Post

Kintsugi Tech
Kintsugi Tech@kintsugi_tech·
Cosmos Hub proposal #848 167,000~ accounts voted, but how many of those are dust accounts or bots? We exported some data from our nodes, and these are the unfiltered results YES: 95.63% (160,379 accounts) NO: 3.48% (5,843 accounts) ABSTAIN: 0.63% (1,049 accounts) VETO: 0.26% (436 accounts) As you can see, vast majority of the accounts voted YES 🤯 Let's now apply some filters. Here is the same data, but with a delegation amount of more than 1 ATOM YES: 78.79% (24,576 accounts) NO: 16.64% (5,190 accounts) ABSTAIN: 3.23% (1,006 accounts) VETO: 1.35% (420 accounts) Even filtering 136,423 dust accounts, majority of the wallets are still voting for YES 🚀 Let's try now with a 5 ATOM filter. YES: 77.89% (22,573 accounts) NO: 17.30% (5,014 accounts) ABSTAIN: 3.38% (980 accounts) VETO: 1.43% (414 accounts) Results don't change too much, showing a significant win for the YES option. The proposal is currently not passing, since what matters is the stake amount and not the account count, but we think the data is interesting. Finally, let's export the top 3 voters by stake amount of each vote option YES cosmos1lt83tymrlkcg7jtfrzv5370z9uthttpvhf4jd7 (~1,462,681.00 ATOMs) cosmos1grgelyng2v6v3t8z87wu3sxgt9m5s03xvslewd (~1,190,007.00 ATOMs) cosmos1sregzcxh7aagzndr462v9mg42sn5qp6f7cugme (~665,062.90 ATOMs) NO cosmos14lultfckehtszvzw4ehu0apvsr77afvyhgqhwh (~9,404,337.00 ATOMs) cosmos13gyfa66nnvanyn8muck3jzm8srtlq3tz32xasy (~730,073.00 ATOMs) cosmos1ljfjvdg0hps4ysqtckmx87w3hrwv54kn92waqr (~215,810.40 ATOMs) NO WITH VETO cosmos15hmqrc245kryaehxlch7scl9d9znxa58qkpjet (~9,366,343.00 ATOMs) cosmos1xmq9y92td477qs6c6jn5z8mgd4s5dpp0d65efj (~400,000.43 ATOMs) cosmos1f0zwrlfjjl8twrsyxv22p8jdqtym9njaksfs2y (~223,057.30 ATOMs) ABSTAIN cosmos19df8xjykgkxh7ywc4uax5f52vqnfsz8t7st64e (~153,801.87 ATOMs) cosmos1xym2qygmr9vanpa0m7ndk3n0qxgey3ff8vscct (~100,000.00 ATOMs) cosmos1sjllsnramtg3ewxqwwrwjxfgc4n4ef9u0tvx7u (~90,000.00 ATOMs) Disclaimer on the data: Votes snapshot has been exported yesterday (November 24th), and delegations amounts are updated to the same date. In reality, every proposal has a snapshot of delegation amount when is created so there might be some slight changes on the amounts. Raw votes data can be downloaded here: ipfs.io/ipfs/QmZA3Mp9t…
English
6
14
57
13.8K
Deivy₿
Deivy₿@DeivyB6·
@kintsugi_tech Is literally how this should be, people with dust amounts should not decide the future of a whole chain. This is voting power, not a presidential election where everyone cast one vote. If someone want to have more voting power, JUST BUY MORE ATOM
English
2
0
0
118
Syed C | range.org
Syed C | range.org@syedchoudhury·
@kintsugi_tech Goes to show the proof of stake is working as intended. Our ecosystem's dashboard confused PoS to mean one-wallet-one-vote...that was never intended to be the case for PoS
English
0
0
9
924
niels
niels@hoho_yo·
@kintsugi_tech Tried to build a small page to visualize this data dynamically for governance props in cosmos. Sadly it seems there are too many queries necessary to get the balances of voting wallets. :( Therefore thank you for the information!
English
1
0
2
518
Paylaş