Valry421
986 posts
If the Supreme Court does the research necessary they will find out the intent of the people who drafted the Birthright Citizenship amendment - AND - Here it is.
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman
🚨 TRUMP IS 100% RIGHT — BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP IS A MASSIVE SCAM! Fox News dropping the brutal numbers • 320,000 babies born in 2023 to unauthorized or temporary immigrant mothers • That’s 9% of ALL U.S. births This is straight-up “birth tourism” on steroids — foreigners gaming the system to anchor babies and chain migration.
English
@Angle__wix Things were much better when blacks were segregated away from us.
English
They had him locked up but they didn’t believe what happened next 🎬🍿
Heisjayy 𝕏@Jayysein
What movie/series has a very good plot twist?
English
@lovetocook12345 That 7 million is a lie. There are 3.6 million registered voters and a 4.6 million in an inactive list. A person is placed on the inactive voter list if they die, move to a different state or are convicted of felony.
wisconsinwatch.org/2026/02/wiscon…
English
Treason.. to purposely, willfully and knowingly conspire to overthrow a government. Be it state or Fed.. still Treason.
English
@AntonioTweets2 Bro in the video needs to shut up. MAGA is a psyop created by pedophile billionaires and their president is a pedophile at worst and a pedophile protector at best
English
@Coolnerdxx22 @AntonioTweets2 Literally. The country is sinking and Orban can't run on domestic "accomplishments," so he is currently manufacturing crisis of a supposed attack from Ukraine to get voters to ignore their suffering and vote to keep him in power
English
@AntonioTweets2 Zohran is the greatest leader in America, Hungary is a shithole
English
@Sudsiii @adamscochran He doesn't seem to have a high opinion of his wife. Bro literally defended his wife from racist attacks from Nick Fuentes, a few months after. Literally took bro like 2 months to make a comeback
English
@adamscochran He’s about to have a fourth child. The last thing he wants right now is to be President.
English
If they actually ask Vance, and follow up with a question of his approval ratings vs Rubio’s maybe he’ll realize it’s his only chance to become President…
Jack Cocchiarella@JDCocchiarella
A reporter needs to ask JD Vance about the 25th Amendment sometime in the next 48 hours
English
@JefferyStein7 @JesseKellyShow @nayibbukele Under what grounds? The act can only be invoked in time of actual (not ideological) insurrection, rebellion, to enforce federal law, or protect the constitutional rights of americans.Americans.
English
@JesseKellyShow @nayibbukele Invoke the Insurrection act and it can be taken care of quickly !
English
@mgholcombe1976 @JesseKellyShow @nayibbukele No. The founders required supermajorities for major structural change to occur in US (Impeachment, amendments). Impeachment of a judge requires simple 50% + 1 in House but requires 2/3 or 67 senators to convict. That is the greatest hurdle to removing judges. Removal is simple 51
English
@JesseKellyShow @nayibbukele El Salvador elected a super majority in their congress. Can we do the same?
English
@real_122109 @_PhallonX0X0 Most of the social safety net and programs that help Americans, were created by democrats. Republicans continue the long march toward making Government not work, then complaining when it doesn't
English
@SaraForTexLege We will have the elections. All that matters at any cost is ensuring they are as "free and fair" as can be.
English
@KaiKaiPDX @SaraForTexLege @SabZillAfoRilla If he even decides to put things back together a little. I vehemently believe he would be fine with being president of the ashes left by Trump
English
@SaraForTexLege @SabZillAfoRilla The worse they let Trump fuck things up before he either dies or is 25th’d, the more JD Vance is going to look like a Savior by doing the absolute minimum to put things back together…..
English
@DemWallet @askDinaDoll @MeidasTouch Maybe some but the national republican party would be hanged by their donors if citizens united were to be allowed to end directly or indirectly
English
@askDinaDoll @MeidasTouch and you do realize that Republicans are okay with blocking corporate money?
English
NEWS: Deep red Montana just moved to take on Citizens United proposing a novel and legally grounded voter initiative to block corporate money in political campaigns. @MeidasTouch
English
@leonardaneman @RealTheoWold Laws by Congress do not preempt Supreme Court precedent. Only amending of the constitution can change that. That is what happened with the thirteenth amendment and Dredd Scott decision.
English
@Constantius421 @RealTheoWold If the court upholds birthright citizenship, there will be strong dissent within the court itself.
Under the constitution, Art I Sec 8 gives congress plenary power over naturalization, so it can convene and overturn the Supreme Court decision.
English
@leonardaneman @RealTheoWold Not entirely, if SCOTUS upholds birthright citizenship. Then any attempt to restrict it is very narrow and likely negligible
English
@RealTheoWold Actually, it is an Article I issue and congress can properly interpret 8 USC 1401, INA §301 according to the original intent.
Congress was given plenary power over immigration and naturalization by the constitution itself, ArtISec8.
English
@boggeerr @OurOwnNation Because 49.8% of the 2024 electorate were stupidly conned by a man trying to do anything but go to prison. Half of that are straight up kool-aid drinkers, 30% are just republicans voting republican and the other 20% are people desperate enough for change, they voted for a pedo
English
@OurOwnNation You can’t pull a wagon without wheels, a toddler could tell you that. How did these idiots get into power?
English
No religious exemptions, no conscientious objectors.
Català
@PerfectFitFarm @adamscochran @ProgressNow00 Maybe. This administration is both evil and incompetent. But still EVIL
English
@adamscochran @ProgressNow00 Could they be reacting to rumors of someone organizing a 25A effort?
English
The same day that Hegseth fires multiple senior army leaders, he announces that individuals "trusted" by the administration will be able to carry arms on base...
On the same day Trump is purging his cabinet...
This is like coup level shit.
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth@SecWar
Our military installations have been turned into gun-free zones—leaving our service members vulnerable and exposed. That ends today.
English
@ShaunaS36092585 @harshcritic1985 @adamscochran It could be that. There was an effort that forced out the admiral overseeing Venezuela operation. Or they see thr writing on the wall and are preparing drastic measures to hold onto power.
English
@adamscochran Extinction burst coming from Trump administration. They see the writing on the wall and know it's nearly over for them. They are potentially trying to put cards in place for after midterms. Or someone told Trump the war is going terribly and is purging those "responsible"
English
@ryanswalters73 The loud minority of moronic MAGA are screaming their fringe and unhinged theory is somehow the majority view of those who passed the fourteenth amendment
English
It’s so simple, only a complete moron, or TDS leftist, could possibly misunderstand it. A simple understanding of language, punctuation, and sentence structure helps too.
Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan introduced the 14th amendment and said this:
"This amendment which I have offered, is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons."
English
@RetroCoast "If SCOTUS doesn't throw out constitution and conservative jurisprudence to rule in favor of my desired outcome, then SCOTUS is illegitimate."
-Retro Coast
English
The Birthright Citizenship case is not about birthright citizenship.
It's about the legitimacy of the Supreme Court itself.
Clearly the 14th Amendment was not meant to give citizenship to anchor babies. That's not even in dispute.
The legitimacy of the Supreme Court is on trial.
If they get this one wrong- then clearly, we do not have a functioning judiciary system.
Only political activists masquerading as Judges.
English