Angel Velescu

@euphemey That's true, but it still doesn't mean you get to kill the kid :))

As a man, you do not have rights around pregnancy because you cannot get pregnant. Your reproductive role is ejaculating & you have every right to choose whether and where you do that....have some self accountability!

@Blacksword011 And yet you'll still support importing the men who create those conditions while demonizing those who fight for the right of life for innocents..

@rePro_Truth Great, so why are you in this conversation?

@AngelVelescu I've never had an abortion. Stop being weird.

Autonomy is the right to make decisions about what happens to and within your own body, without coercion, force, or violence. It's the reason I can't give you a colonascopy or a prostate exam *without your consent.

@rePro_Truth Great.

@AngelVelescu I've never had an abortion, nor would I personally choose to have one.

@rePro_Truth @redherringdraws Doesn't negate the fact that the fetus is still a different human being from the mother, it only enforces the fact that biology itself renders the mother responsible for the life of that different human being. And if your response to that is killing it then you're a monster.

@AngelVelescu @redherringdraws You hold the Containment View of pregnancy which, while still culturally pervasive, is outdated. Individual genetic coding doesn't alter the fact that an embryo/fetus is materially, spatially, physiologically, homeostatically, immunologically integrated into a pregnant person.

@TheSkepticWiz Boy oh boy, i wish i could be as intellectually consistent as modern atheists are. Unfortunately, i am aware that evidence and reason can be used to establish the trustworthiness of literally all of human history.

@Perro_Felix @cinj216 @Provokethoughtz So you think the post was just talking about a parent answering his or her child with the fact that yes, homosexuality exists? Are you retarded? :))

@AngelVelescu @cinj216 @Provokethoughtz

@Provokethoughtz Nobody said they do, they do it for the settlement money or for the payment they get for just making the accusation.

@rePro_Truth Cause if that's what you're describing, unless you were raped, you are the one who put that human inside you. And then subsequently decided that you don't want to deal with the result of your own willing actions and as such went on and killed the life you created.

@AngelVelescu Uh, I sure as sh*t didn't put anyone inside me. And I am not obligated to be someone else's damn life support machine.

@KinaCatGirl Tall, short, pretty, strong those are physical descriptors and they each mean something. Same as trans, it means you're not the thing that comes after it.

Trans women are women

@redherringdraws @rePro_Truth Because the name of the author hints towards the identity of the author and as such hints towards the ideological drive behind the piece. Jews started the normalization of abortion in an effort to cull the reproduction of non-jews.

@AngelVelescu @rePro_Truth You're rejecting reading it based on the name of the author? Why?

@redherringdraws @rePro_Truth There is if your dependence on that person is due to that person's actions and in the context of human reproduction. You're sterilizing the context so wildly just to justify the killing of innocent humans, but those humans didn't jump in the woman, the woman put them there.

@AngelVelescu @rePro_Truth There is no right to use someone's body for survival. It's worth a read as it goes into detail about cases, which is difficult to do here in a character limited environment. It's also not just about abortion. Abortion bans harm and kill women, just with plausible deniability.

@redherringdraws @rePro_Truth And what you call separate or not is irrelevant. It's objectively true that it's a separate being.

@AngelVelescu @rePro_Truth The fetus is inside someone connected by a physical umbilical cord. I wouldn't call that separate, especially when laws impact women. In practice abortion bans result in increased harm and death to women. Claiming "women have a right to life too" comes off as lip service.

@redherringdraws @rePro_Truth In practice i don't care about individual malpractice cases which can just as well happen without abortion bans. The fact is that there is no push against women's right to life, only for the right to life of the lives which those women create.

@redherringdraws @rePro_Truth We don't need a legal case to discuss and indisputable truth, which is that a fetus is a living human being distinct from the mother and as such is entitled to the same rights as the mother, including the right not to be murdered.

@AngelVelescu @rePro_Truth This is long, but might be worth your time to read: Of Gametes and Guardians: The Impropriety of Appointing Guardians Ad Litem for Fetuses and Embryos digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/cgi/viewconten…

@redherringdraws @rePro_Truth The only hypocrisy is claiming that the woman's "right to life" extends to the point where she's allowed to end another human's life even when hers is in no way in jeopardy.

@AngelVelescu @rePro_Truth The fetus isn't separate, that's why someone has to be pregnant. The notion that a fetus has its own body with separate legal rights is a pretext for 3rd party control. "Right to life" is a phrase used to support abortion bans; I'm pointing out the hypocrisy here.

@Perro_Felix @cinj216 @Provokethoughtz If you equate teaching children about reproduction with telling them the intricacies of fucking the hole meant for defecation then you might just be a perverted pedophile.

@AngelVelescu @cinj216 @Provokethoughtz If you equate talk about sexual orientation with sex talk it's you who's 'either too stupid to be a part of such conversations or just straight up a pedophile.'