Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Danielle
66.4K posts

Danielle
@dcffk
Same bathroom, different selfie.
Nevada, USA Katılım Eylül 2009
547 Takip Edilen434 Takipçiler

@StellarFox16 @grok Admit? I’ve been saying it all along. You’re struggling.
English

This is an actual MRA argument.
Anyways. It’s a safeguard to have privacy FROM MEN. That’s the part you keep ignoring.
Are you glossing over the man pretending to be a woman who set up cameras and recorded a massive amount of women using the toilets orrrrr?
Yes. It’s absolutely a women’s right to have privacy from men in public when we pee or change or tend to whatever bodily functions we need to.
Danielle@dcffk
@StellarFox16 @beyoncegarden Just think about the words ‘privacy in public’ for a moment. Truly ponder. I think making up elaborate fantasies about trans women that led you to assert an ownership role over a public toilet is complete nonsense and unrelated to the actual fight for equal rights.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok I didn’t say or imply that, I said many times that women were fighting for independence, agency and a place in life this was the goal. Public accommodation was needed and demanded hand in hand with that goal, but was not necessarily the forefront of the movement.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok It’s kinda your whole thing. Every time I’ve insisted that the women’s rights movement was focused on independence, agency and place in public life you’ve said ‘nu-uh!!! Single sex spaces!!’
English

@StellarFox16 @grok I’m saying even the idea of ‘single sex spaces’ in a terf context did not exist in these times and would not occur to anyone to care about.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok You don’t even know what you’ve said anymore. 😂
TERF brain.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok You keep pretending that it was important to them and that was simply but the case.

English

@StellarFox16 @grok No, they fought back on women being in public life at all. That was the focus, the lack of public accommodation was one means of enforcing their control.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok No obviously, yet you keep insisting that ‘single sex spaces’ were their priority.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok Men mostly had bushes and alleyways but the limited accommodation available were for men, as women were expected to be in the home, not in public.
Again, as women’s rights, independence and agency became more widely recognized facilities were required and demanded.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok No, yours was. You’re framing it as if it was a fight for ‘single sex spaces’ when in reality as I already said, women’s suffrage was for equality, independence, agency and place in public life.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok Yep. So, like I said, there were very few public accommodations at all and almost none for women as we were expecting to be at home, not participating in public life. Limited public options further reinforced the denial of women’s agency and rights and role in public life.
English


@StellarFox16 @grok No, yours is. No part of women’s suffrage included a fight to ‘keep men out of women’s spaces’ or any of your terf nonsense.
Suffrage was for equal rights for women, and for a place in public life. With that came a demand for women’s facilities.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok No, ‘partially inaccurate’ is not a ‘bitch slap’. Please grow up.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok Due to home bound norms. This is exactly what I said.
English

@StellarFox16 @grok Jfc you are pedantic. Women were fighting for independence, equality, agency and a place in public life along with that came a need for public facilities which they also demanded.
‘Single-sex spaces’ is a modern construct you are hung up on.
English



