James

24.8K posts

James banner
James

James

@JamesW1906

Fought the good fight against Brexit. Still think it’s a mistake but accept we can’t stop it now. We will be back someday.

London Katılım Mayıs 2011
905 Takip Edilen381 Takipçiler
James
James@JamesW1906·
@bubbotron3000 @Alonso_GD If the tax gains outweighed the losses (which I highly doubt), then it wouldn’t be running at a loss (for him)
English
1
0
0
59
Bubbotron3000
Bubbotron3000@bubbotron3000·
@JamesW1906 @Alonso_GD If it means he can use legal tax avoidance practices within the business, it could very well still be lucrative to run it at “a loss”.
English
1
0
0
44
Alonso Gurmendi
Alonso Gurmendi@Alonso_GD·
Sounds like his coffee shop actually can afford a £15 wage
Alonso Gurmendi tweet media
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
346
1.9K
27.1K
593.3K
James
James@JamesW1906·
@bubbotron3000 @Alonso_GD I’m not defending or attacking him. I was challenging the idea that rich business owners will fund loss-making businesses or that all or even most coffee shop owners would be rich enough to do so even if they wanted to.
English
1
0
2
86
Bubbotron3000
Bubbotron3000@bubbotron3000·
@JamesW1906 @Alonso_GD No, he absolutely isn’t. But he’s also not going to be running one to break even. So before you leap to his defence, ask yourself why he’s running it at all. What is he getting out of it. The answer is pretty obvious, and it’s not because he’s a good person.
English
3
0
15
226
James
James@JamesW1906·
@abbe_farria @Alonso_GD That same logic could be used to justify any level of NMW, no matter how high. There’s a point where the costs of an increase outweigh the benefits. Question is where that point is. Suggesting we can just increase it by 18% with no adverse effects is naive at best.
English
0
0
1
60
giza tororo
giza tororo@abbe_farria·
@JamesW1906 @Alonso_GD a business model that has a reliance on exploitative labor practices and built on underpaying staff is generally not sustainable in the long term anyway
English
1
0
6
139
James
James@JamesW1906·
@WhatKteaDidNext @beesley_cathy Nowhere did I say it’s a ‘good salary’. I said it wasn’t a starvation wage. You’re so busy with your insults and wrong assumptions, you haven’t bothered to read what I’ve said. So v little point continuing this discussion.
English
1
0
0
44
What Ktea Did Next
What Ktea Did Next@WhatKteaDidNext·
@JamesW1906 @beesley_cathy You for sure are middle / upper class and if not a boomer over the age 45 nobody that’s working class thinks £25k is a good salary..
English
1
0
0
33
Cathy Beesley
Cathy Beesley@beesley_cathy·
Peter does not live on the minimum wage. He relies on Universal Credit to top up his workers’ wages to a survivable level so he is nicely off. We pay for people like Peter to run businesses while paying starvation wages.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
543
383
3.3K
137.7K
James
James@JamesW1906·
@WhatKteaDidNext @beesley_cathy People are living on that. I’m not saying it’s a life of luxury but suggesting it is a starvation wage is just not accurate.
English
2
0
0
40
James
James@JamesW1906·
@WhatKteaDidNext @beesley_cathy So £12.71 is a diabolical wage but £15 is a fair wage? If you think we can just decree higher wages without any regard to whether businesses can afford them you’re the one living on another planet.
English
1
0
1
60
What Ktea Did Next
What Ktea Did Next@WhatKteaDidNext·
@JamesW1906 @beesley_cathy It is a starvation wage for a single person in the UK absolutely diabolical wage with the current cost of living what planet you on James
English
1
0
0
66
James
James@JamesW1906·
@seanzjay @beesley_cathy How do you know what I earn? You realise millions of people currently live on this or slightly more and aren’t close to starving.
English
0
0
0
79
James
James@JamesW1906·
@jonnyshort @TerraOrBust Yes for sure. And that makes it even harder to absorb wage increases. Green policy doesn’t engage with that complexity.
English
0
0
2
50
Gully Foyle #UKTrade
Gully Foyle #UKTrade@TerraOrBust·
This is a really good explanation. Ultimately you need to add more value per hour to a business, than you cost per hour to employ, for a business to bother employing you. Someone on £15 an hour costs around £22-23 an hour to the business to employ.
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
26
31
252
14.4K
James
James@JamesW1906·
@jonnyshort @TerraOrBust OP quoted a coffee shop owner. Wages are surely a significant cost for any business, especially hospitality. They operate on low margins. They can’t absorb continued significant rises in NMW without raising prices (thereby adding to inflation) or going out of business.
English
1
0
4
65
jonny short
jonny short@jonnyshort·
@JamesW1906 @TerraOrBust Do people I’m replying to run a hospitality business? I’m sure shelling minimum wage out is an issue but surely not the fundamental one.
English
2
0
0
93
James
James@JamesW1906·
@jonnyshort @TerraOrBust If people running hospitality businesses are telling you there’s an issue, do you think it’s more likely they’re right or that you understand their business better than they do?
English
2
0
3
97
jonny short
jonny short@jonnyshort·
@TerraOrBust But the weird thing about coffee shops is if you’re busy every employee can add about £15 every 2 minutes I reckon. It’s easy to work out therefore wages costs surely aren’t the main problem. Surely it’s a combination of overall costs and not enough customers.
English
3
0
0
360
James
James@JamesW1906·
@adzz_s @JamieJackson___ Yes much of the media will want to take him down and for those who want to take him down it helps that he’s an opportunist woefully out of his depth. He doesn’t have the depth or talent to withstand the scrutiny coming his way.
English
0
0
0
412
adam シ🫀
adam シ🫀@adzz_s·
we actually can’t let the media take down Zack Polanski the way they did to Corbyn. you can really tell they’re panicking and it shows the Green Party are coming 💚
English
544
1.4K
11.2K
110.4K
James
James@JamesW1906·
@BWoodzy99 Leaving aside that no one should have a birthright to a seat in Parliament, how do you think their ancestors got their seats? Political cronyism. It’s just that time has legitimised it.
English
0
0
4
215
James
James@JamesW1906·
@TomK_Brit1993 @PolitlcsUK @FT We can point to hostile and insulting actions and comments made by Trump towards the U.K. What do you think Starmer has (not) said or (not) done that has put strain on the relationship?
English
1
0
3
244
Thomas King
Thomas King@TomK_Brit1993·
I think much of this reflects the fact that the President of the United States has little regard for Keir Starmer. I’m no great fan of Donald Trump and would call him narcissistic, but Starmer comes across as deeply arrogant. In my view, he’s the one putting strain on the special relationship.
English
20
2
19
8.3K
Politics UK
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK·
🚨 BREAKING: The new UK ambassador to the US, Christian Turner, privately said that the US "special relationship" is with Israel, not the UK The leak risks overshadowing the King's state visit [@FT]
English
506
1.8K
8.9K
754.7K
James
James@JamesW1906·
@patomolina They were never yours. They have never been inhabited by Argentinians. They are inhabited by people who have overwhelmingly voted not to be part of Argentina. The fact they are geographically closer to Argentina than to the UK doesn’t override that.
English
0
0
0
36
Pato Molina
Pato Molina@patomolina·
Los británicos no paran de hablar de las Islas Malvinas en esta red social. Están desesperados. Los argentinos tenemos que aprovechar este momento para insistir en su recuperación, de forma pacífica y por la vía diplomática, jamás a través de las armas. Más allá de nuestro legítimo e imprescriptible derecho de soberanía sobre las islas, los isleños tienen que entender que les conviene integrarse a nuestro país. La conectividad de las islas con el mundo depende casi enteramente de un vuelo semanal vía Santiago de Chile o de un vuelo militar larguísimo a través de la Isla Ascensión. Con el continente a 600 km (la distancia de Buenos Aires a Córdoba) tendrían acceso rápido y barato a atención médica compleja, educación universitaria, bienes de consumo a precios razonables y posibilidades de turismo (en 3 horas podrían estar tomándose un buen malbec con vista a la cordillera en Mendoza, por poner solo un ejemplo) Se normalizarían de inmediato las relaciones con todos sus vecinos sudamericanos, abriéndose a todo tipo de cooperación regional. La Constitución Argentina explicita el respeto al modo de vida de los habitantes de las Islas. Hay garantías de preservación del idioma inglés, sistema educativo propio, instituciones locales, derechos de propiedad, representación política y hasta doble ciudadanía. En Londres jamás les importaron. Los argentinos amamos las Islas Malvinas. Es ahora.
Pato Molina tweet media
Español
329
165
1.1K
35.3K
James
James@JamesW1906·
@LumilagroArg Argentina itself is a country built on colonisation and its claim for the Falklands is descended from a Spanish colonial claim.
English
0
0
0
25
Lumilagro Oficial
Lumilagro Oficial@LumilagroArg·
El principio de autodeterminación de los pueblos no aplica cuando se trata de una población implantada por la potencia ocupante tras una usurpación militar en 1833. Las Naciones Unidas reconocen que hay una disputa de soberanía, no un caso de libre determinación. La historia y el derecho internacional no se borran. Las Malvinas son argentinas.
ACuser38677🇬🇧🇪🇺@acuset857

The Falklands are British, and will remain British, the population of the Falklands want to be British, and we fought a war for them because they are British, we still have a military presence there of 4 typhoon jets, Sky Sabre air defence and over 1000 military personnel. 🇬🇧🇫🇰

Español
132
844
6.3K
98.2K
Lars Kleemann-Andersen
Lars Kleemann-Andersen@kleemann397861·
You can say that, but it still misses the bigger point. Why do European countries think they have a lasting right to territories on the other side of the world? That mindset belongs to another era. Europe was once the center of the world. It is not anymore. This should be about cooperation and modern partnerships, not holding on to distant territories as if nothing has changed.
English
31
0
4
3.9K
James
James@JamesW1906·
@ianbremmer They have never been Argentinian, they were unpopulated when discovered and the local population has overwhelmingly voted to remain British. The argument for Argentina is that they’re closer to Argentina than the UK.
English
0
0
4
330
ian bremmer
ian bremmer@ianbremmer·
at least with the falklands there’s an argument. unlike, say, greenland.
English
92
16
309
54.6K