milliards de valeur non pas parce qu'il "exploite" mais parce qu'il a su anticiper et organiser des désirs humains à grande échelle. La valeur est créée par la coordination, pas extraite par le vol. Cette découverte (la révolution marginaliste) a invalidé tout l'édifice marxiste. Pas pour des raisons idéologiques, pour des raisons scientifiques. C'est pour ça que plus aucun département d'économie sérieux au monde n'enseigne Marx comme un cadre d'analyse valide. On l'enseigne en histoire de la pensée. Maintenant, le truc important. Si ton intention en lisant Marx c'est d'aider les pauvres (c'est une intention noble), alors tu vas être surprise par ce qui suit. Regarde les chiffres de la Banque mondiale. En 1820, 90% de l'humanité vivait dans l'extrême pauvreté. Aujourd'hui, moins de 9%. Cette chute historique ne s'est PAS produite dans les pays qui ont appliqué Marx. Elle s'est produite dans les pays qui ont libéralisé leur économie. Chine post-1978, Vietnam post-1986, Inde post-1991, Pologne post-1989. À chaque fois qu'un pays libéralise, des centaines de millions de gens sortent de la pauvreté en une génération. À chaque fois qu'un pays applique Marx (URSS, Cambodge, Corée du Nord, Venezuela), c'est la famine et les goulags. Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est l'expérience la plus massive jamais menée en sciences sociales. Plusieurs milliards de cobayes humains, sur un siècle. Donc paradoxalement, si tu aimes vraiment les pauvres, la position la plus cohérente n'est pas d'être marxiste. C'est d'être pour la liberté économique. Parce que c'est empiriquement la seule chose qui a jamais sorti massivement les gens de la misère. Pour creuser, je te recommande trois lectures qui vont changer ta vision : "La Loi" de Frédéric Bastiat (court, lumineux, gratuit en ligne) "La Route de la Servitude" de Hayek "Économie en une leçon" de Henry Hazlitt Bonne lecture, et vraiment chapeau de chercher à comprendre plutôt que de rester dans tes certitudes. C'est rare.
Julia ひ@lifeimitatlife

Depuis tout à l'heure je me renseigne sur les idées de Karl Marx sincèrement je n'arrive pas à comprendre comment on peut être pour le capitalisme et même plus généralement être de droite

Français
1.5K
11.1K
48.8K
3.2M
Hoping humanity prevails
@CptHastings1916 No reason to wait to call out an obvious wrong. Theres no reason for MPs to drink in the workplace. No others professions can. And more so, no reason for taxpayers to subsidise the booze. There’s plenty of pubs and bars in Westminster where the MPs can go to
English
1
0
1
58