Christopher Bailey
9.6K posts


@TheBMTIB @Kalibunga The man said two firsts and koivenen. Not to mention this all hinges on if Dallas can afford to keep him. If not then they’ll be forced to trade him for lower. Idk if koivenen gets it done but I don’t think this is that far off
English

@Kalibunga Bowen Byram just went for two firsts including #4 overall... but you're going to get Robertson for #22 and Koivunen? 😂😂
Can we get McDavid in your video game deal too?
English

@letangcult Yeah especially with his performance against the flyers.. my biggest regret this season
English

@CoulditBe_BailE @Thompsonalysis Fair enough. It's just not as large an advantage as some make it out to be.
English

@letangcult @Flux_cc I don’t mind your logic. The problem (I think) is that Vancouver is going to want more than what I’d be willing to offer for him. Assets that I feel could be better used on a sure thing. If we can get him at a reasonable price I suppose I could get behind it
English

@CoulditBe_BailE @Flux_cc Then you're going to pay considerably more like Tkachuk. I like MP40 because it's a high-reward situation.
English

@cyclnvancouver @Thompsonalysis The jock tax is a thing you are correct. But when you aren’t being taxed for the 50% of games you play at home vs other teams who must pay for 100% (not counting the games you play in zero tax states ofc) then that’s still a huge advantage.
English

@Thompsonalysis They actually get taxed in every state that they play games. That makes the 0% tax states less important.
English

@letangcult @Flux_cc Id rather take risks on players that dont have possible locker room issues or health issues (Patrick Laine). Thats like adding another variable into whats already a reclamation project. If were spending assets to acquire big names then they better produce here. If hes cheap maybe
English

@CoulditBe_BailE @Flux_cc EP40 is a big risk, but if we get his worst full year (15-30-45), I'll take that. Is the contract an albatross? Very much so, but the Penguins have cap to burn anyhow.
English

@Flux_cc @letangcult I found it lmao. Skimming too fast I guess. Apologies there.
English

@Flux_cc @letangcult Reread a third time. I’m using the reader, unless the reader is hiding the comment, that is not in the same article as the OPs initial quote. Regardless I’m okay with taking chances on some boom or bust players but I don’t feel Petterson should be one of them
English

@Flux_cc @letangcult I just reread the article I still don’t see that comment
English

@Flux_cc @letangcult Possibly. I don’t recall that comment specifically do you have it handy? I don’t personally want to take a risk on Petterson
English

@CoulditBe_BailE @letangcult No but the comment about a high-ceiling possibly boom or bust player, EP40 fits that.
English

@mousepuppyy Banana bread at work dude?? Hell yeah.
English

@Entoma2657 Your girlfriend has zero survival instincts. If you can’t breathe, idk turn down the heat, turn the shower off, or open the door?
English

@DanHoppOPS @KyleCryptoLand For sure. I guess we’re mostly talking for Pitt in terms of what it would take for us to want to take him. Feel free to send that contract elsewhere I won’t be offended
English

@KyleCryptoLand @CoulditBe_BailE I could be completely wrong (and some of the info about teams' "interest" could've been deliberately leaked) but I don't think they'd have *that* much trouble moving Nurse if they didn't care about the return, someone would take him (SJ, ANH, CBJ, PHI, DET)
English

@KyleCryptoLand @DanHoppOPS I get that. That would be ideal. I doubt edm offers that considering shedding cap is the entire reason theyd want to move him. Cap flexibility is always valuable I get that, I just don’t see that happening
English

@CoulditBe_BailE @DanHoppOPS The reason I want retention is to make Nurse himself flippable at the TDL
I think he can be a reasonable 2nd pair guy or a very effective 3rd pair - but no one will trade for that if he’s at 9.25M hit
A $4ish cap hit makes him trade bait if he can perform in a 2nd pair role
English







